Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, as charitable organizations go, Komen isn't one of the better as far as dollars to research is concerned. There are many organizations that do the same thing with less administrative overhead.
You apparently are talking out of your ass... again.
Charity Navigator Rating - Susan G. Komen for the Cure
80.5% goes to program expenses, which the site defines as follows:
11.8% goes to administrative expenses, which the site defines as follows:
$0.09 is their fundraising efficiency rating, which the site defines as follows:
The amount spent to raise $1 in charitable contributions. To calculate a charity's fundraising efficiency, we divide its fundraising expenses by the total contributions it receives.
Those are pretty good numbers, compared to many other charities.
All I said is that there are better ones out there...ones that don't try to politicize cancer research with right wing agendas.
It's a bad thing to be anti abortion now? Who knew?
Be anti abortion all you want.
quit being anti choice.
That is negative
Hey stupid.... pro-choice = pro-abortion.
You apparently are talking out of your ass... again.
Charity Navigator Rating - Susan G. Komen for the Cure
80.5% goes to program expenses, which the site defines as follows:
11.8% goes to administrative expenses, which the site defines as follows:
$0.09 is their fundraising efficiency rating, which the site defines as follows:
Those are pretty good numbers, compared to many other charities.
All I said is that there are better ones out there...ones that don't try to politicize cancer research with right wing agendas.
You specifically commented on administrative overhead. I showed you how low it is, and that it is as good or better than others. You mentioned nothing until now of having an agenda problem with them, which is certainly your right.
Komen will not receive any more donations from me as well as most of my friends.
yeah... fuck those women with cancer, right?
I'm sure there are other organizations that help with breast cancer research and treatment that don't support abortion clinics. My donations will go to those organizations.
Using your logic.....you would say "fuck those murdered babies" right?
sarcasm escapes you, doesn't it.
Kill all of your children you wish. Just dont use tax payer money.
Its that simple.
Komen is a private organization, they do not use tax dollars.
I do agree with you that NO tax dollars should be used to fund abortions
No tax dollars fund abortions...I know, Rush Beckibaugh Savage told you differently, so you don't believe it... but hey whoever said they told the truth?
planned parenthood helps prenant women get the care they need in poor sectors of our entire nation.
The right has gone completely insane
poor pregnant women should not be getting any tax dollars?
Your evil
All I said is that there are better ones out there...ones that don't try to politicize cancer research with right wing agendas.
You specifically commented on administrative overhead. I showed you how low it is, and that it is as good or better than others. You mentioned nothing until now of having an agenda problem with them, which is certainly your right.
And there are many out there with LESS administrative overhead. Those are the ones I will donate to in the future.
Komen is a private organization, they do not use tax dollars.
I do agree with you that NO tax dollars should be used to fund abortions
No tax dollars fund abortions...I know, Rush Beckibaugh Savage told you differently, so you don't believe it... but hey whoever said they told the truth?
If federal funds are given to PP then yes, tax dollars are being used to fund abortions.
Unlike you, I don't need anyone to tell me what to think.
Be anti abortion all you want.
quit being anti choice.
That is negative
Hey stupid.... pro-choice = pro-abortion.
Really, you ignorant, redneck racist motherfucker?
See how absolutes work? I saw your Confederate flag avatar and assumed that you were stupid, have 12 dead cars in your trailer trash yard, hate black people and fuck your mother.... all with one picture.
You specifically commented on administrative overhead. I showed you how low it is, and that it is as good or better than others. You mentioned nothing until now of having an agenda problem with them, which is certainly your right.
And there are many out there with LESS administrative overhead. Those are the ones I will donate to in the future.
According to Charity Navigator, 'many' appears to be an overstatement, although there are a few.
One in particular looks like a good bet for you...
Charity Navigator Rating - Breast Cancer Research Foundation
Program Expenses is 91.5%, with Administrative Expenses of only 2.3%. However, their total revenue was only $36 million.
Komen was at 80.5% and 11.8%, respectively, but their total revenue was considerably higher, at $311 million.
It's quite possible, although it's only an opinion, that the higher administrative costs are directly proportional to the amount of revenue generated and the people required to generate it.
I guess all I am really saying is that if you have a philosophical problem with them, that's certainly your right. But don't let the administrative cost numbers sway you.
It's a bad thing to be anti abortion now? Who knew?
Hey stupid.... pro-choice = pro-abortion.
Really, you ignorant, redneck racist motherfucker?
See how absolutes work? I saw your Confederate flag avatar and assumed that you were stupid, have 12 dead cars in your trailer trash yard, hate black people and fuck your mother.... all with one picture.
You can make any assumption you like. The fact is if you are pro-choice you are by default pro-abortion, conversely if you're pro-life you are anti-abortion. There is no middle ground.
Hey stupid.... pro-choice = pro-abortion.
Really, you ignorant, redneck racist motherfucker?
See how absolutes work? I saw your Confederate flag avatar and assumed that you were stupid, have 12 dead cars in your trailer trash yard, hate black people and fuck your mother.... all with one picture.
You can make any assumption you like. The fact is if you are pro-choice you are by default pro-abortion, conversely if you're pro-life you are anti-abortion. There is no middle ground.
No tax dollars fund abortions...I know, Rush Beckibaugh Savage told you differently, so you don't believe it... but hey whoever said they told the truth?
If federal funds are given to PP then yes, tax dollars are being used to fund abortions.
Unlike you, I don't need anyone to tell me what to think.
Really? even if they set aside those dollars for other uses.... their records are impeccable...they have to be...because of people like you....which is(IMO) actually something that I am completely fine with.
But to sit here and say that if they use that money to pay for cancer screenings, wellness checkups and birth control other than abortion is still paying for abortions is ridiculous....and has been repeated ad naseum by the AM radio crowd.
abortion is such a red herring issue......neither party is gonna do a thing about something the equals how much money a year for doctors?
Really, you ignorant, redneck racist motherfucker?
See how absolutes work? I saw your Confederate flag avatar and assumed that you were stupid, have 12 dead cars in your trailer trash yard, hate black people and fuck your mother.... all with one picture.
You can make any assumption you like. The fact is if you are pro-choice you are by default pro-abortion, conversely if you're pro-life you are anti-abortion. There is no middle ground.
Facts....according to(of course)....you.
