FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Fizz]

sorry but "could" isnt good enough. your proof is what?

I can show you a website with all the independently verified evidence proving the concrete core.

In order to reasonably continue you must link to a website having images of the steel core columns in the core area. Surely if the steel core columns existed in the core area as you say they did, many pictures will be available to post here.

since when is YOUR website INDENPENDENT?!!!

you are a jackass!!

steel core.

steel core.

steel core during cleanup efforts. notice the steel core is relatively intact at this point of the building and there is no concrete core.

no concrete core.

and then these pictures of the core under construction. no concrete. notice in the first one the floor above is already in place.

TV show that Robertson participates in on the collapse of the towers which states it was a STEEL CORE!!

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB6xdCS9NJU[/ame]

another video documentary with robertson that says it was a STEEL CORE.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqDTEZIdg7g&feature=PlayList&p=A6382FD1025BACE9&index=62[/ame]

New York Times says steel core. Comparing 2 Sets Of Twin Towers; Malaysian Buildings Offered as Model - NYTimes.com
Newsweek. steel core. High Time - Newsweek.com
Time Magazine. steel core. Twin Terrors - The Discovery Channel - TIME.com
engineering.com steel core. ENGINEERING.com > World Trade Center Disaster
skyscraper.org steel core. The World Trade Center: Statistics and History
University of Sydney steel core. World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects - Civil Engineering - The University of Sydney
Berkeley steel core. 04.17.2002 - World Trade Center remembered
and one of my favorites....
Time Magazine article from 1964!! Art: Onward & Upward - TIME

 

[Christophera]

sorry but "could" isnt good enough. your proof is what?

I can show you a website with all the independently verified evidence proving the concrete core.

In order to reasonably continue you must link to a website having images of the steel core columns in the core area. Surely if the steel core columns existed in the core area as you say they did, many pictures will be available to post here.

since when is YOUR website INDENPENDENT?!!!

SPAM

Dude, you are so over owned with that spam. All misrepresentations. You need to post images of steel core columns in the core area to make those claims. They are all in the trash and have been since before you began with them.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html

 

[DiveCon]

I can show you a website with all the independently verified evidence proving the concrete core.

In order to reasonably continue you must link to a website having images of the steel core columns in the core area. Surely if the steel core columns existed in the core area as you say they did, many pictures will be available to post here.

since when is YOUR website INDENPENDENT?!!!

SPAM

Dude, you are so over owned with that spam. All misrepresentations. You need to post images of steel core columns in the core area to make those claims. They are all in the trash and have been since before you began with them.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html

only because dumbfucks such as yourself are scared of truth and facts
you prefer your delusions to the truth

 

[Christophera]

since when is YOUR website INDENPENDENT?!!!

SPAM

Dude, you are so over owned with that spam. All misrepresentations. You need to post images of steel core columns in the core area to make those claims. They are all in the trash and have been since before you began with them.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html

only because dumbfucks such as yourself are scared of truth and facts
you prefer your delusions to the truth

No, because the web site,

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

is filled with independantly verified evidence corobborating and consistent with each other.

Can you link to one that has that type sourcing, not from FEMA?

 

[Fizz]

Dude, you are so over owned with that spam. All misrepresentations. You need to post images of steel core columns in the core area to make those claims. They are all in the trash and have been since before you began with them.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html

only because dumbfucks such as yourself are scared of truth and facts
you prefer your delusions to the truth

No, because the web site,

The Concrete Core Of The WTC Towers

is filled with independantly verified evidence corobborating and consistent with each other.

Can you link to one that has that type sourcing, not from FEMA?

you are an idiot. what evidence was independently verified? you mean things like the lie that robertson said it was a concrete core when in fact he never said it? it was the reporter saying it. then newsweek does another story later that identifies it as a steel core.

you mean that independently verified info?

you are shit. your website is shit. you have no proof of any concrete core and everything you say has already been debunked to the point that you change your story repeatedly in order to continue your hoax to sell books.

