FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

No, I post images of concrete.

southcorestands.gif


And globally published articles where the engineer of record identifies a concrete core.

What happens all the time is you fail to post images of the supposed steel core columns and your false social group of agents posts spam and ad hominium because they have no evidence.

your article was never published. you lie about what robertson said. not one expert ever looked at your picture and claimed that it shows concrete.

did you figure out how to fit all those elevators inside your impossible concrete core yet?

The artical not only was published it is still published.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/75780

and you have no source of dimensions agent.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2470264-post2812.html
 
No, I post images of concrete.



And globally published articles where the engineer of record identifies a concrete core.

What happens all the time is you fail to post images of the supposed steel core columns and your false social group of agents posts spam and ad hominium because they have no evidence.

your article was never published. you lie about what robertson said. not one expert ever looked at your picture and claimed that it shows concrete.

did you figure out how to fit all those elevators inside your impossible concrete core yet?

The artical not only was published it is still published.



and you have no source of dimensions agent.
lies
putting it on a web page isnt exactly the same as if it was in their magazine
you stiill dont get it that Robertson never said it
 
No, I post images of concrete.

southcorestands.gif


And globally published articles where the engineer of record identifies a concrete core.

What happens all the time is you fail to post images of the supposed steel core columns and your false social group of agents posts spam and ad hominium because they have no evidence.

your article was never published. you lie about what robertson said. not one expert ever looked at your picture and claimed that it shows concrete.

did you figure out how to fit all those elevators inside your impossible concrete core yet?

The artical not only was published it is still published.

World Trade Center Engineer Leslie Robertson on 9/11 Attack, Building Collapse - Newsweek

and you have no source of dimensions agent.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2470264-post2812.html

the ARTICAL is an internet only article. it wasnt in the magazine. there was no magazine published on the 13th. the reporter said there was a concrete core. you lie and claim it was the engineer. anyone that actually looks at your link can see you are a liar. feel free to keep posting it and proving how stupid your whole concrete core hoax is!!! :cuckoo:

i dont need dimensions for elevators. i'm not the one claiming it was a concrete core. you cant make the elevators fit!!! :lol:

the elevator company says the express elevators had a floor space of 7.8 meters. good luck getting everything to fit inside your hoax!! :lol:
 
Every word needs proof. Your text is worthless.

There was a concrete core.

southcorestands.gif


Just like.

Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992

Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6

said. Verifying the Newsweek article. A safety report to FEMA (chap 2.1) identifies a concrete core.

The earth is 196,950 sq. mi. and there is no room for agents.
 
Every word needs proof. Your text is worthless.

There was a concrete core.

southcorestands.gif

your text assertions are meaningless. every one of your claims has been proven to be a lie. you still post a pictures of something clearly made out of steel when seen from the other side, you lying fuck!!

corecloseupbest.jpg


where's the concrete core?!! :lol:
im_652_lg.jpg


where's the concrete core? :lol:
im_580_lg.jpg


where's the concrete core?!! :lol:
im_837_lg.jpg


where's the concrete core? :lol:
9689d1268553338-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-screencaptureinsidewtc.jpg


where's the concrete core? :lol:
9999004211-l-full.jpg


where's the concrete core? :lol:
9983d1271115398-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-5712.jpg


9973d1271009130-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-wtccoreshilouette-where.jpg
 
Every word needs proof. Your text is worthless.

There was a concrete core.

southcorestands.gif

your text assertions are meaningless. every one of your claims has been proven to be a lie. you still post a pictures of something clearly made out of steel when seen from the other side, you lying fuck!!

corecloseupbest.jpg

stanifiz, you show the interior box columns, columns not in the core. You misrepresent them as being in the core.

At 9 seconds both south hallways are visible in the concrete core of WTC 2.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhNd48qx684&feature=related[/ame]

A portion of the east core wall of WTC 1 topples into the empty core.

core_animation_75.gif


where's the concrete core?!! :lol:
im_652_lg.jpg

The dark lines behind the interior box columns are rebar.
You've posted an image of the beginning of the outer concrete forms for WTC 2.

where's the concrete core? :lol:
im_580_lg.jpg


No. where's the diagonal braces and gusset plates a steel core needs??

