- Jul 21, 2009
- 133,140
- 69,822
Doubtful, but you can go with that.You mean "most legal experts" who are LIBs claim charges are unlikely.Wrong Flopper....within the Espionage Act is a crime of 'negligence' which does not require an intentional act. Barry has already publicly declared Hillary was negligent...
Easy....there aren't going to be any charges. There would have to be something egregious, like......Hillary walking out 8 binders of classfied materials to show the dude she was schtuping. There's nothing even remotely close to the level of charges here.
Which is why most legal experts who've been asked indicate that charges are highly unlikely.
There are as many or more experts who say charges are very likely.
The fun part will be when the FBI recommends a series of felony charges be brought against Hillary this board will be flooded with fucking LIBs claiming the FBI is corrupt. You wait.
When the opposite happens the only cons you'll see here are the die hard conspiracists crying about how the fix was in.
The point is, we already the DOJ is corrupt and Hillary is guilty as fuck. What happens will piss off one side the other. If she's nailed you pursues will scream like Banshees, and we'll be laughing like Hyenas. If she gets away with it, you pud-knockers will claim that justice was done, even though it wasn't, and all it will do is cost Hillary the election. It's a win-win for us.
![muahaha :muahaha: :muahaha:](/styles/smilies/muahaha.gif)