FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

once again the moron shows the steel columns of the steel core and makes absurd claims about concrete.

your text is meaningless nobody looks at that picture and sees a concrete core except you.


and thats because you are a delusional moron. :lol:
 
Apprently ditzer thinks that gypsum reflects light. Concrete does, barely, but that works best when steel forms are used.

Ahy haven't you posted an image of this core on 9-11?

femacore.gif


No, images of the steel core on 9-11 has not been posted.

All that has been posted are misrepresentations and spam.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2109077-post4648.html

SPAM12
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2055868-post4036.html

SPAM6
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1914220-post3527.html


FIZZ SPAM
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html


BERKLEY ERRORS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1904734-post3480.html


TIME MAGAZINE ERRORS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1904673-post3478.html


SPAM 4-POSTING UNKNOWN STRUCTURE CALLING IT WTC TWIN
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1897888-post3456.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2101197-post703.html

SPAMLIES
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092286-post4462.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092925-post4471.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092951-post4474.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092948-post4473.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092980-post4477.html

ARTICLE BY ARTICLE

NYTimes.com

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2313202-post1982.html


TOTAL FAKE CORE PHOTO SLAM

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2418466-post6644.html
 
Apprently ditzer thinks that gypsum reflects light. Concrete does, barely, but that works best when steel forms are used.
apparently dipshits don't know what the fuck they are talking about
since the gypsum wall planks were also not visible on the inside because of wall treatments or PAINT
you really are too fucking stupid for words
 
Apprently ditzer thinks that gypsum reflects light. Concrete does, barely, but that works best when steel forms are used.
apparently dipshits don't know what the fuck they are talking about
since the gypsum wall planks were also not visible on the inside because of wall treatments or PAINT
you really are too fucking stupid for words
doesnt matter anyway. what he is calling "hallways" leave no room for elevators. :cuckoo:

he's too fucked up to realize that the more he tries to show evidence of his impossible concrete core the more he proves it was impossible and the core is actually steel.:cuckoo:

the fucking moron tries to post pictures of concrete that contain only steel!! :lol:
 
Apprently ditzer thinks that gypsum reflects light. Concrete does, barely, but that works best when steel forms are used.
apparently dipshits don't know what the fuck they are talking about
since the gypsum wall planks were also not visible on the inside because of wall treatments or PAINT
you really are too fucking stupid for words
doesnt matter anyway. what he is calling "hallways" leave no room for elevators. :cuckoo:

he's too fucked up to realize that the more he tries to show evidence of his impossible concrete core the more he proves it was impossible and the core is actually steel.:cuckoo:

the fucking moron tries to post pictures of concrete that contain only steel!! :lol:
i know
he is the only one that sees concrete in ANY of his photos
 
apparently dipshits don't know what the fuck they are talking about
since the gypsum wall planks were also not visible on the inside because of wall treatments or PAINT
you really are too fucking stupid for words
doesnt matter anyway. what he is calling "hallways" leave no room for elevators. :cuckoo:

he's too fucked up to realize that the more he tries to show evidence of his impossible concrete core the more he proves it was impossible and the core is actually steel.:cuckoo:

the fucking moron tries to post pictures of concrete that contain only steel!! :lol:
i know
he is the only one that sees concrete in ANY of his photos

There is a moment during the collapse where you can see Satan's face.
 
This is what kills your theory right here. Since the 16' wide skylobby hallways MUST oppose each other, you've just eliminated 32' of your 80' wide core size. You see, in the lower third of the towers, you must leave room for the two banks of express elevator shafts to reach the 44th floor skylobby and above. Let's look at the next picture I annotated.
corelobbydim.png


Since the first floor (right below the mezzanine) 16' wide lobby hallway has to offset from the 44th floor 16' wide skylobby hallway, that's what we see in the picture above. The two banks of express elevators need shafdts that go from the first floor to the 44th floor and past. Here is a photo of the first floor 16' wide hallway used to gain access to not only the express elevators, but the first 24 local elevators used to get to any floors in the first third of the tower. The blue box outlines the 16' wide hallway. The red box shows where the bank of express elevators were located:
hallwaybank.jpg


Here is the opposed 16' hallway on the 44th floor. Notice the "44" plaque on the inside face of the elevator access door. Also in that photo is the access hallways for the 24 local elevators. They are the "lighted" openeings on the left. There is also the single "dark" hallway in the middle on both sides:
44thskylobbyphoto1.jpg


So there is your MAJOR problem Chris. You have left no room for the two banks of express elevator banks that we have PHOTOGRAPHIC and WRITTEN proof of. Your core, as you have it located, has removed any usable space for the 23 express elevator shafts (two banks) needed to run through the core.

