FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

Chris.

What were the dimensions of the box columns at the lobby level? How wide and how long?

Care to guess?

Gumjob,

Why don't you have images of the supposed steel core columns from 9-11?

It was 80 x 120 feet inside and 1,368 feet tall. Where did all the steel columns and diagonal braces go?

Show any of the needed high strength joints to the columns of the diagonals from the columns if they existed

Don't need to. I've proven your concrete core couldn't have physically existed and there's nothing you can do about it. My evidence and proof shows that all the claims you have made are nothing more than bullshit. That's why you won't debate me.

Coward.

:lol::lol::lol:
 
It was 80 x 120 feet inside

Uh oh Chris!!! Now you have REAL problems!!!!

If the end to end dimensions of the 8 core box columns was 130', center to center, and your interior core wall dimension is 120', that leaves us 10'!!!!!

10' divided by two walls equals 5' thick.

Are you now saying that the walls were not 12' thick, but 5' thick????

:lol::lol::lol:
 
hey chris. tell us again how these are "elevator guide rail supports"!!!:cuckoo:

where are the elevator guide rails?....

WHERE ARE THE FUCKING ELEVATORS?:lol:!!!

WTC_1993_ATF.jpg
 
hey chris. tell us again how these are "elevator guide rail supports"!!!:cuckoo:

where are the elevator guide rails?....

WHERE ARE THE FUCKING ELEVATORS?:lol:!!!

WTC_1993_ATF.jpg
 
Where are copies of the blueprints used for the Towers? I had read the government would not release them to the public for sever years after 9E. If true, why would they not release them and if they have been released, where are they?
 
Where are copies of the blueprints used for the Towers? I had read the government would not release them to the public for sever years after 9E. If true, why would they not release them and if they have been released, where are they?

Why do you play these games Curve? If you don't know how to you expect us to know? Are you asking these questions to then turn around and imply that there is some sort of plot going on?

Why don't you get off your lazy ass and ask questions from people who would know instead of asking in an internet forum.

Why don't you ask Robertson? Maybe he can shed some light on the subject for you.

For what it's worth, the leaked drawings, the ones Chris says are fake, match up to any and all photos of the interior, exterior, construction, and debris. How can the leaked blueprints be fake if they match everything?
 
Where are copies of the blueprints used for the Towers? I had read the government would not release them to the public for sever years after 9E. If true, why would they not release them and if they have been released, where are they?

Why do you play these games Curve? If you don't know how to you expect us to know? Are you asking these questions to then turn around and imply that there is some sort of plot going on?

Why don't you get off your lazy ass and ask questions from people who would know instead of asking in an internet forum.

Why don't you ask Robertson? Maybe he can shed some light on the subject for you.

For what it's worth, the leaked drawings, the ones Chris says are fake, match up to any and all photos of the interior, exterior, construction, and debris. How can the leaked blueprints be fake if they match everything?


Thank you for help proving your camp is scared to death of addressing the facts. It's really quite sick when you think about it. Apparently, there are no official copies of the blueprints that have been made public but instead of addressing that fact you choose to play some Miss Cleo mind reading games. Iow, you care more about your own fantasies about some anonymous person on the internet versus the fact the government is withholding key evidence on the worst terrorist attack in recent US history. Hell, you aren't even brave enough to even begin explaining why the blueprints have not been released.
 
Where are copies of the blueprints used for the Towers? I had read the government would not release them to the public for sever years after 9E. If true, why would they not release them and if they have been released, where are they?

Why do you play these games Curve? If you don't know how to you expect us to know? Are you asking these questions to then turn around and imply that there is some sort of plot going on?

Why don't you get off your lazy ass and ask questions from people who would know instead of asking in an internet forum.

Why don't you ask Robertson? Maybe he can shed some light on the subject for you.

For what it's worth, the leaked drawings, the ones Chris says are fake, match up to any and all photos of the interior, exterior, construction, and debris. How can the leaked blueprints be fake if they match everything?


