Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Nonsense.CNN doesn't want her there because she interrupts their narrative. It isn't the RNC organizing this, it is CNN. Thier show, their rules. But their viewers will be yelling about it. I would imagine quite a few candidates are feeling the heat.
Correct.Anyway, you'll note that none of the GOP blow-hards here want to go to bat for Carly...they just want to pile on Hillary.
The GOP war on women continues...unabated...as always.
OREO SAID:
'SO HOW EXACTLY DOES THE REPUBLICAN PARTY PROVE TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, PRIMARILY WOMEN--that they really don't have a "War on Women"'
Simple:
Each republican candidate should acknowledge a woman's right to privacy, her right to not be compelled by the state to give birth against her will.
Each republican candidate should pledge to appoint only judges to the Federal courts – and justices to the Supreme Court – who will likewise pledge to defend a woman's right to privacy, her right to not be compelled by the state to give birth against her will.
Each republican candidate should pledge to respect the decisions women make with regard to their reproductive health and contraception; to not seek to interfere with those decisions by placing undue financial and policy burdens to accessing healthcare.
The sad fact is that this was something republicans advocated before they struck their Faustian bargain with the social right and Christian fundamentalists.
The GOP can run as many female candidate as they wish, but unless those female candidates acknowledge the privacy and reproductive rights of women, such candidacies would be futile efforts to win back the votes of women.
It's also an understanding and respecting the Constitution and its case law issue, an understanding and respecting the rule of law issue, and an understanding and respecting the civil rights of all Americans issue.OREO SAID:
'SO HOW EXACTLY DOES THE REPUBLICAN PARTY PROVE TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, PRIMARILY WOMEN--that they really don't have a "War on Women"'
Simple:
Each republican candidate should acknowledge a woman's right to privacy, her right to not be compelled by the state to give birth against her will.
Each republican candidate should pledge to appoint only judges to the Federal courts – and justices to the Supreme Court – who will likewise pledge to defend a woman's right to privacy, her right to not be compelled by the state to give birth against her will.
Each republican candidate should pledge to respect the decisions women make with regard to their reproductive health and contraception; to not seek to interfere with those decisions by placing undue financial and policy burdens to accessing healthcare.
The sad fact is that this was something republicans advocated before they struck their Faustian bargain with the social right and Christian fundamentalists.
The GOP can run as many female candidate as they wish, but unless those female candidates acknowledge the privacy and reproductive rights of women, such candidacies would be futile efforts to win back the votes of women.
Get ready for a bunch of toothless hicks saying "They don't vote with their vaginas" shit. Abortion is a gateway issue. If you don't respect a woman enough to let her make a decision, she isn't going to listen to the rest of your song and dance. Could you imagine the State forcing you to look at pictures of gunshot victims and watch a video of one dying on the operating table before buying a gun? Basically, this is what States like Ohio, Wisconsin, and Texas do to women who want to exercise their constitutional rights.
the great one Mark Levin made an obvious but solid point on the republican war on women narrative (false narrative)- ALL Republicans in DC and all over have WIFES, SISTERS, MOTHERS, daugthers etc.... its stupid to believe they are in general against women- but what do you expect from the libs- its all about DIVIDING- class, sex, race etc... its always about driving a wedge between people.
It's only a war on women because women are finally fighting back. If you guys would stop passing draconian laws limiting a woman's constitutional rights, perhaps women would give your pitiful party a second look.
That you "have women" in your lives isn't enough....just like "having black friends" isn't enough for blacks.
Next year women will be nearly 60% of the vote. Each and every day, you can find a republican here calling Hillary a "bitch". Its no coincidence that the politics of the Party they support is anti-woman in so many ways.
Princess Frebuss not going to the wall to get Carly on the stage with CNN is just another symptom.... We all know most of the men there have zero chance so what would it hurt to replace one of them with Carly? Nothing.
Sarah Palin ring a bell? YOU LIBS treat women like shit, esp. Conservative women.
Nonsense.CNN doesn't want her there because she interrupts their narrative. It isn't the RNC organizing this, it is CNN. Thier show, their rules. But their viewers will be yelling about it. I would imagine quite a few candidates are feeling the heat.
There is no 'narrative' to 'interrupt.'
And as already correctly noted: if the RNC doesn't like what CNN is doing, they can cancel the 'debate,' or individual candidate can decide not to participate.
This is more of the same unwarranted whining from the right.
OREO SAID:
'SO HOW EXACTLY DOES THE REPUBLICAN PARTY PROVE TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, PRIMARILY WOMEN--that they really don't have a "War on Women"'
Simple:
Each republican candidate should acknowledge a woman's right to privacy, her right to not be compelled by the state to give birth against her will.
Each republican candidate should pledge to appoint only judges to the Federal courts – and justices to the Supreme Court – who will likewise pledge to defend a woman's right to privacy, her right to not be compelled by the state to give birth against her will.
Each republican candidate should pledge to respect the decisions women make with regard to their reproductive health and contraception; to not seek to interfere with those decisions by placing undue financial and policy burdens to accessing healthcare.
The sad fact is that this was something republicans advocated before they struck their Faustian bargain with the social right and Christian fundamentalists.
The GOP can run as many female candidate as they wish, but unless those female candidates acknowledge the privacy and reproductive rights of women, such candidacies would be futile efforts to win back the votes of women.
Get ready for a bunch of toothless hicks saying "They don't vote with their vaginas" shit. Abortion is a gateway issue. If you don't respect a woman enough to let her make a decision, she isn't going to listen to the rest of your song and dance. Could you imagine the State forcing you to look at pictures of gunshot victims and watch a video of one dying on the operating table before buying a gun? Basically, this is what States like Ohio, Wisconsin, and Texas do to women who want to exercise their constitutional rights.