If there are none the building won't stand just like your supposed core did not stand when 9-11 exposes the core to the light of day in front of cameras.

REBAR

spire_dust-3.jpg


where's the concrete core?!! :lol:
im_837_lg.jpg


About a foot the right of the right edge of the photo. The top floors of WTC had perhaps 12 feet between the concrete and the interior box columns as the concrete tapered.

That still doesn't look like the Twins to me anyway. The floor over the hard hat is too far above it.

The same with the video. The core is on the left behind the interior box columns.








REBAR

spire_dust-3.jpg


where's the concrete core? :lol:
9999004211-l-full.jpg
]



where's the concrete core? :lol:
9983d1271115398-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-5712.jpg


9973d1271009130-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-wtccoreshilouette-where.jpg
 
the dark lines behind the interior box columns are rebar.
You've posted an image of the beginning of the outer concrete forms for wtc 2.

No, the dark lines behind the core columns are shadows from the scaffolding, you retarded piece of walking garbage.
 
Last edited:
Wrong.

This is structural steel, but it is not inside the core.

site1074.jpg


It is the corner of the inner wall of outer steel framework.

superimp.spire.wtc1.jpg


OUTSIDE the concrete core wall as seen looking from the north at WTC 1's west core wall in an end view after the north core wall has already fallen showing an empty core.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg
 
Wrong.

This is structural steel, but it is not inside the core.

WRONG!!!!!!


It is the corner of the inner wall of outer steel framework.

WRONG!!!!

OUTSIDE the concrete core wall as seen looking from the north at WTC 1's west core wall in an end view after the north core wall has already fallen showing an empty core.

WRONG!!!!

They're all photos of the steel core columns. There was no concrete core, you retarded waste of oxygen & protoplasm.
 
Last edited:
Wrong.

This is structural steel, but it is not inside the core.



It is the corner of the inner wall of outer steel framework.



OUTSIDE the concrete core wall as seen looking from the north at WTC 1's west core wall in an end view after the north core wall has already fallen showing an empty core.

OMG you dont have a fucking clue
 
Your text is useless in your efforts of concealing treason.

What no agent has is independently verified evidence.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
 
Your text is useless in your efforts of concealing treason.
your text is completely meaningless. just like your life. anyone can check your links and see you are a liar.

show us pictures of the actual concrete core. not some smoky or dusty crap that you say has concrete but actually doesnt. (nobody but you sees concrete in your pictures)

did you figure out a way to fit all those elevators inside your impossible concrete core yet? you fucked up chris. when you added all that concrete you had to subtract space from someplace else.

THE ELEVATORS DONT FIT INSIDE YOUR CONCRETE CORE!!! :lol:
 
i haven't the time or inclination to read 465 pages of this

just tell me when the next attack is

i'd like to make a few timely investments this time around

~S~
 
Agents, where is your photo of the FEMA
core on 9-11?

We need to see that thing with all of its diagonal braces and gusset plates, since you cannot show a construction image of them.

This one photo disproves that the steel in the core was "core column". Butt plates on the tops of steel are too weak to use for joining sections of "core column" anywhere in the core.

panel_5.jpg


A steel core must have absolutely uniform and maximum strength. Only a 100% deep fillet weld can be used to join sections like is seen here on and "I" beam.

fillet.diagram.gif
 
agents, where is your photo of the core on 9-11?

We need to see that thing with all of its diagonal braces and gusset plates, since you cannot show a construction image of them.

This one photo disproves that the steel in the core was "core column". Butt plates on the tops of steel are too weak to use for joining sections of "core column" anywhere in the core.

A steel core must have absolutely uniform and maximum strength. Only a 100% deep fillet weld can be used to join sections like is seen here on and "i" beam.

$dancing blue-footed booby.jpg
And here's Chri$$y, leading his only follower down the looney trail.
 

Forum List

Back
Top