Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No it wasn't because I was comparing apples to apples, and you weren't.
Non top exec get bonuses, and other things as well.
If you calculate the total bonuses, options, and all other perks of the non top execs, and then compare it to the top execs than you are comparing apples to apples.
I was comparing "X" to "X" not "X+Y+Z" to "X".
P.S. You are a douche bag.
AmwayMike once again demonstrates why we love him so much.
If total compensation in the private sector is comprised of X+Y+Z, AmwayMike knows that he will lose his argument because Government workers only get paid X
Sneaky little weasel isn't he?
Here I will go slower for a retarded person like yourself.
I wasn't comparing the private to the public in those posts.
I was making the point that top exec compensation in these large corporations are very small compared to the total compensation for all employees.
I realize that reading comprehension is a challenge for you.
I typed slowly so perhaps you will understand, perhaps not.
AmwayMike once again demonstrates why we love him so much.
If total compensation in the private sector is comprised of X+Y+Z, AmwayMike knows that he will lose his argument because Government workers only get paid X
Sneaky little weasel isn't he?
Here I will go slower for a retarded person like yourself.
I wasn't comparing the private to the public in those posts.
I was making the point that top exec compensation in these large corporations are very small compared to the total compensation for all employees.
I realize that reading comprehension is a challenge for you.
I typed slowly so perhaps you will understand, perhaps not.
And in making that comparison you left out the bonuses and stock options that make up the bulk of executive compensation
What a lying weasel
No it wasn't because I was comparing apples to apples, and you weren't.
Non top exec get bonuses, and other things as well.
If you calculate the total bonuses, options, and all other perks of the non top execs, and then compare it to the top execs than you are comparing apples to apples.
I was comparing "X" to "X" not "X+Y+Z" to "X".
P.S. You are a douche bag.
AmwayMike once again demonstrates why we love him so much.
If total compensation in the private sector is comprised of X+Y+Z, AmwayMike knows that he will lose his argument because Government workers only get paid X
Sneaky little weasel isn't he?
Here I will go slower for a retarded person like yourself.
I wasn't comparing the private to the public in those posts.
I was making the point that top exec compensation in these large corporations are very small compared to the total compensation for all employees.
I realize that reading comprehension is a challenge for you.
I typed slowly so perhaps you will understand, perhaps not.
Ahhh yes, the patented CON$ervative Dumb Act.I don't have to.Fine. Then you research those numbers.
Logic dictates that if the private sector's wages + bonuses + stock options were LESS than the government's wages + bonuses + stock options they would not have been left out in the first place.
You see, to the Cynical mind you reveal the truth by what you omit without the Cynic having to know the exact numbers you left out.
Get it?
Government workers get stock options????
Rather than admit FAUX was being dishonest by omitting private sector bonuses and stock options from their calculation of private sector pay packages because government does not pay them, you play dumb. Obviously you concede that had the whole private sector pay package been considered, the private sector would have been shown to pay more than government which doesn't fit the GOP hate media template.
Thank you.
No it wasn't because I was comparing apples to apples, and you weren't.
Non top exec get bonuses, and other things as well.
If you calculate the total bonuses, options, and all other perks of the non top execs, and then compare it to the top execs than you are comparing apples to apples.
I was comparing "X" to "X" not "X+Y+Z" to "X".
P.S. You are a douche bag.
AmwayMike once again demonstrates why we love him so much.
If total compensation in the private sector is comprised of X+Y+Z, AmwayMike knows that he will lose his argument because Government workers only get paid X
Sneaky little weasel isn't he?
Here I will go slower for a retarded person like yourself.
I wasn't comparing the private to the public in those posts.
I was making the point that top exec compensation in these large corporations are very small compared to the total compensation for all employees.
I realize that reading comprehension is a challenge for you.
I typed slowly so perhaps you will understand, perhaps not.
I already did in this very thread, read some of the past posts here. I provided a link that showed that an executive at Lehman got an average of $60 million per year since 2000, name one gov executive who gets that kind of compensation!!!Rather than admit FAUX was being dishonest by omitting private sector bonuses and stock options from their calculation of private sector pay packages because government does not pay them, you play dumb. Obviously you concede that had the whole private sector pay package been considered, the private sector would have been shown to pay more than government which doesn't fit the GOP hate media template.
Thank you.
Can you provide any data which backs up your claims?
The financial statements of public companies are required to account for all exec compensation, including expensing of stock options. Please provide something that shows how including expensee stock options would cause private sector pay to exceed public employees (otherwise, you are just blowing a lot of hot air).
I already did in this very thread, read some of the past posts here. I provided a link that showed that an executive at Lehman got an average of $60 million per year since 2000, name one gov executive who gets that kind of compensation!!!Rather than admit FAUX was being dishonest by omitting private sector bonuses and stock options from their calculation of private sector pay packages because government does not pay them, you play dumb. Obviously you concede that had the whole private sector pay package been considered, the private sector would have been shown to pay more than government which doesn't fit the GOP hate media template.
