FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Christophera]

elevator guide rails can not be exposed to weather because they pit. they go in LAST not first.

Read agent, ........ SUPPORT STEEL for guide rails. In the twins elevators were operating at an average of 5 floors below the top floors. At least one large freight car and one personel car were a condition of the subcontractors performance and the general contractors responsibility to have operating as soon as possible.

The Twins were the first skyscrapers to be build with a significant portion of the building materials, that would fit, transported on their own elevators.

so you are saying these HUGE FUCKING STEEL BEAMS in this picture......

are only to support these little tiny guide rails such as these?

Firstly, you have exposed how little you know of structural steel. Vertical elements are not referred to as "beams".

Those particular columns are OUTSIDE the core on the right. On the left is the concrete core wall. Left of that the empty core.

And here at ground zero on the left, all the guide rail support steel that was supposed to be right of the core base wll remnant is gone. Those massive box columns OUTSIDE the core were by far the stoutest columns in the buildings.

Below, is a concrete elevator shaft with guide rails. Not a service core having multiple elevators and stairs.

 

[Fizz]

dude, you are completely out of your fucking mind.

the picture is of a guy standing in front of a steel core. there is no concrete core in that picture or any other picture.

WHERE'S THE FUCKING CONCRETE!!!

 

[Christophera]

dude, you are completely out of your fucking mind.

the picture is of a guy standing in front of a steel core. there is no concrete core in that picture or any other picture.

WHERE'S THE FUCKING CONCRETE!!!

Uhhhh you forgot a phase,

The concrete has been pulverized, ............ obviously, ............. agent.

FEMA misrepresented the core structure to NIST. The cause of death is invalid.

 

[Fizz]

The concrete has been pulverized, ............ obviously, ............. agent.

FEMA misrepresented the core structure to NIST. The cause of death is invalid.

wow, you are really a jackass.

if there was a concrete core and it was surrounded by steel columns, as you claim, then how is it possible that ALL the concrete inside the steel was pulverized without bending the steel?

we both know what the real answer is. there was no concrete in there. you can see from the above picture that there was no concrete in there. how the hell could the concrete have been pulverized but the gypsum still be found attached? your claims are ridiculous.

we already went over the "cause of death" thing. the cause of death is homicide. steel core or concrete core doesnt matter as to the cause of death. it is still murder. this claim of yours is also ridiculous.

 

[Christophera]

The concrete has been pulverized, ............ obviously, ............. agent.

FEMA misrepresented the core structure to NIST. The cause of death is invalid.

wow, you are really a jackass.

if there was a concrete core and it was surrounded by steel columns, as you claim, then how is it possible that ALL the concrete inside the steel was pulverized without bending the steel?

Concrete can be instantly fractured to fall freely by a small amount of properly placed high explosives.

Some of the steel was bent. Look at the billowed web of the "I" beam?

 

[Fizz]

so you are claiming that high explosives blew apart all the concrete from the core in this picture but not only left the steel virtually undisturbed but it also left the attached gypsum unaffected?

 

[Christophera]

Hey Toro, which conspiracy theory is worse? 9/11 or the "Holohoax"?

The demise and usurpation of the US Constitution is the worst. Do you agree?

the demise of the US Constitution is not a conspiracy as defined by the current connotation of the term "conspiracy theory".

This determination depends on what information one uses in the definition of conspiracy.

There are also conspiracy facts when laws are violated to enable provision of due process.

Cognitive distortions are not adequate for use in the is arena of analysis, minimizations, generalizations, etc.

 

[Christophera]

so you are claiming that high explosives blew apart all the concrete from the core in this picture but not only left the steel virtually undisturbed but it also left the attached gypsum unaffected?

The agent that calls vertical steel "beams" also has no idea of what it takes to damage heavy tempered steel with high explosives. This is logical.

The difference in thickness between the web of this "I" beam and the interior box column on the right and guide rail steel on the left is very large.

 

[Fizz]

The agent that calls vertical steel "beams" also has no idea of what it takes to damage heavy tempered steel with high explosives. This is logical.

