candycorn
Diamond Member
chris's point, which he eventually might get to, is that embedded in the (nonexistent) concrete core were explosives that were placed 30 years before 9/11.
Wow thats pretty retarded.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
chris's point, which he eventually might get to, is that embedded in the (nonexistent) concrete core were explosives that were placed 30 years before 9/11.
chris's point, which he eventually might get to, is that embedded in the (nonexistent) concrete core were explosives that were placed 30 years before 9/11.
Wow thats pretty retarded.
this moron just doesnt get itthe BBC says there are explosives in the concrete?
i dont think so, moron.
210 pages and he has convinced not a single person that his fake concrete core exists.
what a loser!!!
since the truth is not with you, no one would agree with a dumbfuck like you210 pages and he has convinced not a single person that his fake concrete core exists.
what a loser!!!
It's not likely any American informed by the truth movement of mainstream media would post agreement with agents such as yourselves making the spectacle you are, however, by the number of reads it's clear you are drawing attention and certainly because of the fact you've posted no evidence, a couple of thousand know there was a concrete core and that it is tremendously important to the perpetrators to try to keep secret.
The selectivity exhibited and refusal to observe violations of law by officials enabling the deception exposing the agenda. Clearly, no normal American would be caught dead doing what you are doing, so you are operating on an directive that cannot allow the information of the FEMA deception to become recognized despite being made into complete fools.
we posted no evidence
we posted pictures of the steel core, you jackass!!!
not only do we not see concrete, we dont see any rebar cages or concrete formshey look!!! more pictures of a steel core!!!
you really are a deadbeat moron.
it doesnt matter what i say your little numbers are. you will only claim i am wrong no matter what i say BECAUSE WHAT YOU CLAIM IS A CONCRETE CORE IS IN REALITY A STEEL CORE!!
not only do we not see concrete, we dont see any rebar cages or concrete formshey look!!! more pictures of a steel core!!!
you really are a deadbeat moron.
it doesnt matter what i say your little numbers are. you will only claim i am wrong no matter what i say BECAUSE WHAT YOU CLAIM IS A CONCRETE CORE IS IN REALITY A STEEL CORE!!
your pictures are all photoshopped.
yes it has and all the EXIF info has been stripped off.your pictures are all photoshopped.
No, you will be unable to show that because it has not been done.
yes it has and all the EXIF info has been stripped off.No, you will be unable to show that because it has not been done.
Dunno what that is, but obviously , ......... you know all about it. From my experience photoshopping will show when images are highly zoomed such as gumjobs botched try.
Many have said that about this image,
but experts have examined the hig res original and found no sign. The core of the Twins was concrete just as Newsweeks info from Robertson states on September 13, 2001.
yes it has and all the EXIF info has been stripped off.
Dunno what that is, but obviously , ......... you know all about it. From my experience photoshopping will show when images are highly zoomed such as gumjobs botched try.
Many have said that about this image,
but experts have examined the hig res original and found no sign. The core of the Twins was concrete just as Newsweeks info from Robertson states on September 13, 2001.
this picture is photoshopped too. it doesnt really matter since there is no concrete core there anyway.
NEWSWEEK corrected their error by stating that the world trade center towers had a steel core. High Time - Newsweek.com