Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 29,532
- 13,729
- 973
Sorry, they’re still making the same mistake. These articles are all about the same topic and all making the same mistake. There’s a difference between section 702 spying, and title I FISA warrants.Dan Bongino (ex Secret Service) confirmed that the FBI also uses the 2-hop rule.
Is there a difference between the NSA accessing meta-data and the FBI accessing the NSA meta-data?
I don't think so...
Here is another pertinent article. You still haven't show a "LAW" that prohibits agencies from using the 2-hop rule, because its too convenient to use to spy on people you're suspicious of, like Obama was suspicious of Trump.
How the FBI hops – IOTW Report
iotwreport.com
The NSA was doing two hop surveillance on 702 targets as authorized by the renewed patriot act. This is limited to targets outside the US.
Title I warrants are for targets in the US and don’t enable hopping, which are done by the FBI.
![themarketswork.com](https://themarketswork.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/chasing-the-markets-1241622-600x315-cropped.jpg)
FISA Surveillance – Title I & III and Section 702
NSA has decided that its Section 702 foreign intelligence surveillance activities will no longer include any upstream internet communications that are solely "about" a foreign intelligence target. Instead, this surveillance will now be limited to only those communications that are directly "to"...
The article you sourced is a good one with lots of links, those links all confirm that the hops are part of section 702. Not title I
Finally, we are talking about metadata. That is information that is deemed “on the outside of the envelope”. It’s not the content of texts and emails. Is the sender, recipient and data of the communications.