You have created a physical impossibility. The fact that you claim you are a draftsman and have done blueprints is pure bullshit as ANY draftsman/designer would have laid this out in a scaled drawing to make sure it all fits before making up bogus claims and lies.

You have been proven WRONG. The only way out is to make a scaled drawing and fit everything in the core you have created.

IT CAN'T BE DONE!

You and your theory are done!
:razz:
 
You and your elevators cannot prove steel core columns. You and your fake plans cannot disprove the concrete core.

The faked WTC 1 plans

You are pitiful agent.

The obsolete plans by Robertson sent to Yamasaki to present the towers concept have been digitally altered to appear as final drawings by the addition of revision tables after the blueprints were scanned.

The anomalies in the cells are not possible with a scan from the scale of the blueprint. Pixel straight lines and spaces are not possible and those ARE NOT characters of the alphabet.

A-A-159.revtab.jpg


In addition is it credible that the plans for the 2 tallest buldings in the world at the time have a free hand lettered title block?

1967fakeplan.titblk.jpg


No, not credible.

It is credible that the agents are here dissing the concrete core because it is the key to understanding and feasibly explaining what happened. Or how 3,000 were killed in 20 seconds.

The perpetrators would not want anyone to understand or explain that.
 
You and your elevators cannot prove steel core columns. You and your fake plans cannot disprove the concrete core.

I already have. I don't need the plans. I just use the dimensions and information you have given. Why doesn't it all fit your core Chris?

You've created an impossibility!!!!

Nice job idiot!

:lol::lol::lol:
 
See, here's where you fail Chris.

Where were the two banks of express elevators located? Right next to your long axis core walls?

Were the express elevators rated for 55 people and 10,000 lbs.?
 
cannot disprove the concrete core.
already been disproved. Not one person is coming to your defence. Nobody believes you. Nobody.

Now we're just fucking with u because your an asshole for posting pics of the families.
:lol:
 
Text denials are destroyed in the face of hard, independently verified evidence.

Explain again how you want people to thinkthis is a floor and where it fell from to get vertical . . . agent.

core_animation_75.gif
 
Text denials are destroyed in the face of hard, independently verified evidence.

Explain again how you want people to thinkthis is a floor and where it fell from to get vertical . . . agent.

core_animation_75.gif
you are such a fucking moron
it fell from less than vertical
that was NEVER vertical in that gif
it was clearly a floor
 
Text denials are destroyed in the face of hard, independently verified evidence.

great. let us know when you come up with any independently verified evidence.

so far, all you have is your stupid text assertions that you have independently verified evidence but you havent posted any yet.

did you figure out how to fit all those elevators into your impossible concrete core yet? :lol:
 
No one has ever debunked any of the independently verified evidence showing a concrete core in the center of the Twin Towers.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Text response or spam misrepresetations, and outright lies are exposed.

D
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068183-post334.html

D-agent
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2104806-post4606.html

D-rebar & plan links
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2331142-post6209.html

F+D exposed
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2104963-post4610.html

D-SPIRE
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2476643-post7012.html

F+obvious image
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2117758-post842.html

F
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1966323-post158.html

F
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1992513-post3708.html

F+
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068719-post4238.html

F+photo lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2093387-post4486.html

F+photo lie 2
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2094648-post4499.html

F+photoshop lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2097563-post650.html

F+plans lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2290147-post1829.html

F+mayor microfilm lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2429160-post6710.html

F+plan lie confirm
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2290723-post1832.html

F+buckling north tower
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2379590-post2345.html

F+buckling
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2380272-post2348.html



F+newsweek lied
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2431343-post6755.html

F+CAB trounces liar
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2431371-post6756.html

F+misinterp
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2456171-post2744.html

CAB proves it
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2458493-post2745.html

F&G-slam-plans-dimensions-spire
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2483938-post7050.html

PRETENDING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2484417-post2891.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2513013-post2999.html

Agent posts are completely contrived artifice and well exposed as such.


SPAM12
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2055868-post4036.html

SPAM6
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1914220-post3527.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2109077-post4648.html



FIZZ SPAM
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html


BERKLEY ERRORS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1904734-post3480.html


TIME MAGAZINE ERRORS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1904673-post3478.html


SPAM 4-POSTING UNKNOWN STRUCTURE CALLING IT WTC TWIN
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1897888-post3456.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2101197-post703.html

SPAMLIES
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092286-post4462.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092925-post4471.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092951-post4474.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092948-post4473.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2092980-post4477.html

ARTICLE BY ARTICLE

NYTimes.com

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2313202-post1982.html


TOTAL FAKE/SPAM CORE PHOTO SLAM
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2418466-post6644.html
 
you apparently don't know what "independently verified" means.

i suggest you look into it. the more you claim your little paragraph is "independently verified" the more we laugh at you!! :lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top