FBI Paid Out $42 Million a Year to Confidential Human Sources – Including Thugs Who Set Up Trump, Whitmer Kidnap Hoaxers, and Others

I don’t mind the idea of paying CIs…but that seems like a lot of money
 
Really feeble. The fucking quotes are copied from the articles, duh. They say they say.
You can't dispute or refute what they say.
What? Stuff like “we all know” ?

Your claims about Rogers for instance are not shown anywhere.

Your claims about the IG are cherry picked and ignore elements of his report that refute your nonsense
 
It is if you’re colluding about a crime.
conspiracy is…not colluding. Clearly you never read the Mueller report or paid attention to his testimony…he outlined this in detail for you dembots
 
conspiracy is…not colluding. Clearly you never read the Mueller report or paid attention to his testimony…he outlined this in detail for you dembots
Distinction without a difference.
 
Distinction without a difference.
well actually mueller made clear that colluding is not a crime..conspiracy is a crime…additionally it requires at least two parties agreeing to commit a crime…and then of course steps towards committing such crime…the crime etc
 
well actually mueller made clear that colluding is not a crime..conspiracy is a crime…additionally it requires at least two parties agreeing to commit a crime…and then of course steps towards committing such crime…the crime etc
There's no functional difference between collusion and conspiracy.
 
in the law there is…but when did any of you dembots care about the rule of law?
The doesn't mention "collusion". It's a colloquial term with the same meaning as conspiracy.

You're not very smart.
 
if you are talking in the non-legal meaning…sure i’ll give you that
Nope. They carry the same meaning. It's just the law uses one term and not the other. There is no functional difference. If you're colluding, you're conspiring.

This isn't complicated, even the world's dumbest lawyer like yourself should understand it.
 
Nope. They carry the same meaning. It's just the law uses one term and not the other. There is no functional difference. If you're colluding, you're conspiring.

This isn't complicated, even the world's dumbest lawyer like yourself should understand it.
no the law requires certain elements to be proven to be convicted of conspiracy.
 
well actually mueller made clear that colluding is not a crime..conspiracy is a crime…additionally it requires at least two parties agreeing to commit a crime…and then of course steps towards committing such crime…the crime etc
And he detailed 10 incidences of conspiracy saying that the DOJ couldn't prosecute a sitting President
 
conspiracy is…not colluding. Clearly you never read the Mueller report or paid attention to his testimony…he outlined this in detail for you dembots
Tell us what you think the difference is
 
What? Stuff like “we all know” ?
Your claims about Rogers for instance are not shown anywhere.
Your claims about the IG are cherry picked and ignore elements of his report that refute your nonsense
1. You keep denying facts. That just shows how dishonest you are. You can't handle the truth.
Admiral Rogers isn't going to admit that he tipped Trump off that his bosses (Obama, Clapper, and the SECDEF) were spying on him, duh.

Who is Adm. Mike Rogers? Unsung ‘hero’ alerted President Trump to illegal spying​

"On March 4, 2017, just 43 days after taking office, President Donald Trump tweeted: “Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!”
The person who initially tipped off Trump (on Nov. 17, 2016) that communications from Trump Tower were being tapped was Adm. Mike Rogers, then-head of the National Security Agency (NSA)"


2. "We all know" you're a fucking moron. What is squishy about Barr testifying that "spying did occur"?
The IG report was damning. You ignore all the elements and never quote any because they indict the FBI's bias.

Barr testifies 'spying did occur' on Trump campaign​

"spying on a political campaign is a big deal."
 
1. You keep denying facts. That just shows how dishonest you are. You can't handle the truth.
Admiral Rogers isn't going to admit that he tipped Trump off that his bosses (Obama, Clapper, and the SECDEF) were spying on him, duh.

Who is Adm. Mike Rogers? Unsung ‘hero’ alerted President Trump to illegal spying​

"On March 4, 2017, just 43 days after taking office, President Donald Trump tweeted: “Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!”
The person who initially tipped off Trump (on Nov. 17, 2016) that communications from Trump Tower were being tapped was Adm. Mike Rogers, then-head of the National Security Agency (NSA)"


2. "We all know" you're a fucking moron. What is squishy about Barr testifying that "spying did occur"?
The IG report was damning. You ignore all the elements and never quote any because they indict the FBI's bias.

Barr testifies 'spying did occur' on Trump campaign​

"spying on a political campaign is a big deal."
You just admitted your claims about Rogers are unsubstantiated.

And what Bill the Bagman claims means nothing.

Hell he lied about the Mueller Report
 
You just admitted your claims about Rogers are unsubstantiated.
And what Bill the Bagman claims means nothing.
Hell he lied about the Mueller Report
1. Rogers told Trump he was being spied on, Barr said under oath that Trump was spied on. That's all the proof I need, you have no proof to the contrary. Just bullshit.
2. Barr didn't lie about the Mueller report, there was no indictment, duh. Barr TESTIFIED UNDER OATH THAT SPYING DID OCCUR. That's more proof than you have.
 

Forum List

Back
Top