Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Especially non-profits.
Unfortunately I have become very cynical of charitable organizations over the years.
As a vendor supplying a product to them...I see the rampant waste that occurs in any situation where you have people in charge of money they didn't personally earn.
I can mention no names, but let me say there are national charitable organizations that purposely choose more expensive materials and production processes so a certain dollar amount can be reached.
On the B2B business it is the opposite - projects are designed/modified to lower cost and stay within a certain budget...bureaucrats design/modify projects to raise costs to make sure every penny budgeted is spent.
Especially non-profits.
Unfortunately I have become very cynical of charitable organizations over the years.
As a vendor supplying a product to them...I see the rampant waste that occurs in any situation where you have people in charge of money they didn't personally earn.
I can mention no names, but let me say there are national charitable organizations that purposely choose more expensive materials and production processes so a certain dollar amount can be reached.
On the B2B business it is the opposite - projects are designed/modified to lower cost and stay within a certain budget...bureaucrats design/modify projects to raise costs to make sure every penny budgeted is spent.
And to think, there's a whole lot of people out there who want the government to administer more healthcare, etc. If there's any entity that operates in an inefficient manner, it's the government, on just about every level.
You are simply being the useful idiot that both sides need in order to keep spending us into oblivion. By insisting on turning the issue into a merriam webster circle jerk, you insure that no real focus is put on the REAL issue oif spending.
You are a prime example of why those we have entrusted with the stewardship of our money and our nation are failing so miserably in their duties. So many of them - just like you - refuse to address the real issue and simply piss and moan about semantics and defining things and labeling things "correctly."
Well done.
You are simply being the useful idiot that both sides need in order to keep spending us into oblivion. By insisting on turning the issue into a merriam webster circle jerk, you insure that no real focus is put on the REAL issue oif spending.
You are a prime example of why those we have entrusted with the stewardship of our money and our nation are failing so miserably in their duties. So many of them - just like you - refuse to address the real issue and simply piss and moan about semantics and defining things and labeling things "correctly."
Well done.
What would you suggest in the way of actual spending cuts?
Will automatic spending cuts have a devastating impact on the U.S. economy. No.
What will happen is that bureaucrats will deliberately try to spread "the hurt" as far and wide as possible in order to defend their inflated budgets.
They will not cut waste, they will cut services. They want to inflict as much pain as possible so we come crawling back screaming uncle and throwing dollars at them - BEGGING them to take more of our money - just to make the pain stop.
We have the wrong people, motivated by the wrong reasons, making the wrong choices.
Will automatic spending cuts have a devastating impact on the U.S. economy. No.
What will happen is that bureaucrats will deliberately try to spread "the hurt" as far and wide as possible in order to defend their inflated budgets.
They will not cut waste, they will cut services. They want to inflict as much pain as possible so we come crawling back screaming uncle and throwing dollars at them - BEGGING them to take more of our money - just to make the pain stop.
We have the wrong people, motivated by the wrong reasons, making the wrong choices.
Those "services" are part of the economy. If it takes a businessman longer to reach his destination as a result of service cuts..it has an impact, and a very real one, to the cost of doing business. Likewise with products going to market. With people trying to get licenses. With businesses that depend on mail. And that's just the direct impact to the economy. There are other things that will have an impact in time.
This isn't good.
But it might be what's needed.
Will automatic spending cuts have a devastating impact on the U.S. economy. No.
What will happen is that bureaucrats will deliberately try to spread "the hurt" as far and wide as possible in order to defend their inflated budgets.
They will not cut waste, they will cut services. They want to inflict as much pain as possible so we come crawling back screaming uncle and throwing dollars at them - BEGGING them to take more of our money - just to make the pain stop.
We have the wrong people, motivated by the wrong reasons, making the wrong choices.
I wonder why Obama suggested it, signed it into law and said he would veto any attempts to change it?
Will automatic spending cuts have a devastating impact on the U.S. economy. No.
