Federal Judge Tells U.S. Supreme Court to ****!

[PoliticalTorch]

WOW!! How about that!! This Federal Judge should be sitting on the Supreme Court right now! Let's Hear It For the Judge who was appointed by the elder daddy Bush!! And that's one of their own Republicans socking it to them!

Hobby Lobby Ruling Prompts Federal Judge To Tell Supreme Court To 'STFU'

 

[R.D.]

He's an idiot.

 

[peach174]

He should be fired.

 

[ClosedCaption]

He's an idiot.

Me: Since when?

R.D.: Since I read this

 

[OKTexas]

So some dumb ass says the supremes should have stayed quiet and allowed HHS to violate federal law, sounds to me he should seek a new profession.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"To the average person, the result looks stupid and smells worse," he wrote. "The decision looks misogynist because the majority were all men. It looks partisan because all were appointed by a Republican. The decision looks religiously motivated because each member of the majority belongs to the Catholic church, and that religious organization is opposed to contraception."

Kopf argued that the Supreme Court should have left the case alone, and should stay far away from controversial issues.

"Next term is the time for the Supreme Court to go quiescent–this term and several past terms has proven that the Court is now causing more harm (division) to our democracy than good by deciding hot button cases that the Court has the power to avoid. As the kids says [sic], it is time for the Court to stfu," he wrote."

Well, that's one way to take a stand, and he does have a fair point...

 

[Contumacious]

WOW!! How about that!! This Federal Judge should be sitting on the Supreme Court right now! Let's Hear It For the Judge who was appointed by the elder daddy Bush!! And that's one of their own Republicans socking it to them!

Hobby Lobby Ruling Prompts Federal Judge To Tell Supreme Court To 'STFU'

Former federal judge , Richard Kopf, now a ranch hand, LOL.....


Judge we know that the "judicial" system is corrupt to its core.

But the result of the decision is that one group is not affected by the UNconstitutional Law - so the results are good.

.

 

[peach174]

"To the average person, the result looks stupid and smells worse," he wrote. "The decision looks misogynist because the majority were all men. It looks partisan because all were appointed by a Republican. The decision looks religiously motivated because each member of the majority belongs to the Catholic church, and that religious organization is opposed to contraception."

Kopf argued that the Supreme Court should have left the case alone, and should stay far away from controversial issues.

"Next term is the time for the Supreme Court to go quiescent–this term and several past terms has proven that the Court is now causing more harm (division) to our democracy than good by deciding hot button cases that the Court has the power to avoid. As the kids says [sic], it is time for the Court to stfu," he wrote."

Well, that's one way to take a stand...

It's this administration and Obama who is causing the division.
Sebelius is the one who wrote those 4 drugs into the health care bill, that move in and of itself is illegal.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Sebelius is the one who wrote those 4 drugs into the health care bill, that move in and of itself is illegal.

Prove it? Good luck trying...

 

[HelenaHandbag]

Look at all the progressives, cheering anarchy.

 

[Plasmaball]

He should be fired.

Ah for speaking his opinion. ...goods times

 

[peach174]

He should be fired.

Ah for speaking his opinion. ...goods times

For putting partisanship into it.
A Judge is suppose to be neutral.

 

[Contumacious]

He should be fired.

Too Late.

He has senior status which means that he is retired.

.

 

[kiwiman127]

"To the average person, the result looks stupid and smells worse," he wrote. "The decision looks misogynist because the majority were all men. It looks partisan because all were appointed by a Republican. The decision looks religiously motivated because each member of the majority belongs to the Catholic church, and that religious organization is opposed to contraception."

Kopf argued that the Supreme Court should have left the case alone, and should stay far away from controversial issues.

"Next term is the time for the Supreme Court to go quiescent–this term and several past terms has proven that the Court is now causing more harm (division) to our democracy than good by deciding hot button cases that the Court has the power to avoid. As the kids says [sic], it is time for the Court to stfu," he wrote."

Well, that's one way to take a stand...

It's this administration and Obama who is causing the division.
Sebelius is the one who wrote those 4 drugs into the health care bill, that move in and of itself is illegal.

Right. Any normal person who isn't a loyal partisan, would easily see that the division/polarization has been driven by both parties.
The right has gone even further to the right, the left has gone even further to the left. What this has done is create a huge segment of the population, who are sick to their stomachs of both the right and left.
Now that's the reality of the entire picture.

 

[Contumacious]

He should be fired.

Ah for speaking his opinion. ...goods times

For putting partisanship into it.
A Judge is suppose to be neutral.

Again out "judicial" system is corrupt to the core.

Thurgood Marhsall used to brag that he never read briefs written by "drug" dealers. He would have raised holly hell however if his brethren have admitted that they never read briefs written for Afro-Americans.

And so it goes.

.

.

 

[Machaut]

Kopf argued that the Supreme Court should have left the case alone, and should stay far away from controversial issues.

So a judge's official position is that the Supreme Court should refuse to handle cases that cause controversy.

Yet, there is controversy in this particular matter because a provision of one law (the ACA) was thought to violate another, higher law (the Constitution).

Is it, then, his belief that the Supreme Court should simply ignore cases where their rulings are most needed? Isn't this exactly the kind of case the Supreme Court was meant to handle?

"Next term is the time for the Supreme Court to go quiescent–this term and several past terms has proven that the Court is now causing more harm (division) to our democracy than good by deciding hot button cases that the Court has the power to avoid. As the kids says [sic], it is time for the Court to stfu," he wrote.

So now he's saying that the Supreme Court SHOULD rule on this issue--just not right now, because some people get offended over it--and the time to rule on this will somehow be during the NEXT president's first term, not Obama's. Civil rights violations need to be the next guy in line's problem, and we shouldn't stop them now because some people would get upset.

This was literally the reasoning behind the SC's ruling in the Dred Scott case.

 

[PoliticalTorch]

He should be fired.

You evidently don't know that a Federal Judge is appointed to the bench For Life as is a U.S. Supreme Court Justice.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

WOW!! How about that!! This Federal Judge should be sitting on the Supreme Court right now! Let's Hear It For the Judge who was appointed by the elder daddy Bush!! And that's one of their own Republicans socking it to them!

Hobby Lobby Ruling Prompts Federal Judge To Tell Supreme Court To 'STFU'

It shows that idiocy isn't restricted to Democratic appointees. what a surprise.

 

[kiwiman127]

"To the average person, the result looks stupid and smells worse," he wrote. "The decision looks misogynist because the majority were all men. It looks partisan because all were appointed by a Republican. The decision looks religiously motivated because each member of the majority belongs to the Catholic church, and that religious organization is opposed to contraception."

Kopf argued that the Supreme Court should have left the case alone, and should stay far away from controversial issues.

"Next term is the time for the Supreme Court to go quiescent–this term and several past terms has proven that the Court is now causing more harm (division) to our democracy than good by deciding hot button cases that the Court has the power to avoid. As the kids says [sic], it is time for the Court to stfu," he wrote."

Well, that's one way to take a stand...

It's this administration and Obama who is causing the division.
Sebelius is the one who wrote those 4 drugs into the health care bill, that move in and of itself is illegal.

Right. Any normal person who isn't a loyal partisan, would easily see that the division/polarization has been driven by both parties.
The right has gone even further to the right, the left has gone even further to the left. What this has done is create a huge segment of the population, who are sick to their stomachs of both the right and left.
Now that's the reality of the entire picture.

Here's a little something from Gallup. Notice as both parties have gotten more extreme their favorable rating has steadily gone down, down, down.

 

[Stephanie]

Funny, we wish you would do the same...you do love anyone who is an asshole