Family Of Eight Get Shot, Execution Style, In John Kasichs State!

In the United States more mass shootings are committed by liberals than islamics.
Want to prove that with political registration? Nah, did not think so.

Here's one: 42 terror killings by Muslims in five years and several times that by freeky righties.

You are mentally ill, kid, and all the Board knows it.

So please share the couple hundred "TERRORIST" killings by "freeky" righties.
Southern rural Ohio? Probably rednecks

Rednecks some of the very best people in the world! Hearts of gold and will drop anything to help anyone.
 
I said the last five years: 42 murders by Muslim terrorists and several times that by right wing kooks. You know it and I know it. Run along.


Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

Due entirely to the "wall of silence" President Clinton put in place that prevented our 17 intelligence agencies from communicating with each other. The intended purpose was to prevent leaks from too many agencies having access to information. The tragic result was that the agencies could not work together to connect the dots.
 
I said the last five years: 42 murders by Muslim terrorists and several times that by right wing kooks. You know it and I know it. Run along.


Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

You mean the left over of clinton's watch.......when he didn't take the attacks on the first World Trade center bombing, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole or the Kobar Towers...and refused to take osama........and then left the mess for Bush to deal with.....
Nah, it was on Bush's watch, his fault. Then the dope invaded Iraq and made the whole mess as bad as it was, YUUUGE.


Nope...Clinton ignored the problem for 8 years....and got out of office before they knocked the towers down......and Iraq was only a mess because of the left wing regressive 5th column attacking the war effort from the start......then the twit Obama pulled us out before the country was under countrol......the way we stayed in Europe, Okinawa, Japan, The Phillipines, ITaly, South Korea........Iraq and Afghanistan are the only countries we left before they were stable...all at the direction of left wing regressives........

Look what they did for Libya and Syria....

Case made.....
Your beta male logic is weak, weak, weak.

Bush so screwed our country: he should not have invaded, then he could not get a workable SOFA and did not have the balls to pull out so passed onto Obama, who also unable to get a good SOFA had the balls to pull us out.

Your beta male revisionism is weak, weak, weak.
 
In the United States more mass shootings are committed by liberals than islamics.
Want to prove that with political registration? Nah, did not think so.

Here's one: 42 terror killings by Muslims in five years and several times that by freeky righties.

You are mentally ill, kid, and all the Board knows it.

So please share the couple hundred "TERRORIST" killings by "freeky" righties.
Southern rural Ohio? Probably rednecks

Rednecks some of the very best people in the world! Hearts of gold and will drop anything to help anyone.
That has been many times on the Board, as you may know. If you do, you don't get "just once more," you get fuck you. If you don't know, go research it because you sound like a beta human, so research is something you might do well.

Are you the "wall of silence", clown? The wall of silence passed by a Republican Congress? The wall of silence that could have been rectified with an EO.
 
I said the last five years: 42 murders by Muslim terrorists and several times that by right wing kooks. You know it and I know it. Run along.


Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

You mean the left over of clinton's watch.......when he didn't take the attacks on the first World Trade center bombing, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole or the Kobar Towers...and refused to take osama........and then left the mess for Bush to deal with.....
Nah, it was on Bush's watch, his fault. Then the dope invaded Iraq and made the whole mess as bad as it was, YUUUGE.

Your ignorance and denial of the facts are truly impressive!
 
I said the last five years: 42 murders by Muslim terrorists and several times that by right wing kooks. You know it and I know it. Run along.


Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

You mean the left over of clinton's watch.......when he didn't take the attacks on the first World Trade center bombing, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole or the Kobar Towers...and refused to take osama........and then left the mess for Bush to deal with.....
Nah, it was on Bush's watch, his fault. Then the dope invaded Iraq and made the whole mess as bad as it was, YUUUGE.
Your ignorance and denial of the facts are truly impressive!
Says a beta male. Let's make it easy on you. Why was Bush unable to sign a SOFA deal before he left office?
 
In the United States more mass shootings are committed by liberals than islamics.
Want to prove that with political registration? Nah, did not think so.

Here's one: 42 terror killings by Muslims in five years and several times that by freeky righties.

You are mentally ill, kid, and all the Board knows it.

So please share the couple hundred "TERRORIST" killings by "freaky" righties.
Southern rural Ohio? Probably rednecks

Rednecks some of the very best people in the world! Hearts of gold and will drop anything to help anyone.
That has been many times on the Board, as you may know. If you do, you don't get "just once more," you get fuck you. If you don't know, go research it because you sound like a beta human, so research is something you might do well.

Are you the "wall of silence", clown? The wall of silence passed by a Republican Congress? The wall of silence that could have been rectified with an EO.

Do your little feet stomping and childish profanity antics intimidate anyone? The only ones I can think of are the little weenie college Progressives who cry when their feelings are hurt.

The wall was originally erected by Jamie Gorelick to hide contributions to Clinton's presidential campaign from foreign sources...over $1.2 million was hidden by straw donors....but in turn, it also prevented the sharing of foreign and domestic intelligence.

Bush assigned Stanley McChrystal as the commander of Joint Special Operation Command from 2003-2008...Under McChrystal JSOC had a dramatic change in worldwide intelligence....he successfully combined military, domestic and international intelligence to form a worldwide sharing of intelligence data.....and Obama continues JSCO...they were responsible for Bin Laden's demise.


Legislation put forth by President George Walker Bush, and a new oversight agency created after the attack remedied this fatal error and gathers intelligence from all agencies. How many fatal Islamic Terrorist attacks...until President Barack Hussein Obama, did we have?
 
Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

You mean the left over of clinton's watch.......when he didn't take the attacks on the first World Trade center bombing, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole or the Kobar Towers...and refused to take osama........and then left the mess for Bush to deal with.....
Nah, it was on Bush's watch, his fault. Then the dope invaded Iraq and made the whole mess as bad as it was, YUUUGE.


Nope...Clinton ignored the problem for 8 years....and got out of office before they knocked the towers down......and Iraq was only a mess because of the left wing regressive 5th column attacking the war effort from the start......then the twit Obama pulled us out before the country was under countrol......the way we stayed in Europe, Okinawa, Japan, The Phillipines, ITaly, South Korea........Iraq and Afghanistan are the only countries we left before they were stable...all at the direction of left wing regressives........

Look what they did for Libya and Syria....

Case made.....
Your beta male logic is weak, weak, weak.

Bush so screwed our country: he should not have invaded, then he could not get a workable SOFA and did not have the balls to pull out so passed onto Obama, who also unable to get a good SOFA had the balls to pull us out.

Your beta male revisionism is weak, weak, weak.

Let's see who called for an invasion even prior to President Bush taking office.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”

- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998


"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certainhe will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003


"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.


"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.


Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)




He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."


Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.


"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."


- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.





And now the Obama administration wants to TAKE CREDIT for the Iraq war…whew….
 
I said the last five years: 42 murders by Muslim terrorists and several times that by right wing kooks. You know it and I know it. Run along.


Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

Due entirely to the "wall of silence" President Clinton put in place that prevented our 17 intelligence agencies from communicating with each other. The intended purpose was to prevent leaks from too many agencies having access to information. The tragic result was that the agencies could not work together to connect the dots.


Yes...clinton didn't want them sharing info. because of all the deals he was making with the chinese and other foreign countries for out technology....
 
In the United States more mass shootings are committed by liberals than islamics.
Want to prove that with political registration? Nah, did not think so.

Here's one: 42 terror killings by Muslims in five years and several times that by freeky righties.

You are mentally ill, kid, and all the Board knows it.

So please share the couple hundred "TERRORIST" killings by "freaky" righties.
Southern rural Ohio? Probably rednecks

Rednecks some of the very best people in the world! Hearts of gold and will drop anything to help anyone.
That has been many times on the Board, as you may know. If you do, you don't get "just once more," you get fuck you. If you don't know, go research it because you sound like a beta human, so research is something you might do well.

Are you the "wall of silence", clown? The wall of silence passed by a Republican Congress? The wall of silence that could have been rectified with an EO.

Do your little feet stomping and childish profanity antics intimidate anyone? The only ones I can think of are the little weenie college Progressives who cry when their feelings are hurt.

The wall was originally erected by Jamie Gorelick to hide contributions to Clinton's presidential campaign from foreign sources...over $1.2 million was hidden by straw donors....but in turn, it also prevented the sharing of foreign and domestic intelligence.

Bush assigned Stanley McChrystal as the commander of Joint Special Operation Command from 2003-2008...Under McChrystal JSOC had a dramatic change in worldwide intelligence....he successfully combined military, domestic and international intelligence to form a worldwide sharing of intelligence data.....and Obama continues JSCO...they were responsible for Bin Laden's demise.


Legislation put forth by President George Walker Bush, and a new oversight agency created after the attack remedied this fatal error and gathers intelligence from all agencies. How many fatal Islamic Terrorist attacks...until President Barack Hussein Obama, did we have?
Your misdirection only made you, you my little fool, look in the wrong direction.

I have seen no evidence that "liberals" have committed more mass killings than righty terrorists, unless you are equating liberals with black criminals. You are fucking stupid.

Bush's people could have changed it, they did not.

Since 9-11, in America, terrorist killings in the USA are weighted to the right. :)
 
Poor Markle Darkle, we are talking the last five years, he goes back 25 years that mean nothing as a misdirection, which don't work, ese. :lol:

Markle, your are a weak ass beta male who would run away from a true mainstream GOP guy every single time.

Catch the last train for Clarksville.
 
Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

You mean the left over of clinton's watch.......when he didn't take the attacks on the first World Trade center bombing, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole or the Kobar Towers...and refused to take osama........and then left the mess for Bush to deal with.....
Nah, it was on Bush's watch, his fault. Then the dope invaded Iraq and made the whole mess as bad as it was, YUUUGE.


Nope...Clinton ignored the problem for 8 years....and got out of office before they knocked the towers down......and Iraq was only a mess because of the left wing regressive 5th column attacking the war effort from the start......then the twit Obama pulled us out before the country was under countrol......the way we stayed in Europe, Okinawa, Japan, The Phillipines, ITaly, South Korea........Iraq and Afghanistan are the only countries we left before they were stable...all at the direction of left wing regressives........

Look what they did for Libya and Syria....

Case made.....
Your beta male logic is weak, weak, weak.

Bush so screwed our country: he should not have invaded, then he could not get a workable SOFA and did not have the balls to pull out so passed onto Obama, who also unable to get a good SOFA had the balls to pull us out.

Your beta male revisionism is weak, weak, weak.


Wrong...Obama didn't want a status of forces agreement...and pulled out our troops from a stable country...allowing Isis to take over.............
 
Wrong...Obama didn't want a status of forces agreement...and pulled out our troops from a stable country...allowing Isis to take over.............
Your lie is so easy to point out.

Obama wanted an agreement that guaranteed our troops would not be tried in Iraqi tribunals or courts, which is normal for most SOFAs, and the norm for wartime SOFAs.

Are you Iraqi or Muslim, for your statement above only makes sense if you are one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top