Thank you for help proving your camp is scared to death of addressing the facts. It's really quite sick when you think about it. Apparently, there are no official copies of the blueprints that have been made public but instead of addressing that fact you choose to play some Miss Cleo mind reading games. Iow, you care more about your own fantasies about some anonymous person on the internet versus the fact the government is withholding key evidence on the worst terrorist attack in recent US history. Hell, you aren't even brave enough to even begin explaining why the blueprints have not been released.

Have you asked anyone relevant to the blueprints or are you just going to ask people here to speculate? Get off your lazy ass and ask someone in the know. Then you won't have to ask people in an internet forum to speculate.

Ask Robertson if they are available? What the hell are you waiting for? Have you made a request for a copy of them? What did they say?
 
Where are copies of the blueprints used for the Towers? I had read the government would not release them to the public for sever years after 9E. If true, why would they not release them and if they have been released, where are they?

Why do you play these games Curve? If you don't know how to you expect us to know? Are you asking these questions to then turn around and imply that there is some sort of plot going on?

Why don't you get off your lazy ass and ask questions from people who would know instead of asking in an internet forum.

Why don't you ask Robertson? Maybe he can shed some light on the subject for you.

For what it's worth, the leaked drawings, the ones Chris says are fake, match up to any and all photos of the interior, exterior, construction, and debris. How can the leaked blueprints be fake if they match everything?


Thank you for help proving your camp is scared to death of addressing the facts. It's really quite sick when you think about it. Apparently, there are no official copies of the blueprints that have been made public but instead of addressing that fact you choose to play some Miss Cleo mind reading games. Iow, you care more about your own fantasies about some anonymous person on the internet versus the fact the government is withholding key evidence on the worst terrorist attack in recent US history. Hell, you aren't even brave enough to even begin explaining why the blueprints have not been released.

Read and learn dipshit.

Tracy Jong Law Firm - Copyright of Engineering Drawings, Plans and Designs

Blueprints are protected by copyright laws and are owned by the author. They are NOT public domain until the author of said blueprints gives permission.

So take up your beef with Leslie Robertson and his firm. As it stands now, he, or one of his associates, would be able to set you straight and answer your questions about why the prints have not been released.

Get moving. We are all on pins and needles waiting to hear what you find out.
 
Why do you play these games Curve? If you don't know how to you expect us to know? Are you asking these questions to then turn around and imply that there is some sort of plot going on?

Why don't you get off your lazy ass and ask questions from people who would know instead of asking in an internet forum.

Why don't you ask Robertson? Maybe he can shed some light on the subject for you.

For what it's worth, the leaked drawings, the ones Chris says are fake, match up to any and all photos of the interior, exterior, construction, and debris. How can the leaked blueprints be fake if they match everything?


Thank you for help proving your camp is scared to death of addressing the facts. It's really quite sick when you think about it. Apparently, there are no official copies of the blueprints that have been made public but instead of addressing that fact you choose to play some Miss Cleo mind reading games. Iow, you care more about your own fantasies about some anonymous person on the internet versus the fact the government is withholding key evidence on the worst terrorist attack in recent US history. Hell, you aren't even brave enough to even begin explaining why the blueprints have not been released.

Read and learn dipshit.

Tracy Jong Law Firm - Copyright of Engineering Drawings, Plans and Designs

Blueprints are protected by copyright laws and are owned by the author. They are NOT public domain until the author of said blueprints gives permission.

So take up your beef with Leslie Robertson and his firm. As it stands now, he, or one of his associates, would be able to set you straight and answer your questions about why the prints have not been released.

Get moving. We are all on pins and needles waiting to hear what you find out.

The Towers have aways been owned by the government you dumbfuck. What other silly attempts do you have to try and justify the government withholding key evidence in a major crime?
 
Thank you for help proving your camp is scared to death of addressing the facts. It's really quite sick when you think about it. Apparently, there are no official copies of the blueprints that have been made public but instead of addressing that fact you choose to play some Miss Cleo mind reading games. Iow, you care more about your own fantasies about some anonymous person on the internet versus the fact the government is withholding key evidence on the worst terrorist attack in recent US history. Hell, you aren't even brave enough to even begin explaining why the blueprints have not been released.

