FBI agent under oath: FBI met weekly with Big Tech to censor political information.

They certainly can, and publish whatever they want.

With that said, we are talking about something beyond just that, we are talking about the State Actor Doctrine....a private company or entity that is a State Actor, can't violate people's constitutional rights

Correct in other terms -

The Government cannot get other people to do what would be illegal for the Government to do.
 
Correct in other terms -

The Government cannot get other people to do what would be illegal for the Government to do.
that's correct. Here's a pretty easy example, someone breaks into someone's home...they commit a breaking and entering....a crime....they find a ton of child porn....they then report it to law enforcement. Perfectly legal for the cops to use that information.

The cops get a guy to break into someone's home to find evidence...without a warrant, illegal...can't be used.
 
1) yes and they did a much better job then Obama.
2) Hunter's laptop story wasn't Russian...it exist, it was real.
The thread TOPIC is the FBI in general, breaking the constitution for telling social media about Russian threats or any foreign power trying to influence our elections through misinformation campaigns, that they spot through their intelligence.....

the court case where an FBI agent is testifying n Calif, brought on by a suit from 2 different referent state AGs....

but as far as Hunter laptop, Facebook already said, they made the decision themselves, based on what they knew.

And with none of it verified by an individual independent source, for that New York Post lap top article given to the POST via Steve Bannon, a trump CAMPAIGN manager with no qualms with spreading Russian propaganda... as an October surprise for Trump, they had every reason to question the validity and who was really behind creating it....verification was needed.


It would have influenced ZERO democrats in to dumping Biden for Trump.

And your side passed it around to all of your network of right wing media without twitter...etc.
 
Last edited:
Maybe that is why people like you remain so fucking ignorant.
It’s not ignorant to be able to tell right wing misinformation from reality.

Its why people like you think Paul Pelosi was attacked by a lover and not a crazed right winger who broke into his house.

There are many examples.
 
The thread TOPIC is the FBI in general, breaking the constitution for telling social media about Russian threats or any foreign power trying to influence our elections through misinformation campaigns, that they spot through their intelligence.....

the court case where an FBI agent is testifying n Calif, brought on by a suit from 2 different referent state AGs....

but as far as Hunter laptop, Facebook already said, they made the decision themselves, based on what they knew.

And with none of it verified by an individual independent source, for that New York Post lap top article given to the POST via Steve Bannon, a trump CAMPAIGN manager with no qualms with spreading Russian propaganda... as an October surprise for Trump, they had every reason to question the validity and who was really behind creating it.


It would have influenced ZERO democrats in to dumping Biden for Trump.

And your side passed it around to all of your network of right wing media without twitter...etc.

It would have influenced ZERO democrats in to dumping Biden for Trump.


And you base this on what, exactly?


Democrats Likely Would Have Changed Vote From Biden If They Had Known Hunter’s Laptop Was Authentic​


In a new poll that was recently taken by TIPP Insights, which surveyed over 1,000 voters, including almost half of them knowing about Hunter’s laptop – Seventy-one percent of Democrat respondents that that if they had known the contents of Hunter’s laptop was “authentic” – something that was admitted by The New York Times in March 2022 – they would likely have changed their vote.

Also 75 of Democrat respondents said that “truthful interpretation of the laptop” likely would have led to a different outcome (so would not committing voter fraud) of the 2020 presidential election.

 
It’s not ignorant to be able to tell right wing misinformation from reality.

Its why people like you think Paul Pelosi was attacked by a lover and not a crazed right winger who broke into his house.

There are many examples.
Link us up to him being a "right winger".

This will be a hoot.
 
Link us up to him being a "right winger".

This will be a hoot.
I’d love to, but it’s not going to make any difference. I already know what your reply will be.

It’s because your bubble cannot be penetrated. You’ll just deny, deny, deny.


 
I’d love to, but it’s not going to make any difference. I already know what your reply will be.

It’s because your bubble cannot be penetrated. You’ll just deny, deny, deny.


First, I'm not signing up for that shitrag NYTs.

Second, I'm not looking for some opinion piece from a far left loon.

Try again.
 
The thread TOPIC is the FBI in general, breaking the constitution for telling social media about Russian threats or any foreign power trying to influence our elections through misinformation campaigns, that they spot through their intelligence.....

the court case where an FBI agent is testifying n Calif, brought on by a suit from 2 different referent state AGs....

but as far as Hunter laptop, Facebook already said, they made the decision themselves, based on what they knew.

And with none of it verified by an individual independent source, for that New York Post lap top article given to the POST via Steve Bannon, a trump CAMPAIGN manager with no qualms with spreading Russian propaganda... as an October surprise for Trump, they had every reason to question the validity and who was really behind creating it....verification was needed.


It would have influenced ZERO democrats in to dumping Biden for Trump.

And your side passed it around to all of your network of right wing media without twitter...etc.
No, this thread topic is about the FBI meetign weekly with Tweeter folks to censor news reports, real ones, that were damaging to the Xiden campaign. The laptop is real...the FBI had it, heck in fact there was a Grand Jury investigating Hunter.j

What facts are coming to light, is that Wray's FBI, had gone rogue and attempted to censor the news because they harmed Xiden. The only real question at this point, is what did the Xiden campaign know, and when did they know it....were they involveed too? because that could be some serious campaign fin laws broken.
 
First, I'm not signing up for that shitrag NYTs.

Second, I'm not looking for some opinion piece from a far left loon.

Try again.
They’re not opinion pieces. They’re journalism. The right wing shitrags you love looking at don’t do journalism so you’ll never know.

It’s why people like you stay so fucking ignorant.
 
They’re not opinion pieces. They’re journalism. The right wing shitrags you love looking at don’t do journalism so you’ll never know.

It’s why people like you stay so fucking ignorant.
Yes, they are opinion pieces. The NYSlimes ran with the initial narrative that has been debunked. Dude was a lunatic.
 
Damn you're FUCKING STUPID.

Why else would the FBI disappear Hunter Biden's laptop?

And then spread LIES about it being Russian disinformation?

They're protecting the president. Double fuckin duh.

That one is deep into the cult.
Hard to explain reality to those people.
 
It’s not ignorant to be able to tell right wing misinformation from reality.

Its why people like you think Paul Pelosi was attacked by a lover and not a crazed right winger who broke into his house.

There are many examples.

0 for 2
 

Forum List

Back
Top