Finally! Supreme Court rules in favor of First Amendment rights for Christians etc.

[strollingbones]

Most of the leftists here are too stupid to understand the distinction and too dishonest to admit that they would not want to be forced to express opinions they did not support, either.

Says the admitted liar

 

[Donald H]

No you didn't. You made the typical leftist effort to start a food fight and derail the thread.

I think you're appealing to this forum's court for relief.

There's really no need, I'm finished with the topic voluntarily.

 

[martybegan]

Now I've convinced you to dig your hole deeper Marty!

Now you can't answer why we shouldn't force Jewish or Muslim stores to sell pork if we can force bakers to bake the cake or else.....

 

[Foxfyre]

I think you're appealing to this forum's court for relief.

There's really no need, I'm finished with the topic voluntarily.

Wonderful! Splendid! Much appreciated! Do have a wonderful day.

 

[Foxfyre]

Now you can't answer why we shouldn't force Jewish or Muslim stores to sell pork if we can force bakers to bake the cake or else.....

Exactly. Why should any proprietor be required to offer products or services he/she does not choose to offer so long as nobody is discriminated against who wants the products and services the proprietor does offer?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Says the admitted liar

Hey, look, it's my very favorite hillbilly crack whore. Long time, no see.

What are you claiming I have lied about?

 

[rightwinger]

Again, not like those services are unique, or timely, or only provided by Christians who would deny the work.

All wedding services for same sex weddings are now subject to denial.
Conservatives hiding their bigotry behind their religion.

The Supreme Court should be ashamed

They are just biding their time till they can abolish same sex weddings

 

[martybegan]

All wedding services for same sex weddings are now subject to denial.
Conservatives hiding their bigotry behind their religion.

The Supreme Court should be ashamed

They are just biding their time till they can abolish same sex weddings

The denial rate will be miniscule.

The services are easily replicable and non-timely.

 

[westwall]

Talk about hyperbole.

They can still get websites made, it's not like all website designers are Christian.

This doesn't target actual public accommodations, or point of sale items, just contracted expressions of someone's labor.

Correct, the little fascist, Donald duck likes slavery. He has said so many times.

 

[westwall]

All wedding services for same sex weddings are now subject to denial.
Conservatives hiding their bigotry behind their religion.

The Supreme Court should be ashamed

They are just biding their time till they can abolish same sex weddings

Try taking your bullshit to a Muslim. See how long you last.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

What it means is that same sex couples can be denied wedding related services by bigoted Conservatives hiding under their Christianity.

No reception hall, invitations, cake, limo, hotel room ….…all in the name of Jesus

Not at all. Which one of those services requires the provider to express an opinion or belief they disagree with?

 

[martybegan]

Not at all. Which one of those services requires the provider to express an opinion or belief they disagree with?

The only one that should be a "no" is hotel rooms, which are actual PA's. The others are contracted services.

 

[westwall]

So if someone thinks a mixed couple is "offensive" they don't have to seat them at a restaurant?

Again..you'e supporting discrimination.

Point of sale isn't affected, dummy. What the Ruling stipulates is you may not FORCE people to work against their will.

In other words no slavery!

DURRRRRR

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It also opens up opportunities for artists to specifically target same sex couples.

 

[rightwinger]

And why shouldn't Christians be allowed to provide services for those they agree with?

Ever seen a "We reserve the right to refuse service" sign?

This isn't about denial of service, this is about forcing Christians or other to deny their beliefs

Public accommodations
If you provide a service to one, you have to provide for all.
We don’t serve blacks, we do not serve gays is not tolerated

You don’t have to approve of a married couple but you can’t deny services

 

[martybegan]

Public accommodations
If you provide a service to one, you have to provide for all.
We don’t serve blacks, we do not serve gays is not tolerated

You don’t have to approve of a married couple but you can’t deny services

But things like contracted services aren't PA's. Expect the court to further clarify this.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The only one that should be a "no" is hotel rooms, which are actual PA's. The others are contracted services.

Only the invitations and cake require individual artistic talent.

 

[rightwinger]

It also opens up opportunities for artists to specifically target same sex couples.

Not in strict conservative (Red) areas
They will give the Bud Light treatment to anyone who serves gays

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Public accommodations
If you provide a service to one, you have to provide for all.
We don’t serve blacks, we do not serve gays is not tolerated

You don’t have to approve of a married couple but you can’t deny services

But you can deny your artistic expression.

 

[XponentialChaos]

The baker issue was already settled.

The problem with conservatives is that they’re incredibly short-sighted. They don’t consider that the same thing might come back at them from the other direction, which is exactly what happened not long ago.

Nashville flower shop refuses service to Republican event, blames GOP for Christian school shooting

A Nashville flower shop refused service to a Republican fundraiser in an attempt to call for stricter gun laws in the state.

www.foxnews.com

How many conservatives were fine with the baker refusing the gay wedding cake but have a big problem with a florist who doesn’t want to serve Republicans? Before anyone asks, I’m fine with both. It’s fair.