Read and learn dipshit.

Tracy Jong Law Firm - Copyright of Engineering Drawings, Plans and Designs

Blueprints are protected by copyright laws and are owned by the author. They are NOT public domain until the author of said blueprints gives permission.

So take up your beef with Leslie Robertson and his firm. As it stands now, he, or one of his associates, would be able to set you straight and answer your questions about why the prints have not been released.

Get moving. We are all on pins and needles waiting to hear what you find out.

The Towers have aways been owned by the government you dumbfuck. What other silly attempts do you have to try and justify the government withholding key evidence in a major crime?

The towers THEMSELVES may have been owned by the government, but the blueprints are owned by the author unless the author deems otherwise.

You DO know the difference between the actual towers and their blueprints right?
 
Read and learn dipshit.

Tracy Jong Law Firm - Copyright of Engineering Drawings, Plans and Designs

Blueprints are protected by copyright laws and are owned by the author. They are NOT public domain until the author of said blueprints gives permission.

So take up your beef with Leslie Robertson and his firm. As it stands now, he, or one of his associates, would be able to set you straight and answer your questions about why the prints have not been released.

Get moving. We are all on pins and needles waiting to hear what you find out.

The Towers have aways been owned by the government you dumbfuck. What other silly attempts do you have to try and justify the government withholding key evidence in a major crime?

The towers THEMSELVES may have been owned by the government, but the blueprints are owned by the author unless the author deems otherwise.

You DO know the difference between the actual towers and their blueprints right?


What blueprints did NIST, FEMA, etc use in their Building Performance Reports?
 
The Towers have aways been owned by the government you dumbfuck. What other silly attempts do you have to try and justify the government withholding key evidence in a major crime?

The towers THEMSELVES may have been owned by the government, but the blueprints are owned by the author unless the author deems otherwise.

You DO know the difference between the actual towers and their blueprints right?


What blueprints did NIST, FEMA, etc use in their Building Performance Reports?

The one's from Robertson's firm? Was that a trick question or something? Have you looked at the WTC section of LERA's website to see how they cooperated? Does Domel's report say they had blueprints/drawings?

Have you actually looked into this at all?
 
The towers THEMSELVES may have been owned by the government, but the blueprints are owned by the author unless the author deems otherwise.

You DO know the difference between the actual towers and their blueprints right?


What blueprints did NIST, FEMA, etc use in their Building Performance Reports?

The one's from Robertson's firm? Was that a trick question or something? Have you looked at the WTC section of LERA's website to see how they cooperated? Does Domel's report say they had blueprints/drawings?

Have you actually looked into this at all?


What blueprints did NIST, FEMA, etc use in their Building Performance Reports?
 
What blueprints did NIST, FEMA, etc use in their Building Performance Reports?

The one's from Robertson's firm? Was that a trick question or something? Have you looked at the WTC section of LERA's website to see how they cooperated? Does Domel's report say they had blueprints/drawings?

Have you actually looked into this at all?


What blueprints did NIST, FEMA, etc use in their Building Performance Reports?

From LERA's website:
LERA's website said:
World Trade Center and NIST

"In response to the WTC tragedy, the National Institute of Standards and Technology is conducting a three-part plan: a 24-month building and fire safety investigation to study the factors contributing to the probable cause (or causes) of post-impact collapse of the WTC Towers (WTC 1 and 2) and WTC 7; a research and development program to provide the technical basis for improved building and fire codes, standards, and practices; and a dissemination and technical assistance program to engage leaders of the construction and building community in implementing proposed changes to practices, standards and codes. Also it will provide practical guidance and tools to better prepare facility owners, contractors, architects, engineers, emergency responders, and regulatory authorities to respond to future disasters."

LERA participated in the development of a database of structural information for the two towers of the World Trade Center (WTC1 and 2).

See that last part about LERA participated in the development of structural information? How the fuck do you think they did that? From memory?
 

Forum List

Back
Top