 

[Christophera]

only because dumbfucks such as yourself are scared of truth and facts
you prefer your delusions to the truth

No, because the web site,

The Concrete Core Of The WTC Towers

is filled with independantly verified evidence corobborating and consistent with each other.

Can you link to one that has that type sourcing, not from FEMA?

you are an idiot. what evidence was independently verified? you mean things like the lie that robertson said it was a concrete core when in fact he never said it?

Of course you cannot prove he did not say there was a concrete core AND since 3,000 were killed in what was supposed to be a collapse both Newsweek AND Robertson would be very sure the information was accurate AND the information is independently verified by another structural engineer who happens to be certified in 12 states which is verified independently again by photos of the concrete core on 9-11.

 

[Fizz]

you are an idiot. what evidence was independently verified? you mean things like the lie that robertson said it was a concrete core when in fact he never said it?

Of course you cannot prove he did not say there was a concrete core AND since 3,000 were killed in what was supposed to be a collapse both Newsweek AND Robertson would be very sure the information was accurate AND the information is independently verified by another structural engineer who happens to be certified in 12 states which is verified independently again by photos of the concrete core on 9-11.

you are a complete babbling idiot. i dont need to prove robertson DIDNT say it. he isnt quoted. you need to prove HE DID SAY IT and you have not. if he did say it then logically he would have been quoted as in other parts of the article. robertson would not be "very sure the information was accurate". its not his job. its the reporter's job. i would imagine that in the days following 9/11 he was a little bit busy.

what is amazing is that your false claim of robertson saying something is actually the best evidence you have. other than that you have NOTHING.

 

[Christophera]

you are an idiot. what evidence was independently verified? you mean things like the lie that robertson said it was a concrete core when in fact he never said it?

Of course you cannot prove he did not say there was a concrete core AND since 3,000 were killed in what was supposed to be a collapse both Newsweek AND Robertson would be very sure the information was accurate AND the information is independently verified by another structural engineer who happens to be certified in 12 states which is verified independently again by photos of the concrete core on 9-11.

you are a complete babbling idiot. i dont need to prove robertson DIDNT say it. he isnt quoted.

Lacking quotes onnly means it is not written exactly as he said it, not that it is incorrect. The report of August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE ground zero safety report. (He saw FEMA plans 2 weeks after 9-11 at ground zero) independently verifies Robertsons info to Newsweek.

The image of the WTC 2 concrete core independently verifies Robertson and Domel. The Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992. independently confirms the Newsweek article as correct.

 

[Fizz]

Lacking quotes onnly means it is not written exactly as he said it, not that it is incorrect. The report of August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE ground zero safety report. (He saw FEMA plans 2 weeks after 9-11 at ground zero) independently verifies Robertsons info to Newsweek.

The image of the WTC 2 concrete core independently verifies Robertson and Domel. The Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992. independently confirms the Newsweek article as correct.

lacking quotes means that YOU CANT PROVE HE SAID IT. i have written him and he has stated to me the core was steel. i'm sure you did that too and he told you the same thing.

even if you did want to use the standard that robertson participated in the interview there for he must have stated what the core was made from you can have a look at these for proof.

TV show that Robertson participates in on the collapse of the towers which states it was a STEEL CORE!!

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB6xdCS9NJU[/ame]

another video documentary with robertson that says it was a STEEL CORE.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqDTEZIdg7g&feature=PlayList&p=A6382FD1025BACE9&index=62[/ame]

New York Times says steel core. Comparing 2 Sets Of Twin Towers; Malaysian Buildings Offered as Model - NYTimes.com
Newsweek. steel core. High Time - Newsweek.com
Time Magazine. steel core. Twin Terrors - The Discovery Channel - TIME.com
engineering.com steel core. ENGINEERING.com > World Trade Center Disaster
skyscraper.org steel core. The World Trade Center: Statistics and History
University of Sydney steel core. World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects - Civil Engineering - The University of Sydney
Berkeley steel core. 04.17.2002 - World Trade Center remembered
and one of my favorites....
Time Magazine article from 1964!! Art: Onward & Upward - TIME

 

[Christophera]

you are an idiot. what evidence was independently verified? you mean things like the lie that robertson said it was a concrete core when in fact he never said it?

