FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

the engineer of the towers identified that they had a concrete core to Newsweek on September 13, 2001.

this is a complete lie. Robertson never said any such thing. the newsweek reporter got it wrong.

Since 3,000 died in 20 seconds in what was termed collapse,
this is a lie. you are not being accurate.
the building engineer would absolutely make ONLY accurate information public
he did.
AND if an error was made he would demand a correction. This is only logical, but you do not conduct such in protection of Constitutional rights as an agent for the perpetrators.

he can only demand a correction on what he was quoted as saying. he never said there was a concrete core and was not quoted as saying that.

it is the reporters mistake, not robertsons.

how do you know there was no correction???:cuckoo:

this has nothing to do with constitutional rights. the fact that you keep bringing it up just makes you look crazy.:cuckoo:
 
chris's point, which he eventually might get to, is that embedded in the (nonexistent) concrete core were explosives that were placed 30 years before 9/11.
 
this is a complete lie. Robertson never said any such thing. the newsweek reporter got it wrong.

Since 3,000 died in 20 seconds in what was termed collapse,
this is a lie. you are not being accurate.
he did.
AND if an error was made he would demand a correction. This is only logical, but you do not conduct such in protection of Constitutional rights as an agent for the perpetrators.

he can only demand a correction on what he was quoted as saying. he never said there was a concrete core and was not quoted as saying that.

it is the reporters mistake, not robertsons.

how do you know there was no correction???:cuckoo:

this has nothing to do with constitutional rights. the fact that you keep bringing it up just makes you look crazy.:cuckoo:

If the reporter had made a mistake in the published article consisting of information from Robertson, Robertson would have demanded a correction because the premise of the article is that the details of the structure come from Robertson whether he is quoted or not. These reporters are not like you are.

Since the article information identifies a concrete core and images from 9-11 as well as GZ show concrete, there was a concrete core. However the perpetrators of mass murder would want you to pretend whatever might keep people from understanding the truth, so your behavior fits their intentions of evasion

Due process requires the most accurate determination of the cause of death. If the agency conducting the analysis of what was thought to have been collapse was deceived about the design of the towers, all Americans, and the families, are deprived of Constitutional due process. The perpetrators would want you to belittle the Constitution and try to pretend that due process is has not been grossly violated, but it has.

This is made particularly clear when the core of WTC 2 is seen appearing exactly as a concrete tubular core should on 9-11.

southcorestands.gif
 
Last edited:
so where is the retraction by Time that says it was a steel core?:cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
TV show that Robertson participates in on the collapse of the towers which states it was a STEEL CORE!!

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB6xdCS9NJU[/ame]
 
TV show that Robertson participates in on the collapse of the towers which states it was a STEEL CORE!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB6xdCS9NJU

Yea, it even has CGI animations, :lol: The steel core columns are a lie, the FEMA deception.

http://algoxy.com/conc/fema_deception.html

But Robertson does not state there are steel core columns, because he knows it was a concrete core. He was the building engineer.

Newsweek September 13, 2001

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

And 9-11 images show an empty core with concrete wall to the right and steel box columns outside the core.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg
 
Last edited:
TV show that Robertson participates in on the collapse of the towers which states it was a STEEL CORE!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB6xdCS9NJU

Yea, it even has CGI animations, :lol: The steel core columns are a lie, the FEMA deception.

FEMA misrepresented core structure of the Twin Towers.

But Robertson does not state there are steel core columns, because he knows it was a concrete core. He was the building engineer.

Newsweek September 13, 2001

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

And 9-11 images show an empty core with concrete wall to the right and steel box columns outside the core.
you lie again
none of those words were spoken nor attributed to Mr Robertson
you remain a lying fucktard
 
TV show that Robertson participates in on the collapse of the towers which states it was a STEEL CORE!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB6xdCS9NJU

Yea, it even has CGI animations, :lol: The steel core columns are a lie, the FEMA deception.

FEMA misrepresented core structure of the Twin Towers.

But Robertson does not state there are steel core columns, because he knows it was a concrete core. He was the building engineer.

Newsweek September 13, 2001

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

And 9-11 images show an empty core with concrete wall to the right and steel box columns outside the core.
you lie again
none of those words were spoken nor attributed to Mr Robertson
you remain a lying fucktard

Newsweek is a globally renowned magazine and would certainly get critical structural details BASICALLY correct.

ALSO, you've failed many, many times to state if you think Robertson failed to request a correction or if Newsweek refused to provide it IF the statement is in error.

The article was about Robertson.:lol: So is attributed to him as there are other quotes of him in the article.

Says engineer Robertson, “If they had fallen down immediately, the death counts would have been unimaginable,” he says. “The World Trade Center has performed admirably, and everyone involved in the project should be proud.” The buildings were designed specifically to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, the largest plane flying in 1966, the year they broke ground on the project.
 
Last edited:
Yea, it even has CGI animations, :lol: The steel core columns are a lie, the FEMA deception.

FEMA misrepresented core structure of the Twin Towers.

But Robertson does not state there are steel core columns, because he knows it was a concrete core. He was the building engineer.

Newsweek September 13, 2001

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

And 9-11 images show an empty core with concrete wall to the right and steel box columns outside the core.
you lie again
none of those words were spoken nor attributed to Mr Robertson
you remain a lying fucktard

Newsweek is a globally renowned magazine and would certainly get critical structural details BASICALLY correct.

ALSO, you've failed many, many times to state if you think Robertson failed to request a correction or if Newsweek refused to provide it IF the statement is in error.

The article was about Robertson.:lol: So is attributed to him as there are other quotes of him in the article.

Says engineer Robertson, “If they had fallen down immediately, the death counts would have been unimaginable,” he says. “The World Trade Center has performed admirably, and everyone involved in the project should be proud.” The buildings were designed specifically to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, the largest plane flying in 1966, the year they broke ground on the project.
and he did not state a concrete core
dumbfuck
 
every argument you are making about the newsweek article i can make the same argument about the Time article.

Time would not get the basic structural details wrong either.

but one of them is wrong.

so how many pictures do you have of the concrete core being constructed again? :cuckoo:


and the BBC also says its a steel core. thats two well respected news organizations to your ONE.

you lose.
 
every argument you are making about the newsweek article i can make the same argument about the Time article.

Time would not get the basic structural details wrong either.

but one of them is wrong.

so how many pictures do you have of the concrete core being constructed again? :cuckoo:


and the BBC also says its a steel core. thats two well respected news organizations to your ONE.

you lose.


Bwahahahaaaahaaaaaaaa

You are clueless, .......... agent.

The BBC thought it was a concrete core, but the wrong one.

_1540044_world_trade_structure300.gif


BBC News | AMERICAS | How the World Trade Center fell
 
Last edited:
every argument you are making about the newsweek article i can make the same argument about the Time article.

Time would not get the basic structural details wrong either.

but one of them is wrong.

so how many pictures do you have of the concrete core being constructed again? :cuckoo:


and the BBC also says its a steel core. thats two well respected news organizations to your ONE.

you lose.


Bwahahahaaaahaaaaaaaa

You are clueless, .......... agent.

The BBC thought it was a concrete core, but the wrong one.

_1540044_world_trade_structure300.gif


BBC News | AMERICAS | How the World Trade Center fell
you do know that was only a couple days after the attack and many news orgs got MANY things wrong in their reporting
right?

oh wait, you are still fucking stupid now so of course YOU wouldnt comprehend that
 

Forum List

Back
Top