The difference in thickness between the web of this "I" beam and the interior box column on the right and guide rail steel on the left is very large.

hey deadbeat.. get a job and pay the child support you owe.....

then explain how high explosives removed the concrete from this picture of the core while leaving the gypsum in place.

 

[Fizz]

here is a better picture of your "concrete core" that you keep showing from across the hudson. it is clearly steel

 

[Christophera]

here is a better picture of your "concrete core" that you keep showing from across the hudson. it is clearly steel

The above and below photos show the interior box columns. Below the concrete has detonated and the frames are falling, the core is empty. Above the concrete is still inside the inner framed wall and the detonations that removed it to expose it in the core image I use have not yet happened.

Here is the concrete wall

 

[Fizz]

you are delusional.

concrete doesnt detonate. neither does steel.

 

[Christophera]

you are delusional.

concrete doesnt detonate. neither does steel.

All the floors are gone, why is the concrete turning to dust and particulate inside the steel framework? The force of blasts are just visible in the horizontal bursts of dust/sand/gravel. White colored projectiles are travel horizontally of over 100 feet away on the right side.

 

[Fizz]

you are delusional.

concrete doesnt detonate. neither does steel.

All the floors are gone, why is the concrete turning to dust and particulate inside the steel framework? The force of blasts are just visible in the horizontal bursts of dust/sand/gravel. White colored projectiles are travel horizontally of over 100 feet away on the right side.

thats an easy one. because the "concrete" is really gypsum.

 

[Christophera]

you are delusional.

concrete doesnt detonate. neither does steel.

All the floors are gone, why is the concrete turning to dust and particulate inside the steel framework? The force of blasts are just visible in the horizontal bursts of dust/sand/gravel. White colored projectiles are travel horizontally of over 100 feet away on the right side.

thats an easy one. because the "concrete" is really gypsum.

Are you saying that gypsum stands uniformly solid leaving a smooth rounded top after hundreds of thousands of tons of heavy steel structure crashed over?

 

[Fizz]

Are you saying that gypsum stands uniformly solid leaving a smooth rounded top after hundreds of thousands of tons of heavy steel structure crashed over?

no. and thats why it is turning to dust as you stated earlier.

your image is from the west. the sun was shining from the east. therfore you are looking through the smoke towards the sun. of course you are not going to see any detail looking at the unilluminated part!!

here is what the other side looks like, jackass.

 

[Fizz]

look. no concrete. only gypsum.

 

[Fizz]

steel core.

steel core thrown all over the place...

steel core.

no concrete core.

steel core.

steel core.

steel core.

steel core.

steel core.

steel core.

steel core.

steel core.

 

[Fizz]

New York Times says steel core. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/23/n...uildings-offered-as-model.html?pagewanted=all
Newsweek. steel core. High Time - Newsweek.com
Time Magazine. steel core. Twin Terrors - The Discovery Channel - TIME.com
engineering.com steel core. ENGINEERING.com > World Trade Center Disaster
skyscraper.org steel core. The World Trade Center: Statistics and History
University of Sydney steel core. World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects - Civil Engineering - The University of Sydney
Berkeley steel core. 04.17.2002 - World Trade Center remembered

 

[Christophera]

Are you saying that gypsum stands uniformly solid leaving a smooth rounded top after hundreds of thousands of tons of heavy steel structure crashed over?

no. and thats why it is turning to dust as you stated earlier.

your image is from the west. the sun was shining from the east. therfore you are looking through the smoke towards the sun. of course you are not going to see any detail looking at the unilluminated part!!

here is what the other side looks like, jackass.

That is seconds before from the south. The particualate has fallen in this later image.

In silhouette we would see the major structural steel you claim existed was in the core, protruding out the top. WE can see the uniform round shape of the top. Gypsum will not do that after hundrds of thousands of tons of steel has crashed over it.

That steel inside and outside the core would make holes in the gypsum and rip long vertical slashes of gypsum away.

Here we see what can only be rebar.

The core to the right of it is empty. Where are the supposed steel core columns with their many interconnecting diagonal braces? If we do not see them under these conditions, they clearly did not exist. Just as the lead engineer identified a concrete core not steel core columns on
September 13, 2001.