Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually go back even further. The details were initially negotiated by Republican John Katko, and would have consisted of an equal number of Democrats and Republicans.There is ONLY one side of the story.
And what you are saying is a lie.
Republicans were invited to serve on the committee but Kevin McCarty only wanted to volunteer Trump co conspirators/co-criminals to serve.
This would have tainted the legitimacy of the Committee.
So you get what you get and you don't throw a fit.
No weapons, no leader, no insurrection. Simple. The law is clear and just because you and the leftists want to glom onto a term that you cannot define correctly doesn't change that.And it was a failed insurrection.
I’m not a fuckin’ library’sNo. I’m not a fuckin’ library’s or cultist. Unlike you, I deal in facts and reasons and honesty.
There is no excuse for you.
And no credibility for you traitors who try to justify that failed insurrection.No weapons, no leader, no insurrection. Simple. The law is clear and just because you and the leftists want to glom onto a term that you cannot define correctly doesn't change that.
All conclusions from The FBI and other agencies were posted here many times this year and last yearHave you got a link to these "federal investigative authorities saying this was not an insurrection?"
And btw....since you at least give credibility to "federal investigative authorities" federal investigative authorities are investigating Trump's theft of top secret documents after he left office.
I can only assume, based on what you have said here that you are fully behind that investigation.
Right?
And also, federal investigative authorities (The House January 6th Committee) are also investigating the January 6th INSURRECTION and failed coup.
Given your deep respect for federal investigative authorities what is your take on the mountain of EVIDENCE this committee already has on Trump for his role in this insurgency?
Read the indictments, and more importantly the allocutions. People confessed to bringing arms, they confessed to leading organized groups, and they confessed to the insurrection.No weapons, no leader, no insurrection. Simple. The law is clear and just because you and the leftists want to glom onto a term that you cannot define correctly doesn't change that.
And all the things the unconcerned american claimed didn't happen, were confessed to in open court, by the people who committed the very acts they deny happened.And no credibility for you traitors who try to justify that failed insurrection.
Actually since you know it's not the FBI's call what people get charged with.All conclusions from The FBI and other agencies were posted here many times this year and last year
What you libs are doing is trying to hand out Homework Assignments to send us scurrying to collect what has already been provided
As a good libbie you want others to do your work for you but I won’t.
Some people went down there to peacefully voice their beliefs. After a while another batch was let into the Capitol and at the end the Pelosi plants arrived and started the ruckus.And all the things the unconcerned american claimed didn't happen, were confessed to in open court, by the people who committed the very acts they deny happened.
Cry me a river. The fact remains, there was no insurrection. A three hour unorganized, unarmed riot is not insurrection by any accepted definition.And no credibility for you traitors who try to justify that failed insurrection.
It’s already in posts before this one what the FBI director declared and it wasn’t insurrectionActually since you know it's not the FBI's call what people get charged with.
And to paraphrase Big Bang Theory.
The FBI didn't call it an insurrection, they also didn't call it a suspension bridge.
[
Plus their was no demonstrable evidence of Any ability to take control of any function of government. Libs are rolling with what libs Feel the intent of the people was.Cry me a river. The fact remains, there was no insurrection. A three hour unorganized, unarmed riot is not insurrection by any accepted definition.
Damn good point.....How can people trespass on a property that is theirs?
Accepted by you crazy MAGAs?Cry me a river. The fact remains, there was no insurrection. A three hour unorganized, unarmed riot is not insurrection by any accepted definition.
Going by the arrest records, 99% of BLM protesters were perfectly peacefulSome people went down there to peacefully voice their beliefs.
Wrong.There is ONLY one side of the story.
Wrong again. Your side is the lie. You wallow in lies.And what you are saying is a lie.
False. The sickening and incoherent Mumbler of the House rejected the Republican choices. That’s a fact and you remain a liar.Republicans were invited to serve on the committee but Kevin McCarty only wanted to volunteer
Another lie. There were no co-conspirators since there were no conspirators, at all.Trump co conspirators/co-criminals to serve.
Pelousy already undermined any such “legitimacy.” There is nothing legitimate about it.This would have tainted the legitimacy of the Committee.
That makes no sense. What we got is an entirely biased clown show from Pelousy and the other scumbags of the DNC. Plus, I’m not throwing a fit. Calling bullshit on idiots like you is a very different thing, you idiot.So you get what you get and you don't throw a fit.
Not even remotely. They are biased and bullshit artist liars, like you.At least Cheney and Kinzinger are HONEST Repunlicans,
It isn’t rare on my side of the fence. It is in Democrap land.which is kinda rare.
Really? Cool. It’s not true, of course, but it’s an interesting delusion.Also, anybody is welcome to testify....under oath....to present "their side" to the committee.
Did you realize that you have a certain no way with words? The “other side” has only one thing to say: “don’t blame us for the behavior of a relative handful of protestors.” End of story. But if you want to try to saddle us (meaning Donald Trump) as somehow culpable for the behavior of others, you need actual evidence of that which you’ve never had.The problem with that seems to be that no one from the "other side" seems to have any other "side" to present.
Why the fuck would he or any person in his position assist the jackals in their efforts to malign himself? Yiure unbelievably stupid.Including Trump.
Zzz. I don’t believe that even you’re stupid enough to believe that horseshit. You idiot LI tards have repeatedly advised us that it was Republican witnesses who have provided allegedly damaging testimony. So obviously, they couldn’t have taken the 5th or refused subpoenas. Why must you always lie?All they want to do is either defy lawful subpoenas or, when they do show up, plead the 5th.
He did suggest as much. He was obviously wrong. And he has since come to even state that he was wrong. Only a complete asshole, such as you, would make that argument now. You complete assume.And like Trump himself was fond of saying, that means GUILT!
I haven’t whined. I’m not the snowflake. But you remain a liar and a whiner.So there you have it so quit yer whining snowflake.
You don't accept Merriam-Webster or the Oxford Cambridge dictionary definitions? You sound like a typical uneducated democrat.Accepted by you crazy MAGAs?
Those that started the ruckus confessed (allocuted) in open court. So your claim is beyond idiotic fiction.After a while another batch was let into the Capitol and at the end the Pelosi plants arrived and started the ruckus.
Fact 101
Except in the case of Hillary, the AG delegated the authority to the FBI which admitted she committed the crimes she was accused of, but refused to prosecute. That’s all on the public record. I can’t remember any LEO ever saying before that a guilty party shouldn’t be prosecuted.Constitution Check: Does the FBI have power to decide who gets prosecuted? | Constitution Center
Lyle Denniston, the National Constitution Center’s constitutional literacy adviser, looks at the FBI and Attorney General’s role in deciding to press charges in high-profile cases, which can suddenly gain a lot of visibility when a criminal investigation is aimed at a prominent political figure.constitutioncenter.org
But the public may not always understand that the FBI does not have the job of deciding who should, or should not, be prosecuted for crime. It was created to do investigations – period. When it finishes one of its probes, it can and usually does make recommendations, but someone else has the job of deciding what to do with the results of those investigations – an actual prosecutor.
They deny loaded firearms were brought to the capitol. An important part of any insurrection.Accepted by you crazy MAGAs?