Of course you cannot prove he did not say there was a concrete core AND since 3,000 were killed in what was supposed to be a collapse both Newsweek AND Robertson would be very sure the information was accurate AND the information is independently verified by another structural engineer who happens to be certified in 12 states which is verified independently again by photos of the concrete core on 9-11.

you are a complete babbling idiot. i dont need to prove robertson DIDNT say it. he isnt quoted.

Since it is in Newsweek and it is verified by another engineer it does not need to be quoted for it to be fact. Since it is further verified by images from 9-11 showing concrete walls, both engineers statements have gained corroboration. When the Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation that was published in 1992 shows a concrete core, you lose.

Your support for secret methods of mass murder is obvious.

 

[Christophera]

Lacking quotes onnly means it is not written exactly as he said it, not that it is incorrect. The report of August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE ground zero safety report. (He saw FEMA plans 2 weeks after 9-11 at ground zero) independently verifies Robertsons info to Newsweek.

The image of the WTC 2 concrete core independently verifies Robertson and Domel. The Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992. independently confirms the Newsweek article as correct.

lacking quotes means that YOU CANT PROVE HE SAID IT.

text, text, text,

You are a liar and gumjob is a liar and a photoshopper. The Video displaying Robertson face IS not associated with any statement of structural detail. You misrepresent. All SPAM agent.

You are so owned in your crappy spam act. Reposting images that are not even the WTC.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html

 

[Fizz]

Lacking quotes onnly means it is not written exactly as he said it, not that it is incorrect. The report of August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE ground zero safety report. (He saw FEMA plans 2 weeks after 9-11 at ground zero) independently verifies Robertsons info to Newsweek.

The image of the WTC 2 concrete core independently verifies Robertson and Domel. The Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992. independently confirms the Newsweek article as correct.

lacking quotes means that YOU CANT PROVE HE SAID IT.

text, text, text,

You are a liar and gumjob is a liar and a photoshopper. The Video displaying Robertson face IS not associated with any statement of structural detail. You misrepresent. All SPAM agent.

You are so owned in your crappy spam act. Reposting images that are not even the WTC.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html

liar? you want to call ME a liar?

you stupid fucking moron!!!

YOU are the one that skipped out on your child support for like 15 years.
YOU are the one that went to a business and claimed a rock from a truck broke your fuse and they owe you $65 and needed to be dragged out of the place by police.
YOU are the liar that claims robertson said something he didnt say.
YOU are the one lying and claiming secret agents scoured the internet and stole all pictures of a concrete core.
YOU are the one that filed a lawsuit saying someone tried to harm you by blinking in your general directions.
YOU are the person that owes $30,000 in back child support.
YOU are the person lying and saying there is a concrete core with absolutely no proof just so you can sell a book to try to make money off your hoax.
YOU are the person that accuses everyone that tells the truth and says it is a steel core of being a secret government agent.
YOU are the guy that cant show one single picture of a concrete core being built.
YOU are the guy that keeps changing his story every time you are caught with one of your lies.

 

[Fizz]

oh wait....

there's more....

YOU are the liar that was sentenced to jail time.
YOU are the liar that claims he cant afford to go to the doctor but you can afford to PAY to get a book published.
YOU are the liar that claims he needs a paper from 1876 in order to get medical treatment.
YOU are the liar that claims something was photoshopped because there are digital lines in it and YOUR PHOTOS HAVE THE SAME THINGS!!


need i go on?

now who's the fucking liar you piece of shit deadbeat?!!

 

[Fizz]

oh... and i forgot a BIG one.....


YOU ARE THE GUY THAT FILED FOR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIMING HE COULDNT WORK WHILE STILL WORKING UNDER THE TABLE!!!!

 

[Christophera]

lacking quotes means that YOU CANT PROVE HE SAID IT.

text, text, text,

You are a liar and gumjob is a liar and a photoshopper. The Video displaying Robertson face IS not associated with any statement of structural detail. You misrepresent. All SPAM agent.

