FBI is wrapping up e-mail investigation with no evidence Clinton willfully violated the law

[The Rabbi]

Again, there is no evidence that is true.

Bahahaha!

"there is no evidence which is true"

In the real world we refer to that as a "state of denial".

You could have a headline that read "Hillary Indicted on Email Charges" and libs would explain the source was biased, it wasnt really an indictment, it was a vast right wing conspiracy, etc etc.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You have no idea of the content of the classified emails in question, why they were classified, by whom or when they were classified. Your argument is total supposition

Wrong again. Had you been paying attention instead of skipping all the factual posts you would have understood my argument.

We know 22 of them were deemed too damaging to be let out into the open air. Four of them were classified at the time of origination. A total of 2,079 of them were deemed classified by intelligence and other sources. It was Hillary's job to discern which emails were classified and which weren't.

I have plenty of idea what those emails contain. Classified information. My argument is based on pure evidence, and yours on emotion.

Except they aren't factual posts. They're speculative posts.
None were classified until their review for release. The 22 were upgraded to TS so they could not be released at all. State has said they weren't marked classified at the time. What you don't know is why any of them were classified. It could simply be because the information while routine may be critical to ongoing operations and therefore cannot be released.

We will know soon enough.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Except they aren't factual posts. They're speculative posts.

Are you one of Hillary's campaign operatives?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

How many of Clinton's emails already existed on the State server?

Only the ones Hillary deemed "work related". Get it now?

How many of Clinton's emails already existed on the State server?

Only the ones Hillary deemed "work related". Get it now?

What?

 

[TemplarKormac]

None were classified until their review for release.

Weren't you the one telling me I had no idea of what the content of those emails were? And you do?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Again, there is no evidence that is true.

Bahahaha!

"there is no evidence which is true"

In the real world we refer to that as a "state of denial".

Has any official confirmed that claim or do you always accept nutjob reports?

 

[TemplarKormac]

How many of Clinton's emails already existed on the State server?

Only the ones Hillary deemed "work related". Get it now?

How many of Clinton's emails already existed on the State server?

Only the ones Hillary deemed "work related". Get it now?

What?

Apparently not.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

None were classified until their review for release.

Weren't you the one telling me I had no idea of what the content of those emails were? And you do?

That's my point fool. While you're dancing around calling people criminals, you never considered anything else.

 

[mudwhistle]

You have no idea of the content of the classified emails in question, why they were classified, by whom or when they were classified. Your argument is total supposition

Wrong again. Had you been paying attention instead of skipping all the factual posts you would have understood my argument.

We know 22 of them were deemed too damaging to be let out into the open air. Four of them were classified at the time of origination. A total of 2,079 of them were deemed classified by intelligence and other sources. It was Hillary's job to discern which emails were classified and which weren't.

I have plenty of idea what those emails contain. Classified information. My argument is based on pure evidence, and yours on emotion.

Except they aren't factual posts. They're speculative posts.
None were classified until their review for release. The 22 were upgraded to TS so they could not be released at all. State has said they weren't marked classified at the time. What you don't know is why any of them were classified. It could simply be because the information while routine may be critical to ongoing operations and therefore cannot be released.

We will know soon enough.

Any document discussing foreign affairs is considered classified automatically. State Department stuff, ya know? It doesn’t need to be officially classified by anyone.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Except they aren't factual posts. They're speculative posts.

Are you one of Hillary's campaign operatives?

Are you a RW rube?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Again, there is no evidence that is true.

Bahahaha!

"there is no evidence which is true"

In the real world we refer to that as a "state of denial".

Has any official confirmed that claim or do you always accept nutjob reports?

Those aren't "nutjob reports." That's actual evidence confirmed by various officials. Liberals like you will readily dismiss evidence when it puts you in a quandary.

Do you always accept what Hillary says?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Except they aren't factual posts. They're speculative posts.

Are you one of Hillary's campaign operatives?

Are you a RW rube?

