FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[DiveCon]

I have no evidence of a concrete core

there, fixed it to be 100% accurate

 

[Fizz]

delusional bullshit removed

you've already been shown that the structure in your picture is made out of steel. i'll add it to the list of your delusional crap thats already been debunked.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The delusional battle with the nitwits?

no wonder these threads go on forever.

 

[Fizz]

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

 

[Christophera]

All that crap and not one image from 9-11 of the core FEMA says existed.

While globally published authority states there was a concrete core.

Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992​

 

[Fizz]

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

 

[Christophera]

fiz debunked.

You try to say the same page that attempts to show the spire as inside the core also shows core columns in the core and the FEMA core of the diagram.

The Spires Demystified, 1 - Evidence based research
The Spires Demystified, 1 - Evidence based research

The site completely avoids addressing the object left of the spire.

Which is an end view of the WTC 1 west concrete core wall. The norht core wall has already fallen allowing a view into the empty core area.

 

[Christophera]

fiz debunked.

You try to say the same page that attempts to show the spire as inside the core also shows core columns in the core and the FEMA core of the diagram.

The Spires Demystified, 1 - Evidence based research
The Spires Demystified, 1 - Evidence based research

The site completely avoids addressing the object left of the spire.

Left of the spire is the west concrete core wall of WTC 1. The north core wall has already fallen revealing the empty core area.

 

[Fizz]

fiz debunked.

You try to say the same page that attempts to show the spire as inside the core also shows core columns in the core and the FEMA core of the diagram.

The Spires Demystified, 1 - Evidence based research
The Spires Demystified, 1 - Evidence based research

The site completely avoids addressing the object left of the spire.

Left of the spire is the west concrete core wall of WTC 1. The north core wall has already fallen revealing the empty core area.

you falsely claim there are no pics of the steel core columns on 9/11 and the picture above is of columns that existed outside the core (there were no columns outside the core other than the perimeter wall). they are core columns just like the ones that exist in the basic FEMA drawing.

there is no concrete in picture.

 

[Christophera]

fiz debunked.

You try to say the same page that attempts to show the spire as inside the core also shows core columns in the core and the FEMA core of the diagram.

The Spires Demystified, 1 - Evidence based research
The Spires Demystified, 1 - Evidence based research

The site completely avoids addressing the object left of the spire.

Left of the spire is the west concrete core wall of WTC 1. The north core wall has already fallen revealing the empty core area.

you falsely claim there are no pics of the steel core columns on 9/11 and the picture above is of columns that existed outside the core (there were no columns outside the core other than the perimeter wall). they are core columns just like the ones that exist in the basic FEMA drawing.

there is no concrete in picture.

Another text assertion, an erroneous one attempting to misinterpret the image from 9-11.

The image shows a single column with a structure too massive to be a "core column" to the left of it. The spire is flexing, it is steel. To the left is concrete, it does not visibly flex. It lacks any resemblence to steel.

You lack any reference from independent authority describing steel core columns. The concrete core has consistent evidence and reference from independent sources.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Fizz]

you are so delusion that i havent the slightest clue what yo uare talking about. in that picture i see steel core columns, smoke and debris....

and the verizon building.

what exactly are you claiming is concrete?

 

[DiveCon]

Another text assertion, an erroneous one attempting to misinterpret the image from 9-11.

The image shows a single column with a structure too massive to be a "core column" to the left of it. The spire is flexing, it is steel. To the left is concrete, it does not visibly flex. It lacks any resemblence to steel.

You lack any reference from independent authority describing steel core columns. The concrete core has consistent evidence and reference from independent sources.

<debunked delusional bullshit removed>.

you cant debunk truth and common sense with bullshit, moron

 

[DiveCon]

you are so delusion that i havent the slightest clue what yo uare talking about. in that picture i see steel core columns, smoke and debris....

and the verizon building.

what exactly are you claiming is concrete?

i think dipshit is calling the dust cloud his concrete core

 

[Christophera]

fiz debunked.

You try to say the same page that attempts to show the spire as inside the core also shows core columns in the core and the FEMA core of the diagram.

The Spires Demystified, 1 - Evidence based research
The Spires Demystified, 1 - Evidence based research

The site completely avoids addressing the object left of the spire.

Left of the spire is the west concrete core wall of WTC 1. The north core wall has already fallen revealing the empty core area.

you falsely claim there are no pics of the steel core columns on 9/11 and the picture above is of columns that existed outside the core (there were no columns outside the core other than the perimeter wall). they are core columns just like the ones that exist in the basic FEMA drawing.

there is no concrete in picture.

Another text assertion, an erroneous one attempting to misinterpret the image from 9-11.

The image shows a single column with a structure too massive to be a "core column" to the left of it. The spire is flexing, it is steel. To the left is concrete, it does not visibly flex. It lacks any resemblence to steel.

You lack any reference from independent authority describing steel core columns. The concrete core has consistent evidence and reference from independent sources.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Pretending you are a moron again? Pretending you can't read after your spam pushes the evidence to the second to the last page?

You really need to think of the human cost in lives that you are supporting by supporting the secret methods of mass murder.

 

[Fizz]

==delusional bullshit removed==

i bet not one person in any of your pictures believes your concrete core hoax. you are a complete jerkoff for posting pictures of grieving families.

 

[Christophera]

This is the hoax,

and the fact you haven't posted an image of it on 9-11 when the Towers were coming apart in front of cameras is because it did not exist.

The buildings engineer of record identifies a concrete core.

&#8220;Beyond the reaction that any citizen has&#8212;the sadness that we all feel&#8212;you have to understand, I worked long hours, seven days a week on this project back when I was young and energetic,&#8221; says the 73-year-old, his voice breaking with emotion. &#8220;It was just terrible to watch, painful and horrible.&#8221;
Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did&#8212;managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.
&#8220;If they had fallen down immediately, the death counts would have been unimaginable,&#8221; he says. &#8220;The World Trade Center has performed admirably, and everyone involved in the project should be proud.&#8221;

The Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 also identifies a concrete core.

The only core seen on 9-11 can only be identified as a concrete core.

 

[DiveCon]

I am a hoax.

fixed for accuracy

 

[Fizz]

==delusional bullshit removed==

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

 

[Christophera]

You garbage links is what is debunked, on the last page.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2385451-post6447.html

You support the FEMA deception and those pages are a joke. Not one image existes there or anywhere from 9-11 of the core structure FEMA says existed.

But there are lots of images of the concrete core from 9-11. The east concrete wall of WTC 1 core toppling into the empty core.

 

[DiveCon]

==delusional bullshit removed==

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

its astounding he can repeat the very same debunked bullshit over and over as if it hasnt been debunked already

the sign of someone truly delusional