Fire and Fury: How much is true?

[Aba Incieni]

Left wing hack attack job. They're totally on board with Sloppy Steve's so called negative remarks, but fail to include that he also claims that the Russia collusion story is a total hoax and a fraud.

What about Trump's son who was certainly a large part of the campaign? Bannon said he was treasonous and unpatriotic for meeting with the Russians in Trump Tower. He also said he probably took the Russians to Trump's office after the meeting. Sounds like collusion to me.

Sounds like you agree with those who say the book is a lie.

 

[blackhawk]

Don't know don't care but I have found one thing interesting I have heard he claims in the book Trump didn't really want to win the election or expect to but we have also heard since the election from Trumps critics he wanted to win so badly he colluded with Russia to steal the election kind of makes one wonder how both can be true.

Maybe because his collusion with Russia wasn't about "winning' so much as it was about money laundering.

Please note, the people who Mueller is surrounding himself with are specialists in that area.

Interesting how the narrative has changed from collusion to obstruction of justice to now money laundering.

 

[konradv]

Don't know don't care but I have found one thing interesting I have heard he claims in the book Trump didn't really want to win the election or expect to but we have also heard since the election from Trumps critics he wanted to win so badly he colluded with Russia to steal the election kind of makes one wonder how both can be true.

Maybe because his collusion with Russia wasn't about "winning' so much as it was about money laundering.

Please note, the people who Mueller is surrounding himself with are specialists in that area.

Interesting how the narrative has changed from collusion to obstruction of justice to now money laundering.

'Changed' or 'now including'?

 

[blackhawk]

Don't know don't care but I have found one thing interesting I have heard he claims in the book Trump didn't really want to win the election or expect to but we have also heard since the election from Trumps critics he wanted to win so badly he colluded with Russia to steal the election kind of makes one wonder how both can be true.

Maybe because his collusion with Russia wasn't about "winning' so much as it was about money laundering.

Please note, the people who Mueller is surrounding himself with are specialists in that area.

Interesting how the narrative has changed from collusion to obstruction of justice to now money laundering.

'Changed' or 'now including'?

Changed when was the last time you heard Russian interference in the election and collusion mentioned which was supposed to be the purpose of this special investigation? This has been my problem with special prosecutors dating back to Bill Clinton they are empowered to investigate one thing and end up investigating everything but that.

 

[konradv]

Don't know don't care but I have found one thing interesting I have heard he claims in the book Trump didn't really want to win the election or expect to but we have also heard since the election from Trumps critics he wanted to win so badly he colluded with Russia to steal the election kind of makes one wonder how both can be true.

Maybe because his collusion with Russia wasn't about "winning' so much as it was about money laundering.

Please note, the people who Mueller is surrounding himself with are specialists in that area.

Interesting how the narrative has changed from collusion to obstruction of justice to now money laundering.

'Changed' or 'now including'?

Changed when was the last time you heard Russian interference in the election and collusion mentioned which was supposed to be the purpose of this special investigation? This has been my problem with special prosecutors dating back to Bill Clinton they are empowered to investigate one thing and end up investigating everything but that.

Are we talking the investigation or the media? Sure, the media always turns to something new or people will stop watching/reading. That doesn't mean the investigators have tabled the question.

 

[blackhawk]

Don't know don't care but I have found one thing interesting I have heard he claims in the book Trump didn't really want to win the election or expect to but we have also heard since the election from Trumps critics he wanted to win so badly he colluded with Russia to steal the election kind of makes one wonder how both can be true.

Maybe because his collusion with Russia wasn't about "winning' so much as it was about money laundering.

Please note, the people who Mueller is surrounding himself with are specialists in that area.

Interesting how the narrative has changed from collusion to obstruction of justice to now money laundering.

'Changed' or 'now including'?

Changed when was the last time you heard Russian interference in the election and collusion mentioned which was supposed to be the purpose of this special investigation? This has been my problem with special prosecutors dating back to Bill Clinton they are empowered to investigate one thing and end up investigating everything but that.