What will happen is that bureaucrats will deliberately try to spread "the hurt" as far and wide as possible in order to defend their inflated budgets.
They will not cut waste, they will cut services. They want to inflict as much pain as possible so we come crawling back screaming uncle and throwing dollars at them - BEGGING them to take more of our money - just to make the pain stop.
We have the wrong people, motivated by the wrong reasons, making the wrong choices.
I wonder why Obama suggested it, signed it into law and said he would veto any attempts to change it?
Obama wanted to make it suck so bad that both sides would have to come together and make it right.
Why hasn't it worked out? Well, he probably wasn't counting on Tea Party Republicans loving things that suck.
The FDA will do more than 2,000 fewer inspections. Sucks for everyone. Fewer inspections means greater health risks and lost revenues from slaughterhouses and other things being shut down, for instance.
National Parks will either be open a lot less or will be closed altogether. Lost revenue.
The military sees 800,000 employees beginning to take one furlough day a week. That means less spending by military folks, which means lost revenue.
The sequester "cuts" actually hit real everyday people pretty significantly and I find the ignorance of some people here appalling. Unless you've got your head literally up your ass, if you check up and down all the people you know and the people in your family and extended family, you'll be able to identify actual people who will be affected by this.
Of course the Tea Party loves it, this will cause a lot of problems with an economy that is really wanting to stretch its legs now, which is something Republicans really don't want because then they think President Obama stands to benefit from a good economy.
So we have America cutting the end of her nose off today in order to spite herself, and it's because Republicans simply will not even negotiate any revenue increasing measures even though the President is prepared to sign off on significant spending cuts.
Will automatic spending cuts have a devastating impact on the U.S. economy. No.
What will happen is that bureaucrats will deliberately try to spread "the hurt" as far and wide as possible in order to defend their inflated budgets.
They will not cut waste, they will cut services. They want to inflict as much pain as possible so we come crawling back screaming uncle and throwing dollars at them - BEGGING them to take more of our money - just to make the pain stop.
We have the wrong people, motivated by the wrong reasons, making the wrong choices.
I wonder why Obama suggested it, signed it into law and said he would veto any attempts to change it?
Obama wanted to make it suck so bad that both sides would have to come together and make it right.
Why hasn't it worked out? Well, he probably wasn't counting on Tea Party Republicans loving things that suck.
The FDA will do more than 2,000 fewer inspections. Sucks for everyone. Fewer inspections means greater health risks and lost revenues from slaughterhouses and other things being shut down, for instance.
National Parks will either be open a lot less or will be closed altogether. Lost revenue.
The military sees 800,000 employees beginning to take one furlough day a week. That means less spending by military folks, which means lost revenue.
The sequester "cuts" actually hit real everyday people pretty significantly and I find the ignorance of some people here appalling. Unless you've got your head literally up your ass, if you check up and down all the people you know and the people in your family and extended family, you'll be able to identify actual people who will be affected by this.
Of course the Tea Party loves it, this will cause a lot of problems with an economy that is really wanting to stretch its legs now, which is something Republicans really don't want because then they think President Obama stands to benefit from a good economy.
So we have America cutting the end of her nose off today in order to spite herself, and it's because Republicans simply will not even negotiate any revenue increasing measures even though the President is prepared to sign off on significant spending cuts.
I wonder why Obama suggested it, signed it into law and said he would veto any attempts to change it?
Obama wanted to make it suck so bad that both sides would have to come together and make it right.
Why hasn't it worked out? Well, he probably wasn't counting on Tea Party Republicans loving things that suck.
The FDA will do more than 2,000 fewer inspections. Sucks for everyone. Fewer inspections means greater health risks and lost revenues from slaughterhouses and other things being shut down, for instance.
National Parks will either be open a lot less or will be closed altogether. Lost revenue.
The military sees 800,000 employees beginning to take one furlough day a week. That means less spending by military folks, which means lost revenue.
