FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

Agents, where is your photo of the FEMA
core on 9-11?

same old delusional bullshit over and over again that has already been debunked... :cuckoo:


1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

7. Anyone that disagrees with the concrete core hoax is a secret government agent. (totally delusional. needs no debunking)
 
A group of agents confirming they have no evidence. If they were not working to support secret methods of mass murder it would be funny.

You are the one supporting secret methods of mass murder by not posting your elevator dimensions. Or are you admitting you don't have any evidence?

KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, AGENT!!
 
Since fiz's debunk sites completely lacks any image of this core,

femacore.gif


in the core area on 9-11, fiz cannot, nor can any agent, nor has any agent ever, posted an image of that supposed steel core on 9-11.

The one image which might be misinterpreted as showing steel core columns in the core area is there. It is quite celar the image shows mostly the walls surrounding the core. Steel inner wall of the exoskeleton and concrete. The steel shown in the core is toppling out of the core all line and is no where near the center of the core area. No diagonals are seen.

Only single, unconnected vertical pieces are seen.

ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL SUPPORT STEEL is too weak to stand on 9-11 in the core.

Butt plates on the tops of the steel of the core are seen here and completely debunk any notion of "steel core columns". That is the only debunking going on in this thread.

panel_5.jpg
 
in the core area on 9-11, fiz cannot, nor can any agent, nor has any agent ever, posted an image of that supposed steel core on 9-11.

And you cannot post YOUR own elevator dimensions, which makes you an agent protecting and defending the secret methods of mass murder.
 
Since fiz's debunk sites completely lacks any image of this core,

femacore.gif


in the core area on 9-11, fiz cannot, nor can any agent, nor has any agent ever, posted an image of that supposed steel core on 9-11.

The one image which might be misinterpreted as showing steel core columns in the core area is there. It is quite celar the image shows mostly the walls surrounding the core. Steel inner wall of the exoskeleton and concrete. The steel shown in the core is toppling out of the core all line and is no where near the center of the core area. No diagonals are seen.

Only single, unconnected vertical pieces are seen.

ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL SUPPORT STEEL is too weak to stand on 9-11 in the core.

Butt plates on the tops of the steel of the core are seen here and completely debunk any notion of "steel core columns". That is the only debunking going on in this thread.

panel_5.jpg

you're a fucking idiot. the spire is the steel core columns on 9/11. you';ve seen the pictures thousands of times.

show your building plans that show steel core columns surrounding a concrete core. you cant because it didnt exist. there is no source. you made it up. show your source for "elevator guide rail support steel. you cant because there is no source. you lie and made it up. show pictures of a concrete core. fit the elevators inside your impossible concrete core.

you keep saying the same old delusion bullshit over and ever again that has already been proven wrong.
 
No, the spire is not even in the core area.

site1074.jpg


Superimposed it is outside the core near the NW core corner.

superimp.spire.wtc1.jpg


From th north after the north core wall falls the empty core is seen to the left of the concrete core wall. Right of that is the spire.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg


There was only one spire, and it was outside the core area.
 
You have been shown to be wrong by photographic evidence.

You have no image from 9-11 showing the FEMA core.

There is independently verified evidence for the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Besides, it provides explanations for the unique aspects.

Five phenomenal factors of 9-11

The perps must work very hard to try and prevent explanations for those things, but they are explained.
 
the one pic is from a completely different angle in chrissypoo's lie.
look at the space between the two buildings on the far left!!
214_fema_report_2050081722-9661.jpg


now look at how they line up when taken from the spot the spire photos were taken from.
9790d1269213739-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-wtc-fizz7.jpg


fucking moron!! :lol:
 
Last edited:
Still looks like the NW corner of the inner wall of the steel exoskeleton.

Where is the image of this core on 9-11?

femacore.gif







No, it hasn't been posted agent.
 
Still looks like the NW corner of the inner wall of the steel exoskeleton.

Where is the image of this core on 9-11?

femacore.gif







No, it hasn't been posted agent.

thanks for admitting your picture is wrong. :lol:

now look at the picture that actually is an accurate overlay. it is clearly the center two rows of the steel core.

did you ever show us your source for your claim that "the concrete core was surrounded by interior box columns"??!! i didnt think so. its something else you made up. :cuckoo:
 
Still looks like the NW corner of the inner wall of the steel exoskeleton.

Where is the image of this core on 9-11?

No, it hasn't been posted agent.
there was no "exoskeleton" on the core, dipshit
the core was the skeleton
and the image has been posted by YOU several times, only you make claims about it not actually supported by the image


and there are ZERO agents here, the only agents are your imagination
 
Still looks like the NW corner of the inner wall of the steel exoskeleton.

Where is the image of this core on 9-11?

No, it hasn't been posted agent.
there was no "exoskeleton" on the core, dipshit
the core was the skeleton
and the image has been posted by YOU several times, only you make claims about it not actually supported by the image


and there are ZERO agents here, the only agents are your imagination

now he's claiming there was an exoskeleton? that's new. the Hancock Center in Chicago has an exoskeleton and people claim it wouldn't have collapsed had it been hit.
 
Still looks like the NW corner of the inner wall of the steel exoskeleton.

Where is the image of this core on 9-11?

No, it hasn't been posted agent.
there was no "exoskeleton" on the core, dipshit
the core was the skeleton
and the image has been posted by YOU several times, only you make claims about it not actually supported by the image


and there are ZERO agents here, the only agents are your imagination

now he's claiming there was an exoskeleton? that's new. the Hancock Center in Chicago has an exoskeleton and people claim it wouldn't have collapsed had it been hit.
not exactly
he is claiming an exoskeleton around his invisacrete core
 

Forum List

Back
Top