FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

agent chri$$y only has one purpose, to mislead and deceive
 

Attachments

  • $Propaganda-Only-One-Word-186496.jpg
    $Propaganda-Only-One-Word-186496.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 7
The text of agents is not credible.

The evidence for a concrete core is independently verifying with substantial consistency.

The engineer of record gives information to a globally published magazine on September 13, 2001 identifying a concrete core.

On 9-11 we see what looks exactly like a concrete core should under the conditions.

southcorestands.gif


The supposed steel core columns are NEVER seen in the core area of either tower on 9-11.
 
The evidence for a concrete core is independently verifying with substantial consistency.

By who, Tard-El. Give us names or links to someone other than yourself that "independently" verifies a concrete core. Even the other 9/11 truth members of this board don't espouse a concrete core theory. If they did, they would be here backing you up.
 
ditz, if you worked for the perpetrators of mass murder, that would be a logical thing to say.







I mean considering you have no evidence, and only a false social group of peer agents to agree with each other in trying to conceal the factual elements of felony and treason.

The truth of the towers structures can be used to feasibly explain things. For example. Concerete can be easily fractured by a small amount of properly placed explosives to fall freely.

I just explained how free fall could be accomplished within what was seen and heard.

corefacesexploding.jpg


Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
 
Maybe lurkers can tell that tags are not properly done sometimes.

Concrete can be easily fractured by a small amount of properly placed explosives to fall freely.

The boards software has ceased, for me, for some weeks now, to have its quote function and normal array of controls for text formatting.
 
Maybe lurkers can tell that tags are not properly done sometimes.

Concrete can be easily fractured by a small amount of properly placed explosives to fall freely.

The boards software has ceased, for me, for some weeks now, to have its quote function and normal array of controls for text formatting.
not 12' thick concrete, you fucking MORON
sheesh you are truely delusional
 
ditz, if you worked for the perpetrators of mass murder, that would be a logical thing to say.







I mean considering you have no evidence, and only a false social group of peer agents to agree with each other in trying to conceal the factual elements of felony and treason.

The truth of the towers structures can be used to feasibly explain things. For example. Concerete can be easily fractured by a small amount of properly placed explosives to fall freely.

I just explained how free fall could be accomplished within what was seen and heard.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/corefacesexploding.jpg

[url]Robertson is verified by verifying [url=http://www.ncsea.com/downloads/wtcseerp.pdf]Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of [url=http://algoxy.com/psych/images/southcorestands.gif]WTC 2 core], verifying the [url=http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc2coreonto3.jpg]top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar[], just after the [url=http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc1spirecorewall.jpg]WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then[], the [url=http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww168/S_N_A_F_U/core_animation_75.gif]WTC 1 east shear wall toppling[], consistent with [url=http://algoxy.com/psych/images/shearspirewall.jpg]interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall[], consistent with ground zero showing the [url=http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg]WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick[], all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by , which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.[/quote]

I told you to come up with independent verification, not to report your own self-serving algoxy bullshit. What's the matter, Chris "Big Ears" El, can't you find ANYONE other than yourself that believes in a concrete core??
 
Agents going through the motions of denial of what is shown to be truth are very pitiful.


Not to mention they are supporting secret methods of mass murder and the demise of the US Constitution.
 
There are MANY people that realize the towers core was concrete. here is a video made by one who went out and found their own evidence.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2MStxGeRdE]YouTube - North Tower - Concrete Core[/ame]
 
Agents going through the motions of denial of what is shown to be truth are very pitiful.


Not to mention they are supporting secret methods of mass murder and the demise of the US Constitution.
and clearly, the opposite of what delusional dipshits say is more likely the truth
 
Concrete can be easily fractured by a small amount of properly placed explosives to fall freely.[/b]

Sure it can, Chrissy El. sure it can. And steel core columns can phase back and forth from columns to re-bar. And re-bar can be coated in C-4, have wet concrete poured on them, then after sitting for 30 years can be blown up using detonators that weren't even invented when the towers were built. And all this done under the watchful eye of the Dept of Defense, FEMA, NIST, and the Ironworkers Union.
 
When the statements of independent authority are consistent with hard evidence from the scene of the crime, the truth is seen.

Concrete is shown, steel core columns are never shown at any time. Construction photos are used to misrepresent the elevator guide rail support steel.
none of what you post is evidence
its just your delusional ranting and miss-comprehension of what you read
 
Concrete is shown

panel_5.jpg

OK Brown, you posted these pictures. You did, not anyone else, right?

So where, in either of these pictures YOU posted, is there even one ounce of concrete? Just one. Point it out to me, Brown, cause I'm having a hell of a hard time finding it for myself. Because all I see in both picture is STEEL, wood and cables.
 
Agents going through the motions of denial of what is shown to be truth are very pitiful.


Not to mention they are supporting secret methods of mass murder and the demise of the US Constitution.

there is no secret method of mass murder. 19 hijackers flew planes into buildings. its not a secret.

all your crap has been debunked already. got anything new? you keep trying to convince us that the sky is red. nobody is buying your bullshit. NOBODY!! :lol:

as someone that is "the chosen one" to lead people.... you dont have very many followers!! your such a failure in life. kicked out of school in the 8th grade. abandoning your kids and not paying the child support. getting sentenced to jail time. trying to convince people of your concrete core hoax.

this "chosen one" shit isnt working out too good for you, is it? :lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top