You are so owned in your crappy spam act. Reposting images that are not even the WTC.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html

liar? you want to call ME a liar?

You misrepresent everything so your counter accusations are empty. You fail to recognize violations of law, so could not render any reasonable evaluation of me, or 9-11.

You are a traitor and have no sense of principled responsibility to the Consitution. Here, how do you feel about the violations of law enabling the FEMA deceptions.

guiliani took the towers plans while the courts protect their hiding

 

[Fizz]

text, text, text,

You are a liar and gumjob is a liar and a photoshopper. The Video displaying Robertson face IS not associated with any statement of structural detail. You misrepresent. All SPAM agent.

You are so owned in your crappy spam act. Reposting images that are not even the WTC.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html

liar? you want to call ME a liar?

You misrepresent everything so your counter accusations are empty. You fail to recognize violations of law, so could not render any reasonable evaluation of me, or 9-11.

You are a traitor and have no sense of principled responsibility to the Consitution. Here, how do you feel about the violations of law enabling the FEMA deceptions.

guiliani took the towers plans while the courts protect their hiding

how much of a fucking moron can you be?

you MISREPRESENT the steel core as a concrete core with no facts to back it up in order to make money off a book.

the guiliani thing is simply another hoax by you. guiliani didnt have the plans for the towers. prove he did then maybe we can talk.

 

[Christophera]

liar? you want to call ME a liar?

You misrepresent everything so your counter accusations are empty. You fail to recognize violations of law, so could not render any reasonable evaluation of me, or 9-11.

You are a traitor and have no sense of principled responsibility to the Consitution. Here, how do you feel about the violations of law enabling the FEMA deceptions.

guiliani took the towers plans while the courts protect their hiding

you MISREPRESENT the steel core as a concrete core with no facts to back it up

Oops, you missed lots of hard evidence. Here is some. The west concrete core wall of WTC 1 left of the spire.

 

[Fizz]

You misrepresent everything so your counter accusations are empty. You fail to recognize violations of law, so could not render any reasonable evaluation of me, or 9-11.

You are a traitor and have no sense of principled responsibility to the Consitution. Here, how do you feel about the violations of law enabling the FEMA deceptions.

guiliani took the towers plans while the courts protect their hiding

you MISREPRESENT the steel core as a concrete core with no facts to back it up

Oops, you missed lots of hard evidence. Here is some. The west concrete core wall of WTC 1 left of the spire.

no concrete in the picture.

next.....

 

[Christophera]

you MISREPRESENT the steel core as a concrete core with no facts to back it up

Oops, you missed lots of hard evidence. Here is some. The west concrete core wall of WTC 1 left of the spire.

no concrete in the picture.

next.....

Wow, exactly what serves the perpetrators interests, EXACTLY. And, no alternative is suggested. No notice that core area on the left is empty. Concrete can be fractured to fall instantly by a small amount of properly placed explosives, and that is what the perps do not want people to realize. So naturally agents have to diss concrete bigtime.

The perps would want you to reject that and make a number of disgusting statements right now and act very entitled.

12. Entitlement: Believing that you deserve things you have not earned.

 

[Fizz]

Oops, you missed lots of hard evidence. Here is some. The west concrete core wall of WTC 1 left of the spire.

no concrete in the picture.

next.....

Wow, exactly what serves the perpetrators interests, EXACTLY. And, no alternative is suggested. No notice that core area on the left is empty. Concrete can be fractured to fall instantly by a small amount of properly placed explosives, and that is what the perps do not want people to realize. So naturally agents have to diss concrete bigtime.

The perps would want you to reject that and make a number of disgusting statements right now and act very entitled.

12. Entitlement: Believing that you deserve things you have not earned.

the "perpetrators" are the 19 muslim hijackers, you dumbass.

concrete can be fractured..... blah blah blah.... but you still havent shown us that there was a concrete core!!

now you're so fucking ridiculous that you are showing us an emtpy core area and claiming concrete was there!! HAHAHAHahahahah!!! you GOT NOTHING!!