Are we talking the investigation or the media? Sure, the media always turns to something new or people will stop watching/reading. That doesn't mean the investigators have tabled the question.

Both the investigation has handed down two indictments for Manafort and his associate for basically money laundering and tax evasion for things that they did before there ever was a Trump campaign and got two guilty pleas from Flynn and Papadopoulos for making false or misleading statements to the FBI non of which has anything to do with what is supposed to be the focus of this investigation. Maybe they are looking into Russian interference and collusion but given what we have seen so far I have my doubts.

 

[Political Junky]

Who'd vote on it if they haven't read it?

 

[OldLady]

I don't know the precise proportion, but I do know that the material points and observations are accurate.

Wolff has admitted in a couple of his interviews on all the talk shows that EVERYONE in the WH was lying to him to give him their spin on the situation. So he came to his own conclusions based on ..... whatever he felt like, apparently.
I don't trust any of it. I haven't read it and don't plan to; the man is a huckster.

 

[MarcATL]

I don't care, because nothing in the book tells me why voting for Hillary Clinton is in my best interests.

You know the election as over a year ago, right?

You know Trump has gone above and beyond my hopes and expectations for what I hoped he would deliver in his first year, right?

You have low standards, very low standards.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

[konradv]

Maybe because his collusion with Russia wasn't about "winning' so much as it was about money laundering.

Please note, the people who Mueller is surrounding himself with are specialists in that area.

Interesting how the narrative has changed from collusion to obstruction of justice to now money laundering.

'Changed' or 'now including'?

Changed when was the last time you heard Russian interference in the election and collusion mentioned which was supposed to be the purpose of this special investigation? This has been my problem with special prosecutors dating back to Bill Clinton they are empowered to investigate one thing and end up investigating everything but that.

Are we talking the investigation or the media? Sure, the media always turns to something new or people will stop watching/reading. That doesn't mean the investigators have tabled the question.

Both the investigation has handed down two indictments for Manafort and his associate for basically money laundering and tax evasion for things that they did before there ever was a Trump campaign and got two guilty pleas from Flynn and Papadopoulos for making false or misleading statements to the FBI non of which has anything to do with what is supposed to be the focus of this investigation. Maybe they are looking into Russian interference and collusion but given what we have seen so far I have my doubts.

I have my doubts they've dropped any aspect of the investigation. Lack of evidence isn't evidence.

 

[OldLady]

Who'd vote on it if they haven't read it?

Plenty of people, unfortunately. Trump supporters will call it lies and anti-Trumpers will call it true, and Wolff gets rich on a thick pile of rumors that are quite obviously vicious kitchen gossip.

 

[TNHarley]

why isnt trump suing wolf...for slander and libel....cause he cant ....that would lead me to believe much of it is true

obama should have sued his publisher..right? hehe

 

[dannyboys]

Don't know don't care but I have found one thing interesting I have heard he claims in the book Trump didn't really want to win the election or expect to but we have also heard since the election from Trumps critics he wanted to win so badly he colluded with Russia to steal the election kind of makes one wonder how both can be true.

Maybe because his collusion with Russia wasn't about "winning' so much as it was about money laundering.

Please note, the people who Mueller is surrounding himself with are specialists in that area.

Interesting how the narrative has changed from collusion to obstruction of justice to now money laundering.

'Changed' or 'now including'?

Don't forget the latest: Trump is crazy and should be removed ASAP!
The ONLY real reason the libs are so desperate to get rid of President Trump is because they don't want him to get a chance to put another one or two REP SC justices on the bench. The LIBs don't give a shit about the boring day-to-day bullshit going on in the Gov.
And they certainly don't give a shit about all the 'deplorables' in fly-over country.
They've proven that numerous times.
Hillary couldn't even be bothered campaigning in Wisconsin.