The sequester "cuts" actually hit real everyday people pretty significantly and I find the ignorance of some people here appalling. Unless you've got your head literally up your ass, if you check up and down all the people you know and the people in your family and extended family, you'll be able to identify actual people who will be affected by this.
Of course the Tea Party loves it, this will cause a lot of problems with an economy that is really wanting to stretch its legs now, which is something Republicans really don't want because then they think President Obama stands to benefit from a good economy.
So we have America cutting the end of her nose off today in order to spite herself, and it's because Republicans simply will not even negotiate any revenue increasing measures even though the President is prepared to sign off on significant spending cuts.
Ever heard the saying of. "be careful what you ask for, you just might get it"?
How smart was that move by Obama? Proof he isn't qualified for the job. Rather than lead, he'll just throw out some shit that is bad enough no one wants it and they'll be forced to come up with something better.........but they didn't. When is he going to lead?
Obama wanted to make it suck so bad that both sides would have to come together and make it right.
Why hasn't it worked out? Well, he probably wasn't counting on Tea Party Republicans loving things that suck.
The FDA will do more than 2,000 fewer inspections. Sucks for everyone. Fewer inspections means greater health risks and lost revenues from slaughterhouses and other things being shut down, for instance.
National Parks will either be open a lot less or will be closed altogether. Lost revenue.
The military sees 800,000 employees beginning to take one furlough day a week. That means less spending by military folks, which means lost revenue.
The sequester "cuts" actually hit real everyday people pretty significantly and I find the ignorance of some people here appalling. Unless you've got your head literally up your ass, if you check up and down all the people you know and the people in your family and extended family, you'll be able to identify actual people who will be affected by this.
Of course the Tea Party loves it, this will cause a lot of problems with an economy that is really wanting to stretch its legs now, which is something Republicans really don't want because then they think President Obama stands to benefit from a good economy.
So we have America cutting the end of her nose off today in order to spite herself, and it's because Republicans simply will not even negotiate any revenue increasing measures even though the President is prepared to sign off on significant spending cuts.
Ever heard the saying of. "be careful what you ask for, you just might get it"?
How smart was that move by Obama? Proof he isn't qualified for the job. Rather than lead, he'll just throw out some shit that is bad enough no one wants it and they'll be forced to come up with something better.........but they didn't. When is he going to lead?
So you don't WANT spending restraint?
First you blast him for spending
Now you blast him for NOT spending????
I'm guessing you're a glass-is-half-empty kinda guy.
ONCE AGAIN.. THEY ARE NOT SPENDING CUTS... The are slight reductions in increases... JEEZ....
Nah, I think I'm getting it loud and clear.You are missing my point
Nah, I think I'm getting it loud and clear.You are missing my point
That commie, Kenyan, moooslim is bad.
go pound sand
go pound sand
oh no ..... PLEASE .... anything but the dreaded "pound sand."
You say you want spending reductions.
You say Obama orchestrated these spending reductions
and then you say he isn't leading?
Did he lead us to these spending reductions?
You said he did - were you lying?
go pound sand
oh no ..... PLEASE .... anything but the dreaded "pound sand."
You say you want spending reductions.
You say Obama orchestrated these spending reductions
and then you say he isn't leading?
Did he lead us to these spending reductions?
You said he did - were you lying?
OK, fuck you. Feel better?
go pound sand
oh no ..... PLEASE .... anything but the dreaded "pound sand."
You say you want spending reductions.
You say Obama orchestrated these spending reductions
and then you say he isn't leading?
Did he lead us to these spending reductions?
You said he did - were you lying?
OK, fuck you. Feel better?
oh no ..... PLEASE .... anything but the dreaded "pound sand."
You say you want spending reductions.
You say Obama orchestrated these spending reductions
and then you say he isn't leading?
Did he lead us to these spending reductions?
You said he did - were you lying?
OK, fuck you. Feel better?
why don't you save your vulgarities for your neg rep message you give me when I demonstrate what an idiot you are.
