FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

Why haven't any agents posted an image of the FEMA core on 9-11?

femacore.gif


Obviously if such a core existed it would be standing in the core area on 9-11. Why haven't you posted that?

Why haven't you acknowledged that the violations of law conducted by the ex mayor deprived the public of 6,000 photo files and that civic center document normally include building plans. Meaning that guiliani took the plans and locked them in his warehouse.
 
#1 The infiltrating perpetrators of the US gov seeking to destroy the Constitution and the union it serves, would want you to say what you've said. They would definiitely deny their agents are working a post 9-11 psyops on the internet.

#2 The infiltrating perpetrators of the US gov seeking to destroy the Constitution and the union it serves, would want you to misrepresent the fact no one has EVER posted an image of the supposed steel core columns in the core area.

#3 The infiltrating perpetrators of the US gov seeking to destroy the Constitution and the union it serves, would want people to believe what you post.

The perpetrators of mass murder upon 3,000 innocent people in 20 seconds would NOT want anyone to realize there was a concrete core.

Independently verified evidence showing a concrete core with consistency.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
 
Last edited:
Why haven't any agents posted an image of the FEMA core on 9-11?

why are you still alive?

clearly anyone that killed 3000 people would have absolutely no problem making it 3001 to keep their secret if some fucking idiot in california decided to expose their massive plan.

just that fact that you are still breathing proves you are wrong. :lol:
 
The independently verified evidence proves there is a concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Your post proves you are an agent. Those 2 things are all that is prove here.

Are you hoping the perpetrators will kill more people?

sepember_11_boy_1.jpg
 
The independently verified evidence proves there is a concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Your post proves you are an agent. Those 2 things are all that is proven here.

Are you hoping the perpetrators, your masters, will kill more people?

sepember_11_boy_1.jpg
 
so "the perpetrators" killed 3000 people but are not killing you and letting you blab to the entire wolrd their explosive concrete core.

sorry. that's moronic. the proof that your are wrong is that you are still alive. :lol:
 
so "the perpetrators" killed 3000 people but are not killing you and letting you blab to the entire wolrd their explosive concrete core.

sorry. that's moronic. the proof that your are wrong is that you are still alive. :lol:

The fact of the evidence reasonably consistent in all ways with the independent verifications of authority prove the towers core to be concrete, that is one thing,

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Expecting a low life agent to understand this is too much, but do you know the bad the karma gained is for killing people that are not trying to harm you, or even may be trying to help you in anything good you might do?
 
so "the perpetrators" killed 3000 people but are not killing you and letting you blab to the entire wolrd their explosive concrete core.

sorry. that's moronic. the proof that your are wrong is that you are still alive. :lol:

The fact of the evidence reasonably consistent in all ways with the independent verifications of authority prove the towers core to be concrete, that is one thing,

<delusional bullshit deleted>
your delusional bullshit is not evidence
 
We shall see who is delusional.



Tell us from where what you try to call a floor fell from, so you can fulfill the the need to explain the object we see toppling inwards that looks like a wall.

core_animation_75.gif
 
We shall see who is delusional.



Tell us from where what you try to call a floor fell from, so you can fulfill the the need to explain the object we see toppling inwards that looks like a wall.

core_animation_75.gif
already answered you delusional fucktard
it could have been any number of floors


it couldnt have been a wall, since that was no concrete in the core above grade as proven by EVERY set of plans known to man

have you noticed it was never vertical ever in your gif?
 
Last edited:
the proof you are wrong is that you are still alive. if "the perpetraors" killed 3000 people they would have no problem at all killing one more moron trying to expose their deeds. :cuckoo:

if you die then i might start taking your claims more seriously.

... but i doubt it. its all just way too delusional.
 
the proof you are wrong is that you are still alive. if "the perpetraors" killed 3000 people they would have no problem at all killing one more moron trying to expose their deeds. :cuckoo:

if you die then i might start taking your claims more seriously.

... but i doubt it. its all just way too delusional.
Occam's Razor fails on the delusional
 
the proof you are wrong is that you are still alive. if "the perpetraors" killed 3000 people they would have no problem at all killing one more moron trying to expose their deeds. :cuckoo:

if you die then i might start taking your claims more seriously.

... but i doubt it. its all just way too delusional.
Occam's Razor fails on the delusional

yep!!


its all just really fucking stupid on so many levels. he lies about what people say (as with robertson). he looks at pictures and sees concrete where nobody else does. he makes shit up like "elevator guide rail support" and other crap with absolutely nothing to back the claim up. he changes his story all the time when proven wrong. there's actual pictures of the actual steel core. he needs to use so much concrete for a concrete core that the elevators dont fit inside anymore.....

it's all just so fucking retarded!! :lol:
 
We shall see who is delusional.



Tell us from where what you try to call a floor fell from, so you can fulfill the the need to explain the object we see toppling inwards that looks like a wall.

core_animation_75.gif

First of all, those animations are pixelated and blurry. Second, it looks just like columns toppling over and dust streaming from behind. The reason it looks lighter in color is that the sun is hitting the dust and debris. Notice BEHIND that particular column with dust, is a darker area which seems to have the sun blocked from hitting it. Why couldn't that be the stairwell? You know. The one whose remnants are shown here in this photo:
columnspace.jpg
 
Chris,

Were the express elevators for the towers rated for 55 people and 10,000 lbs.?

Yes or no?
 
gumjobs evasion into elevator trivia simply demonstrates that gummie has no evidence of steel core columns other than.

Gummie pretends to think that I've said there was 20 feet between the interior box column and the first row of elevator guide rail support.

What I said gumout, is that there was 20 feet between interior box colummns along the line of the wall.

You've disposed of your credibility with your statements about the wall toppling into the core area.

core_animation_75.gif


Argue wih fuz'n-divot about that. They say its a floor.
 
Last edited:
"elevator trivia" is only trivial if you think its unimportant that the elevators be able to fit inside your concrete core. they don't. you've been exposed as a fraud...... AGAIN!!!
 
"elevator trivia" is only trivial if you think its unimportant that the elevators be able to fit inside your concrete core. they don't. you've been exposed as a fraud...... AGAIN!!!
he was exposed as a fraud long before that
just the fact that the WTC towers were SOLD by the fact of having the steel core and not concrete was enough for me
i had seen documentaries back in the 80's and 90's about the building of the towers
not one of them EVER claimed concrete in the core
in fact, they espoused the fact it had NONE because of the floor space it saved
 

Forum List

Back
Top