 

[dannyboys]

If someone wrote a book trashing Obama and the author got one fucking word wrong the entire LIB MSM would denounce the book as garbage.
This fag will NEVER get ANYONE to talk to him again on background. NO ONE! Not even a fucking LIB!
He better get busy spending his new money.
He doesn't look very healthy.
It was Bannon who let the fag into the White House and it is Bannon who is the source for the leaks to the LIB MSM.
He doesn't look very healthy either.

 

[blackhawk]

Interesting how the narrative has changed from collusion to obstruction of justice to now money laundering.

'Changed' or 'now including'?

Changed when was the last time you heard Russian interference in the election and collusion mentioned which was supposed to be the purpose of this special investigation? This has been my problem with special prosecutors dating back to Bill Clinton they are empowered to investigate one thing and end up investigating everything but that.

Are we talking the investigation or the media? Sure, the media always turns to something new or people will stop watching/reading. That doesn't mean the investigators have tabled the question.

Both the investigation has handed down two indictments for Manafort and his associate for basically money laundering and tax evasion for things that they did before there ever was a Trump campaign and got two guilty pleas from Flynn and Papadopoulos for making false or misleading statements to the FBI non of which has anything to do with what is supposed to be the focus of this investigation. Maybe they are looking into Russian interference and collusion but given what we have seen so far I have my doubts.

I have my doubts they've dropped any aspect of the investigation. Lack of evidence isn't evidence.

We all have our opinions but so far this investigation has not produced anything on what it was empowered to investigate maybe it will maybe it won’t we will see.

 

[OldLady]

Last night on Colbert, Wolff said he will not be releasing the tapes of his interviews that he earlier said will back up his words.

Sound familiar? The guy is as big a bullshitter as the President.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

‘Fire And Fury’ Author Reveals Kellyanne Conway And Sean Spicer Arranged White House Interviews

"This was not a secret. Everybody was told to speak to me. ... Bannon told people to cooperate. Sean Spicer told people to cooperate. Kellyanne Conway told people to cooperate."…
........................................................................................................................................
Former Trump adviser Sebastian Gorka on Monday published an editorial in The Hill in which he tried to discredit Michael Wolff, the author of the bestselling book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House. However, Gorka seems to have inadvertently undermined President Donald Trump’s claim that Wolff was not given wide access to the White House to report on his book.

“When I met Michael Wolff in Reince Priebus’ office, where he was waiting to talk to Steve Bannon, and after I had been told to also speak to him for his book, my attitude was polite but firm: ‘Thanks but no thanks,'” writes Gorka. “Our brief encounter reinforced my gut feeling that this oleaginous scribe had no interest in being fair and unbiased.”

This statement contradicts Trump’s insistence last week that he “authorized Zero access to White House (actually turned him down many times) for author of phony book.” After all, if Trump had turned down Wolff’s request to report from the White House multiple times, why would Gorka have been instructed to talk with Wolff — and why would Wolff have been allowed to hang out in former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus’ office?

 

[rightwinger]

Lets settle this...

Lets have Wolff take a lie detector test
Then give one to Trump

We will see who is telling the truth

 

[Baz Ares]

I don't know the precise proportion, but I do know that the material points and observations are accurate.

Did he tell us who in the Great Douche House is running somethang like "Operation Gemstone" and "Operation Sandwedge" aka. Is the ......'Plumber'?

 

[Roudy]

Left wing hack attack job. They're totally on board with Sloppy Steve's so called negative remarks, but fail to include that he also claims that the Russia collusion story is a total hoax and a fraud.

What about Trump's son who was certainly a large part of the campaign? Bannon said he was treasonous and unpatriotic for meeting with the Russians in Trump Tower. He also said he probably took the Russians to Trump's office after the meeting. Sounds like collusion to me.

Bannon said the Russia collusion thing is a hoax. And he backtracked his comments about Don Jr, saying that Maniford should not have allowed it to happen. You guys really need to keep up.