Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, that would be the case in an FBI that wasn't a nest of traitors. They haven't broken 1/100th as many laws as BLM and Antifa.
If he thinks it violates someone's rights, yes he can. Do you believe government employees should obey laws to imprison innocent people?That's actually an interesting position to take. That a government employee who disagrees with a government regulation, can refuse to enforce it?
Very true. When are they going to start enforcing our immigration laws?he never said he would enforce a regulation
with that said, we see xiden doing that daily
In this case, they are criminals.I would hope that the people charged with catching criminals, weren't themselves criminals.
They break laws all the time, douchebag. Their reputation is shit.That the FBI as you posted, doesn't break laws is the basis of their reputation as a law enforcement agency.
I think you're talking about the federal agents in Laffayette Park who violated peoples 1st amendment right to peacefully assemble in a public space.So he was fired because he refused to violate the rights of American citizens?
How one enforces a warrant is defined in regulation.he never said he would enforce a regulation
with that said, we see xiden doing that daily
False. No one’s rights were going to be violated.So the fact that her refused to violate the rights of American citizens means he's insurrectionist?
this is sort of why folks call you a propagandist…you think brownshirts that burn a church down, break in the dept of tresuary and attempt to break in the white house and over throw the president are peaceful protestorsI think you're talking about the federal agents in Laffayette Park who violated peoples 1st amendment right to peacefully assemble in a public space.
Total disconnect from reality and terminal TDS. Seek professional help. Of course you hate that whistleblowers are turning in the FBI for illegal and biased acts.Post 27 shows a lot of pro-Trump bias. As do you, and Jim Jordan and the FBI agents who were dismissed.
It’s no coincidence that the only people calling the FBI biased are themselves heavily biased for Trump. It’s because the FBI isn’t biased. You are.
You realize that the agents like the police, serve as the one's to protect peoples rights. Such as when they read them their Miranda rights, or restrict a search to areas that they determine are legal.If he thinks it violates someone's rights, yes he can. Do you believe government employees should obey laws to imprison innocent people?
That only applies to legal warrants.How one enforces a warrant is defined in regulation.
How about the cop who asphyxiated George Floyd? Whose rights was he protecting?You realize that the agents like the police, serve as the one's to protect peoples rights. Such as when they read them their Miranda rights, or restrict a search to areas that they determine are legal.
Obviously wrong.False. No one’s rights were going to be violated.
haha he didn’t refuse to serve a warrant. He objected to the SWAT team raids to serve them on people for misdemeanorsHow one enforces a warrant is defined in regulation.
Actually that's what every law does.Do you believe government employees should obey laws to imprison innocent people?
It’s amazing how many of you think it’s illegal to prosecute Trump supporters for breaking the law.Total disconnect from reality and terminal TDS. Seek professional help. Of course you hate that whistleblowers are turning in the FBI for illegal and biased acts.
Who had what rights violated and how?Obviously wrong.
Then were you lying when you posted the opposite?In this case, they are criminals.
They break laws all the time, douchebag. Their reputation is shit.
Yes, that would be the case in an FBI that wasn't a nest of traitors. They haven't broken 1/100th as many laws as BLM and Antifa.
"Jim Jordan says."Progs deny that the FBI is infested with progs. Here's the proof that it is.
Jim Jordan: FBI 'purging' staffers with conservative viewpoints
Republican Rep. Jim Jordan is accusing the FBI of purging conservatives and whistleblowers who have come forward to expose political bias.www.dailymail.co.uk
Republican Rep. Jim Jordan is accusing the FBI of purging conservatives and whistleblowers who have come forward to expose political bias.Fox News Digital reported Thursday that Jordan wrote a letter to FBI executive assistant director of the Human Resources branch Jennifer Moore to highlight cases of alleged retaliation and demand she sit for an interview with House Judiciary Committee Republicans.'During the course of this investigation, we have received protected whistleblower disclosures that the FBI is engaging in a "purge" of employees with conservative views by revoking their security clearances and indefinitely suspending these employees,' Jordan told Moore.She was subjected to his letter, Jordan explained, because 'many of the formal notices' had been signed by her.He told Moore he had information indicating she had 'retaliated against at least one whistleblower who has made protected disclosures to Congress.'Jordan told Fox that individual shared with Judiciary Committee Republicans that the Justice Department was labeling some parents who showed up to school board meetings a threat allowing the DOJ to 'prosecute them when appropriate.'
Wrong.Actually that's what every law does.
Police must have probable cause, and the means should be proportionate to the severity of the crime.People are presumed "innocent, until, proven guilty" and nobody is proven guilty before they are arrested.
There wasn't even any legitimate reason to arrest any of these FBI victims.Therefor in the eyes of the law, all people arrested are "innocent people"
And the law dictates that innocent people get arrested.
