Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lots of right wingers are.Dude was a lunatic.
I read the link which says nothing like what you described.Oh that's right...you ignored the link in the OP. You ignore reality to keep pushing your fantasy
I bet you still believe Obama’s birth certificate is fake.0 for 2
Nobody cares about your links that require a subscription to espouse leftwing lunatic conspiracy theories, Simp.Lots of right wingers are.
Did you think being a right winger and being a lunatic are exclusive?
LoL
They’re not opinion pieces. They’re journalism. They went out and talked to people who knew him. Something your shitrags are too lazy to do.
Um literally says FBI agents, under oath admitted to meeting weekly with the Tweeter folks. Are you saying the Agent is committing perjury? What's your bases for that?I read the link which says nothing like what you described.
Um literally says FBI agents, under oath admitted to meeting weekly with the Tweeter folks. Are you saying the Agent is committing perjury? What's your bases for that?
The fact that you call them left wing lunatic conspiracy theories while admitting you haven’t read them proves my point.Nobody cares about your links that require a subscription to espouse leftwing lunatic conspiracy theories, Simp.
Nope. But that’s not all you said about the meetings. Is it?Um literally says FBI agents, under oath admitted to meeting weekly with the Tweeter folks. Are you saying the Agent is committing perjury? What's your bases for that?
what's sad is their constant attack on simple career civil servants like this FBI agent, who was brave enough to come forward...there have been others that have come forward to blow the whisle on the current admin's work to weaponzie the DOJ against political rivals.Lunatics like that will never disagree with their cult leaders.
Facts have no effect on them.
www.washingtontimes.com
www.grassley.senate.gov
Yes, yes I said they were meeting weeklyNope. But that’s not all you said about the meetings. Is it?
Are you going to keep acting this stupid?Yes, yes I said they were meeting weekly
Which means they can shill for democrats all they want. What they can't do, however, is do so without backlash from the community, which they're rightfully getting, or to do so without having it pointed out that they're donating to Quid Pro's party.You should read them some time. They're worded in a way that allows sites like this to ban you if they wish.
And you're giving Quid Pro an in-kind donation. Thankfully for you, you're small potatoes enough that it doesn't matter.You understand that as a private entity I can support and donate to whomever I choose don't you? If I put a Joe Biden flag in my front yard I'm not violating your rights because I don't invite you over to tell me how great Trump is.
Not at all. If you sponsor a dinner party for Quid Pro, that's an in-kind contribution and must be reported. If you own a radio station and give free air time to Quid Pro, that's an in-kind contribution and must be reported. If you own a hotel and let him stay there for free while on the campaign, that's an in-kind contribution and must be reported. Pretty much anything you give a campaign that's not actual money is an in-kind contribution, and if worth more than $200, must be reported as such. Thus, if you own a media platform and you, through squashing certain opinions and championing others, give Quid Pro millions of dollars of free publicity, well, you know the drill.So take my Joe Biden flag scenario. Tell me what rights you think you now have on my property because I planted a Biden flag in my yard
Technically it's only an issue if you are selling ad time. Facebook and Twitter have to comply with those rules for ads that pop up on their site, what you post is not their content they just host it and they don't have to give you equal time.
I suppose if I have to keep dealing with someone with your brain activityAre you going to keep acting this stupid?
Nope. But that’s not all you said about the meetings. Is it?
Um literally says FBI agents, under oath admitted to meeting weekly with the Tweeter folks. Are you saying the Agent is committing perjury? What's your bases for that?
1) when did I say that? I don't believe I do, unless Tweeter was acting as a State Actor. Please try and keep up.
My lawn is the same as Twitter. I can invite whoever I want on to my lawn for a lawn party and I can kick out anyone I want if they talk about things I don't approve of and it doesn't matter if I'm an FBI informant. My private property doesn't suddenly become a place you have free speech rights.2) no, but you certainly don't have a right to violate my Constitutional rights otherwise. Your lawn isn't the same as Tweeter....but if you are a State Actor you don't have a right to illegally search my house.
Where did I ever claim that as a CI (and a government employee) that I have a right to conduct a search and seizure of your residence?3) no, it's pretty simple to those of us that aren't bias. You think if you are acting as a CI you have the right to conduct illegal searches? GOULED v. UNITED STATES. thankfully the law disagrees with you.
Where does our Constitution does it give SOMEONE, ANYONE, the authority to decide what can or should be published?Was it to censor political speech or remove lies, propaganda and misinformation?
Go ahead and stomp your feet if it makes you feel better.Which means they can shill for democrats all they want. What they can't do, however, is do so without backlash from the community, which they're rightfully getting, or to do so without having it pointed out that they're donating to Quid Pro's party.
If I sponsor a dinner for Biden I don't also ha to sponsor a dinner for Trump. We are allowed to take political sides. It's part of the whole first amendment.And you're giving Quid Pro an in-kind donation. Thankfully for you, you're small potatoes enough that it doesn't matter.
Not at all. If you sponsor a dinner party for Quid Pro, that's an in-kind contribution and must be reported.
Because as a radio station you have the privilege of broadcasting on public airwaves.If you own a radio station and give free air time to Quid Pro, that's an in-kind contribution and must be reported.
I can give for free to whatever I want. I can't only sell ad space to one side.If you own a hotel and let him stay there for free while on the campaign, that's an in-kind contribution and must be reported. Pretty much anything you give a campaign that's not actual money is an in-kind contribution, and if worth more than $200, must be reported as such. Thus, if you own a media platform and you, through squashing certain opinions and championing others, give Quid Pro millions of dollars of free publicity, well, you know the drill.
If you invite someone onto you lawn to verbally debate you and then kick them off when you hear a fact, experience or opinion that you don’t want to hear then you have done nothing except show what a dishonest pussy you are.You try keeping up. If you don't have a right to speech on Facebook or Twitter then they can't be violating your rights since none exist. How hard is that for you to understand my guy?
My lawn is the same as Twitter. I can invite whoever I want on to my lawn for a lawn party and I can kick out anyone I want if they talk about things I don't approve of and it doesn't matter if I'm an FBI informant. My private property doesn't suddenly become a place you have free speech rights.
Where did I ever claim that as a CI (and a government employee) that I have a right to conduct a search and seizure of your residence?
