Files confirm trump did not visit Epstein home or island

Trump never visited Epstein. Trump is mentioned four times in investigating documents. Two girls testified that they saw him in public at his casino. Two other girls testified that they had never given Trump a massage nor did he flirt with them.

But Trump was mentioned FOUR times. That has to count for something.

It's alledged he did...


Screenshot_20240104_153826_Drive.jpg
 
The thugs there that day were Trump's people.
No you are misinformed, thus disinforming. The thugs that day were The Usual Suspects BLM antfi the FBI the capital police possibly the CIA. It was all a planned operation of provocation and deception. Very true Trump supporters should have stayed away.
 
Also forgetting that Herman Caine died of cancer.

Idiot, Cain survived cancer...


He died from catching covid at one of Trump's super spreader events...

 
No you are misinformed, thus disinforming. The thugs that day were The Usual Suspects BLM antfi the FBI the capital police possibly the CIA. It was all a planned operation of provocation and deception. Very true Trump supporters should have stayed away.

:cuckoo:
 
No no I don't think you did. You just posted the blurb. Are you stupid?

rotfl-gif.288736
 
Where did you get the blurb? Inquiring minds want to know. People that aren't rolling on the floor laughing, of which you are the only one LOL

I can't help but laugh my ass off at you for asking if I'm stupid when you prove to be too stupid to know I posted a link to that blurb.

rotfl-gif.288736
 
Some people are so stupid that they believe calling someone "terrific" is necessarily a compliment. It's not.

Trump also called Epstein out for loving women "on the younger side". The younger side of what? Obviously, the younger side of legal.

Trump publicly called him out using verbiage that could not get him sued by Epstein. He's got the best words.
Donald Trump said in 2002 that Jeffrey Epstein was a "terrific guy," and added, "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."


On July 6, 2019, Epstein was arrested and indicted on charges of the sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors.

Three days later, on July 9, Trump was asked by an unidentified reporter in the Oval Office, "Do you still think Jeffrey Epstein is a 'terrific guy?'"

In response, Trump said three times that he was not a "fan" of Epstein's:

Exactly what a Politian would say when someone he knows has legal problems.
or the well known "doth protest too much"
 
Last edited:
  • Fact
Reactions: IM2
LOL

Now that's funny coming from the idiot who can't find a link in a post where I said I posted a link to the source of that blurb.
No no you didn't. You're welcome to point out where you did. Moron btw please learn to spell

Screenshot_20240104-130651_Samsung Internet.jpg

Screenshot_20240104-130610_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Do you have a link to that little blurb?
I followed that case in all its iterations for years. That's not the real name of the girl, if there was a girl. A handwritten complaint was filed several times in California federal Court and dismissed. The last dismissal, a judge said that California was the wrong court. The next complaint was filed in New York. It too was dismissed with the judge remarking that she needed an attorney to draft the complaint. For months nothing happened, then a patent attorney from New Jersey stepped up and drafted a complaint. But, "Katie" refused to have it served citing fear for her life. The attorney asked if the case could proceed without formal service. Nooooo, of course not. Trump had a designated agent for service of process. Serve it and move on. By this time, Katie would be well into her 30s. Claims of fear were no longer credible. Without service of process, the claim eventually came up for dismissal. The attorney tried to save it but the Judge said not without an explanation from Katie. She was ordered to appear. N9 one had ever seen her. Not even the attorney. She communicated through various surrogates.

The complaint was dismissed for lack of prosecution. The judge also ordered that any further filings had to have prior approval of the court. That was the end, ten or so years ago.
 

Forum List

Back
Top