"Fingerprint" of Greenland ice melt seen in satellite sea level data

[Toddsterpatriot]

I do doubt your fridge could trigger a glacial advance.

Why? I moved heat from one spot to another, just like the solar farm.

 

[Old Rocks]

Thank goodness. As bad as warmer is, advancing glaciers would be 10 times worse.

Advancing glaciers would be over a time period of many thousands of years., The warming we are seeing is happening over a period of decades. This is very much like the difference of bumping your car into a brick wall at 5 mph or doing the same at 100 mph. The outcome of the latter is going to be rather more serious than the former.

 

[ding]

Oh look, another Dunning-Kruger dumb fuck. The scientists that worked on this study are paid a lot less than the shills that whore their credentials for the fossil fuel corporations.

By calling him a dumb fuck you inadvertently became a textbook example of the dunning effect.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I need a paper refuting the paper which measured an incremental cooling effect at six solar farms during daylight hours when photons were being converted into electricity instead of producing heat on the earth’s surface.

Moving heat from point A to point B doesn't destroy the heat. Doesn't reduce total heat.

 

[ding]

Why? I moved heat from one spot to another, just like the solar farm.

How does waste heat from electricity usage heat the surface of the planet like photons do?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There’s no incremental change in waste heat from replacing electricity generated from fossil fuels with electricity generated from solar.

And you have yet to explain your ridiculous claim that waste heat heats the surface of the planet like photons do.

And you have yet to explain your ridiculous claim that waste heat heats the surface of the planet like photons do.

If you want to claim that waste heat doesn't warm the planet....the Nobel Committee is listening.

 

[ding]

Moving heat from point A to point B doesn't destroy the heat. Doesn't reduce total heat.

Incorrect. Incrementally there is no change in waste heat.

How does waste heat from electricity usage heat the surface of the planet like photons do?

 

[ding]

And you have yet to explain your ridiculous claim that waste heat heats the surface of the planet like photons do.

If you want to claim that waste heat doesn't warm the planet....the Nobel Committee is listening.

How does waste heat from electricity usage heat the surface of the planet like photons do?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Advancing glaciers would be over a time period of many thousands of years., The warming we are seeing is happening over a period of decades. This is very much like the difference of bumping your car into a brick wall at 5 mph or doing the same at 100 mph. The outcome of the latter is going to be rather more serious than the former.

Advancing glaciers would be over a time period of many thousands of years.,

Or hundreds.

 

[ding]

I can’t think of a better way to usher in the next glacial cycle other than the widespread use of solar.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How does waste heat from electricity usage heat the surface of the planet like photons do?

How does it not?
Especially when you consider 7/8ths fewer photons reflected to space with the panel.

 

[ding]

On the bright side Chicago would be under a thousand feet of ice and Todd would be at the border trying to climb Mexico’s fence.

 

[ding]

How does it not?
Especially when you consider 7/8ths fewer photons reflected to space with the panel.

Walk me through how using an overhead crane heats the surface of the planet like photons do.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Incorrect. Incrementally there is no change in waste heat.

How does waste heat from electricity usage heat the surface of the planet like photons do?

Incorrect? So you think moving heat from point A to point B DOES destroy heat?
DOES reduce total heat?

Tell me more!!!!

 

[Old Rocks]

There’s no incremental change in waste heat from replacing electricity generated from fossil fuels with electricity generated from solar.

And you have yet to explain your ridiculous claim that waste heat heats the surface of the planet like photons do.

Damn, but you are a silly ass. When you burn fossil fuels, you are creating heat that the planet would not have had from the sun. You are also creating GHGs that further trap some of the sun's heat that would normally have been radiated into space. When a solar panel converts solar photons into electrons, the energy in those electrons are then used for work, which creates heat, so the overall balance of heat is not affected by solar panels at all.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I can’t think of a better way to usher in the next glacial cycle other than the widespread use of solar.

Well, I agree with your first three words.......

 

[ding]

View attachment 725964

Incorrect? So you think moving heat from point A to point B DOES destroy heat?
DOES reduce total heat?

Tell me more!!!!

There’s no change in waste heat from replacing fossil fuels with solar. It’s the same in both cases.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Walk me through how using an overhead crane heats the surface of the planet like photons do.

What percentage of the total electricity (electric crane.....LOL!) used is stored in the potential energy of the beam lifted above the ground?

 

[ding]

Damn, but you are a silly ass. When you burn fossil fuels, you are creating heat that the planet would not have had from the sun. You are also creating GHGs that further trap some of the sun's heat that would normally have been radiated into space. When a solar panel converts solar photons into electrons, the energy in those electrons are then used for work, which creates heat, so the overall balance of heat is not affected by solar panels at all.

We aren’t discussing waste heat from electricity generation. We are discussing waste heat from electricity usage. If we were discussing generation it would only strengthen my case.

Widespread use of solar is a bad idea in the middle of an ice age.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There’s no change in waste heat from replacing fossil fuels with solar. It’s the same in both cases.

Why do you keep altering your original (didn't mention fossil fuels) claim?

Is it because you can't defend the original?