realinvestment
realinvestmentstrategies
- Mar 2, 2013
- 167
- 18
From page 94 of the Exxon 10-K.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From page 94 of the Exxon 10-K.
From page 94 of the Exxon 10-K.
Yes, but that doesn't quite tell the whole story, does it? You left out the fact that Exxon pays a 44% effective world-wide income tax rate, that more than 2/3 of their income is earned outside the US, and that their domestic (US) income tax rate on their income earned in the US is 16.8% for the federal income tax, 22.1% if you also include state income taxes, and 31.9% if you include deferred items that will be taxed in future years based on that years(2011) income.
You can't take their US tax and divide by worldwide income (where they pay even higher tax rates) and then report in one line what you concluded without being deceptive. Maybe that was the point of your deceptive OP?
From page 94 of the Exxon 10-K.
Yes, but that doesn't quite tell the whole story, does it? You left out the fact that Exxon pays a 44% effective world-wide income tax rate, that more than 2/3 of their income is earned outside the US, and that their domestic (US) income tax rate on their income earned in the US is 16.8% for the federal income tax, 22.1% if you also include state income taxes, and 31.9% if you include deferred items that will be taxed in future years based on that years(2011) income.
You can't take their US tax and divide by worldwide income (where they pay even higher tax rates) and then report in one line what you concluded without being deceptive. Maybe that was the point of your deceptive OP?
From page 94 of the Exxon 10-K.
How much did General Electric pay?
The US isn't getting its fair share.
GE hasn't paid a dime for years?
Yet what will some domestic owned firm pay? A lot, and a lot more since the fiscal cliff deal was made.
The system gives a huge advantage to the multinational corporation. It's an uneven playing field.
From page 94 of the Exxon 10-K.
Yes, but that doesn't quite tell the whole story, does it? You left out the fact that Exxon pays a 44% effective world-wide income tax rate, that more than 2/3 of their income is earned outside the US, and that their domestic (US) income tax rate on their income earned in the US is 16.8% for the federal income tax, 22.1% if you also include state income taxes, and 31.9% if you include deferred items that will be taxed in future years based on that years(2011) income.
You can't take their US tax and divide by worldwide income (where they pay even higher tax rates) and then report in one line what you concluded without being deceptive. Maybe that was the point of your deceptive OP?
When a company like Exxon, which you concede earns 1/3 of its income in the US, pays only 1.791B out of before tax income of 78.726B, something is wrong with the US tax code.
The US isn't getting its fair share.
GE hasn't paid a dime for years?
Yet what will some domestic owned firm pay? A lot, and a lot more since the fiscal cliff deal was made.
The system gives a huge advantage to the multinational corporation. It's an uneven playing field.
Alright...what the hell is going on?
We got dozens of idiots all of a sudden...what would be board crashed this time?
And why do they end up here?
Alright...what the hell is going on?
We got dozens of idiots all of a sudden...what would be board crashed this time?
And why do they end up here?
If there is anything I posted that is untrue, please correct it. We have to start with true facts, then make our conclusions.
GE hasn't paid a dime for years?
Yet what will some domestic owned firm pay? A lot, and a lot more since the fiscal cliff deal was made.
The system gives a huge advantage to the multinational corporation. It's an uneven playing field.
From page 94 of the Exxon 10-K.
Yes, but that doesn't quite tell the whole story, does it? You left out the fact that Exxon pays a 44% effective world-wide income tax rate, that more than 2/3 of their income is earned outside the US, and that their domestic (US) income tax rate on their income earned in the US is 16.8% for the federal income tax, 22.1% if you also include state income taxes, and 31.9% if you include deferred items that will be taxed in future years based on that years(2011) income.
You can't take their US tax and divide by worldwide income (where they pay even higher tax rates) and then report in one line what you concluded without being deceptive. Maybe that was the point of your deceptive OP?
When a company like Exxon, which you concede earns 1/3 of its income in the US, pays only 1.791B out of before tax income of 78.726B, something is wrong with the US tax code.
The US isn't getting its fair share.
Alright...what the hell is going on?
We got dozens of idiots all of a sudden...what would be board crashed this time?
And why do they end up here?
If there is anything I posted that is untrue, please correct it. We have to start with true facts, then make our conclusions.
From page 94 of the Exxon 10-K.