I am your worst nightmare. I am Batman.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You have no idea of the content of the classified emails in question, why they were classified, by whom or when they were classified. Your argument is total supposition

Wrong again. Had you been paying attention instead of skipping all the factual posts you would have understood my argument.

We know 22 of them were deemed too damaging to be let out into the open air. Four of them were classified at the time of origination. A total of 2,079 of them were deemed classified by intelligence and other sources. It was Hillary's job to discern which emails were classified and which weren't.

I have plenty of idea what those emails contain. Classified information. My argument is based on pure evidence, and yours on emotion.

Except they aren't factual posts. They're speculative posts.
None were classified until their review for release. The 22 were upgraded to TS so they could not be released at all. State has said they weren't marked classified at the time. What you don't know is why any of them were classified. It could simply be because the information while routine may be critical to ongoing operations and therefore cannot be released.

We will know soon enough.

Any document discussing foreign affairs is considered classified automatically. State Department stuff, ya know? It doesn’t need to be officially classified by anyone.

Not foreign affairs. That would be everything at state. Try reading it again.

 

[TemplarKormac]

The one think you haven't done, Hutch, is prove me wrong. I'm still waiting.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Again, there is no evidence that is true.

Bahahaha!

"there is no evidence which is true"

In the real world we refer to that as a "state of denial".

Has any official confirmed that claim or do you always accept nutjob reports?

Those aren't "nutjob reports." That's actual evidence confirmed by various officials. Liberals like you will readily dismiss evidence when it puts you in a quandary.

Do you always accept what Hillary says?

Officials? Who?
What credible news source is reporting that?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The one think you haven't done, Hutch, is prove me wrong. I'm still waiting.

I don't need to prove you wrong. You did that all by yourself.

 

[TemplarKormac]

None were classified until their review for release.

Weren't you the one telling me I had no idea of what the content of those emails were? And you do?

That's my point fool. While you're dancing around calling people criminals, you never considered anything else.

Your point? What was the point exactly? That I know nothing and you know everything?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Again, there is no evidence that is true.

Bahahaha!

"there is no evidence which is true"

In the real world we refer to that as a "state of denial".

Has any official confirmed that claim or do you always accept nutjob reports?

Those aren't "nutjob reports." That's actual evidence confirmed by various officials. Liberals like you will readily dismiss evidence when it puts you in a quandary.

Do you always accept what Hillary says?

Officials? Who?
What credible news source is reporting that?

I got my points from the Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, various government websites, citations from Cornell School of Law, former US Attorney General Micheal Mukasey and Assistant US District Attorney Andrew McCarthy.

I don't get all my information from the news. I do research.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You have no idea of the content of the classified emails in question, why they were classified, by whom or when they were classified. Your argument is total supposition

Wrong again. Had you been paying attention instead of skipping all the factual posts you would have understood my argument.

We know 22 of them were deemed too damaging to be let out into the open air. Four of them were classified at the time of origination. A total of 2,079 of them were deemed classified by intelligence and other sources. It was Hillary's job to discern which emails were classified and which weren't.

I have plenty of idea what those emails contain. Classified information. My argument is based on pure evidence, and yours on emotion.

Except they aren't factual posts. They're speculative posts.
None were classified until their review for release. The 22 were upgraded to TS so they could not be released at all. State has said they weren't marked classified at the time. What you don't know is why any of them were classified. It could simply be because the information while routine may be critical to ongoing operations and therefore cannot be released.

We will know soon enough.

Any document discussing foreign affairs is considered classified automatically. State Department stuff, ya know? It doesn’t need to be officially classified by anyone.

Not foreign affairs. That would be everything at state. Try reading it again.

Nope.

https://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dos-class.pdf

 

[Siete]

Hutch .. leave the girls to their own design. This email conspiracy morphs into other conspiracy excuses which the fully accept as facts. Ten years from now they'll still be yammering Clinton is guilty, and nothing can change that.