FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Christophera]

The concrete core base wall of WTC 1.

What silversteins obsolete altered plans show for the 3rd floor core plan.

Altered by the digital addition of revision tables to the scanned blueprints.

The pixel wide spaces and lines are not possible with scanned pencil drawing of the original scale.

 

[DiveCon]

The concrete core base wall of WTC 1.



What silversteins obsolete altered plans show for the 3rd floor core plan.



Altered by the digital addition of revision tables to the scanned blueprints.



The pixel wide spaces and lines are not possible with scanned pencil drawing of the original scale.

you fail once again, dipshit

 

[Fizz]

all that shit has been debunked already. your hoax is complete bullshit.

hey chris...

WHERE IS YOUR CONCRETE CORE?!!!

 

[Christophera]

The fact is that the scanned blueprints from silverstein DO NOT MATCH what is seen at ground zero and the

The plans show an air shaft, a steam shaft or an elevator in that position.

 

[DiveCon]

The fact is that the scanned blueprints from silverstein DO NOT MATCH what is seen at ground zero and the



The plans show an air shaft, a steam shaft or an elevator in that position.

the plans show what was found
your assessment of what was found in that photo is deficient

you are a complete and total fucktard

 

[Christophera]

The photo of the core wall at its base shows NO CORE COLUMNS. To the right and in the foreground there are NO CORE COLUMNS.

The 3rd floor core plan does show a janitor closet, steam shaft and airshaft but we see a gray mass with daylight shining through a hallway.

Clearly, you pretend to be deficient.

 

[Liability]

The photo of the core wall at its base shows NO CORE COLUMNS. To the right and in the foreground there are NO CORE COLUMNS.

The 3rd floor core plan does show a janitor closet, steam shaft and airshaft but we see a gray mass with daylight shining through a hallway.

Clearly, you pretend to be deficient.

LOL! What a stumbling fumbling bumblefuck.

You don't pretend to be deficient, you lying fuck. You truly ARE deficient. It's the sole true thing about you.

 

[Fizz]

hey chris...

why can't you answer this question?

WHERE IS YOUR CONCRETE CORE?!!!

your claim has been proven to be a hoax.

 

[Christophera]

The concrete core.

Not gypsum fastened to steel columns.

 

[slackjawed]

Two pictures;

one is a picture of what the hell is wrong with you agent chrissy

the other is the inside of the core from wt2 clearly showing gypsum planking covering the inside


epic fail for the agent, years worth of fail
your mission of 9 years is a fail, but I bet your used to failure........

 

[DiveCon]

The concrete core.



Not gypsum fastened to steel columns.

if you werent so fucking stupid you would understand that the light being blocked could have been blocked by ANYTHING including but not limited to gypsum wall planks

but you have yet to show any conclusive proof of concrete in the core above grade

 

[Christophera]

if you werent so fucking stupid you would understand that the light being blocked could not have been blocked off by gypsum wall planks that WOULD BE DESTROYED before the photo was taken.

but you have yet to show any independent verifications of steel core columns or any image of them on 9-11.

 

[DiveCon]

if you werent so fucking stupid you would understand that the light being blocked could not have been blocked off by gypsum wall planks that WOULD BE DESTROYED before the photo was taken.

but you have yet to show any independent verifications of steel core columns or any image of them on 9-11.

you have proof that the gypsum wall planks would ALL have been destroyed by the collapse?

and EVERY photo is proof of steel core columns, dipshit

 

[Christophera]

Since it cannot be proven that gypsum would survive intact fastened to steel core columns after 100's of thousands of tons of steel crashed over it it is logical and reasonable to assume the gypsum, if it existed, would be stripped from the supposed steel core columns.

It is logical to assume this is concrete,



because the engineer of record identified a concrete core 2 days after 9-11

September 13, 2001​

 

[DiveCon]

Since it cannot be proven that gypsum would survive intact fastened to steel core columns after 100's of thousands of tons of steel crashed over it it is logical and reasonable to assume the gypsum, if it existed, would be stripped from the supposed steel core columns.

It is logical to assume this is concrete,



because the engineer of record identified a concrete core 2 days after 9-11

​

wrong again, dipshit
the reporter made that false claim

 

[Fizz]

It is logical to assume this is concrete,

your crap has already been debunked.

hey chris...

WHERE IS YOUR CONCRETE CORE?!!!

why cant you show us where the concrete core is? why is light shining through your concrete core? is it invisible?

 

[Christophera]

No light is seen shining through the core in that photo.

In this one it shines through the hallways.

And in the upper section it is obvious that there can be NO CONTINOUS COLUMNS. With a concrete tubular core it doesn't matter.

The light in the middle section is reflected of the inside of the concrete core wall which was very smooth from the dissassemblable steel inner concrete form.

 

[DiveCon]

No light is seen shining through the core in that photo.

In this one it shines through the hallways.

And in the upper section it is obvious that there can be NO CONTINOUS COLUMNS. With a concrete tubular core it doesn't matter.

The light in the middle section is reflected of the inside of the concrete core wall which was very smooth from the dissassemblable steel inner concrete form.

that photo PROVES there was NOT a concrete core as you have described

 

[Christophera]

As usual the opposite of what the agent says is closer to the truth.

Or, that photo proves, just as I say it does, that there were no steel core columns. It does this because it shows that they could not have been continuous, and they were supposed to have been.

Of course there are no official plans because the ex mayor of NYC took them in a violation of law.

 

[DiveCon]

As usual the opposite of what the agent says is closer to the truth.

Or, that photo proves, just as I say it does, that there were no steel core columns. It does this because it shows that they could not have been continuous, and they were supposed to have been.

Of course there are no official plans because the ex mayor of NYC took them in a violation of law.

and you must be an agent

and if the Mayor took something in violation of the law, he would have been convicted of it
he wasnt, you remain a delusional fucktard