Thank you.
Can you provide any data which backs up your claims?
The financial statements of public companies are required to account for all exec compensation, including expensing of stock options. Please provide something that shows how including expensee stock options would cause private sector pay to exceed public employees (otherwise, you are just blowing a lot of hot air).
I already did in this very thread, read some of the past posts here. I provided a link that showed that an executive at Lehman got an average of $60 million per year since 2000, name one gov executive who gets that kind of compensation!!!
Amway has ripped off millions of people for several decades, to the tune of 10s of billions of dollars.CMike is simple minded
You must keep it simple for him.
CMike, you are dumb as a stump.
Don't put him down...
He has built himself a formidable Amway empire
Amway has ripped off millions of people for several decades, to the tune of 10s of billions of dollars.CMike is simple minded
You must keep it simple for him.
CMike, you are dumb as a stump.
Don't put him down...
He has built himself a formidable Amway empire
Amway is a scam, and here's why: Amway pays out as little money as they can get away with, so they support the higher level IBOs ripping off their downline via the tool scam.
As a result, about 99% of IBOs operate at a net loss, while the top 1% make several TIMES more from their Amway tool scam than from the Amway products. This was made illegal in the UK in 2008, but our FTC is unable to pull their heads out of their butts to stop it here.
Read about it on this website: thenetprofitgroup.yolasite.com and forward the information to everyone you know, so they don't get scammed.
I already did in this very thread, read some of the past posts here. I provided a link that showed that an executive at Lehman got an average of $60 million per year since 2000, name one gov executive who gets that kind of compensation!!!Rather than admit FAUX was being dishonest by omitting private sector bonuses and stock options from their calculation of private sector pay packages because government does not pay them, you play dumb. Obviously you concede that had the whole private sector pay package been considered, the private sector would have been shown to pay more than government which doesn't fit the GOP hate media template.
Thank you.
Can you provide any data which backs up your claims?
The financial statements of public companies are required to account for all exec compensation, including expensing of stock options. Please provide something that shows how including expensee stock options would cause private sector pay to exceed public employees (otherwise, you are just blowing a lot of hot air).
I already did in this very thread, read some of the past posts here. I provided a link that showed that an executive at Lehman got an average of $60 million per year since 2000, name one gov executive who gets that kind of compensation!!!Can you provide any data which backs up your claims?
The financial statements of public companies are required to account for all exec compensation, including expensing of stock options. Please provide something that shows how including expensee stock options would cause private sector pay to exceed public employees (otherwise, you are just blowing a lot of hot air).
Why are you so unable to focus?
The information needed based on what we are discussing is the annual total compensation of top execs of let's say GM, compared tot he total compensation for the entire work force.
Focus.
I already provided the data to compare the salaries and wages of the top execs compared to the total work force. You wanted to add in more, so go for it.
Maybe you should take your own advice and FOCUS on the title of this thread!!!!I already did in this very thread, read some of the past posts here. I provided a link that showed that an executive at Lehman got an average of $60 million per year since 2000, name one gov executive who gets that kind of compensation!!!Can you provide any data which backs up your claims?
The financial statements of public companies are required to account for all exec compensation, including expensing of stock options. Please provide something that shows how including expensee stock options would cause private sector pay to exceed public employees (otherwise, you are just blowing a lot of hot air).
Why are you so unable to focus?
The information needed based on what we are discussing is the annual total compensation of top execs of let's say GM, compared tot he total compensation for the entire work force.
Focus.
I already provided the data to compare the salaries and wages of the top execs compared to the total work force. You wanted to add in more, so go for it.
I have no comment about Amyway. I don't know enough about it.
However, if you want to know about sewer systems and the brain damage that can occur due to the noxious fumes, SewerWorkerWinger is your man.
I have no comment about Amyway. I don't know enough about it.
However, if you want to know about sewer systems and the brain damage that can occur due to the noxious fumes, SewerWorkerWinger is your man.
I am proud of my lengthy service in providing sanitation to the masses. You may thank me every time you flush.
AmwayMike however is ashamed of his chosen profession in door to door sales. Personally, I prefer sanitation. It is more honorable
Maybe you should take your own advice and FOCUS on the title of this thread!!!!I already did in this very thread, read some of the past posts here. I provided a link that showed that an executive at Lehman got an average of $60 million per year since 2000, name one gov executive who gets that kind of compensation!!!
Why are you so unable to focus?
The information needed based on what we are discussing is the annual total compensation of top execs of let's say GM, compared tot he total compensation for the entire work force.
Focus.
I already provided the data to compare the salaries and wages of the top execs compared to the total work force. You wanted to add in more, so go for it.
And the TOTAL compensation of the execs INCLUDES bonuses and stock options which are significantly higher than the bonuses and stock options of the rest of the work force, which is exactly why you dishonestly and deliberately left them out. Your dumb ACT fools no one!