Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude...the fucking Syrian government is even announcing they had heavy damage INSIDE THE HANGARS and planes were destroyed. Fucking give it up and quit looking like a douche bag.
Let's also remember this is not satellite data, this is from a UAV, and it takes our own UAV pilots hundreds of hours training on deciphering what UAV images are showing alone. It's hard enough to differentiate an APC from a car on UAV imaging, and takes many many hours of training. Which non of us has...what do you think you're seeing? You're inserting what you want to see.
Mate, what the hell are you talking about? We can clearly see aircraft and craters, and the two are far apart.
I'm not buying this Russian Pallywood movie
This type of footage is almost impossible to successfully edit, much less in 12 hours. I know you don't like it, but this is real.
...whose to say this isn't previous UAV footage of this airbase...which Russia would definitely have. What does Russia gain from releasing this video? Either trump is a Russian colluder/puppet, or he isn't... and if he's proved he isn't, shouldn't you be at least a little relieved Russia isn't pulling our presidents strings despite whatever success you think this attack had.
And the way I've seen this attach from the beginning is a shot to the bow, drawing a hardline. And trump was probably pretty motivated to do it to make obama look bad with his "red line" statement then inaction. And trump kind of succeeded in that. I personally don't like us being in the business of toppling regimes, but you have to admit, this does make obama look bad.
Really? Who here really knows if those images are redacted or not? Certainly not the gasbags that pretend to know everything.Having no facts, not part of the Presidents team, not being in Syria, not knowing anything, gasbags show their mind set.
Don't take my word for it. Watch the drone footage and satelite images. Old Yeller was kind enough to share one corroborating that not a single missile hit the airfield or aircraft shelters.
Let's also remember this is not satellite data, this is from a UAV, and it takes our own UAV pilots hundreds of hours training on deciphering what UAV images are showing alone. It's hard enough to differentiate an APC from a car on UAV imaging, and takes many many hours of training. Which non of us has...what do you think you're seeing? You're inserting what you want to see.
Mate, what the hell are you talking about? We can clearly see aircraft and craters, and the two are far apart.
I personally didn't see any craters, because it's UAV footage. Grainy, and in infrared...If you want to point out the time in the video when it comes up go ahed, and I'll take a look. But there was clearly damage to the bunkers in the photos...bunkers being the operative word. Bunkers designed to take a hit from conventional warheads. If we were looking to flatten this airbase, we would've used bunker busters...we didn't use those. That tells me, this was to function more as a warning shot.
Really? Who here really knows if those images are redacted or not? Certainly not the gasbags that pretend to know everything.Having no facts, not part of the Presidents team, not being in Syria, not knowing anything, gasbags show their mind set.
Don't take my word for it. Watch the drone footage and satelite images. Old Yeller was kind enough to share one corroborating that not a single missile hit the airfield or aircraft shelters.
I'm not buying this Russian Pallywood movie
This type of footage is almost impossible to successfully edit, much less in 12 hours. I know you don't like it, but this is real.
...whose to say this isn't previous UAV footage of this airbase...which Russia would definitely have. What does Russia gain from releasing this video? Either trump is a Russian colluder/puppet, or he isn't... and if he's proved he isn't, shouldn't you be at least a little relieved Russia isn't pulling our presidents strings despite whatever success you think this attack had.
And the way I've seen this attach from the beginning is a shot to the bow, drawing a hardline. And trump was probably pretty motivated to do it to make obama look bad with his "red line" statement then inaction. And trump kind of succeeded in that. I personally don't like us being in the business of toppling regimes, but you have to admit, this does make obama look bad.
Since when has Obama looked good in any singular negotiation or deal with anyone in The Middle East?
This guy was a Muslim Manchurian Candidate and completely turned the Middle East in to a Jihadist Paradise.
This is Russian footage of the attack, but it shows no aircraft destroyed and none of the hardened aircraft shelters hit. They also claim it proves that only 23 of the missiles hit near the base. If that is the case, then either the attack had terrible execution, or it was intentionally designed not to destroy a single target.
Why is the pentagon taking such a long time to publicly release its own satelite imagery? It was a publicity stunt of course. It cost 100 million dollars and almost 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal, and did literally nothing. They are not showing proof of damage, because there was none
Got any proof of that? Nope? didn't think so.Why did Russia report 6 aircraft were destroyed? Why did before and after satellite images show the base flattened? Why are you showing RT photos? We've released plenty.
WTF are you talking about? This is real military drone footage. No aircraft were destroyed. There was one report of several Mig-23 damaged (1.8 million each), but nothing officially corroborated by the Kremlin or Syrian government. Not a single satellite image shows any craters in the runway or hardened aircraft shelters, just like the drone footage shows.
This was a 100 million dollar waste of time and resources. The video and satellite images prove it.
Dude...the fucking Syrian government is even announcing they had heavy damage INSIDE THE HANGARS and planes were destroyed. Fucking give it up and quit looking like a douche bag.
Back it up. All I heard was that several Mig-23 aircraft (1.8 million) under repair got damaged and many of the transport and fuel facilities were hit. Children were killed. The runway and aircraft shelters are intact.
Sounds like a good waste of 100 million dollars.
This picture looks like precision strikes all around. Does not agree with above video?
View attachment 120803
Not a single crater on the airfield or aircraft shelters. That absolutely agrees with the video.
It looks like they spent 100 million dollars to do about 2 million in damage. Video evidence showing all the aircraft intact. No strikes even remotely close to them.
All he knows is what the media has fed him, like all the rest of us. This administration is keeping their cards close.This picture looks like precision strikes all around. Does not agree with above video?
View attachment 120803
Not a single crater on the airfield or aircraft shelters. That absolutely agrees with the video.
It looks like they spent 100 million dollars to do about 2 million in damage. Video evidence showing all the aircraft intact. No strikes even remotely close to them.
I can't argue with you. I think I am wrong. That picture I found has a lot of "black areas" around the area. I thought many were blow up spots. But those spots could be trees? Yes, I am at times........jumping to conclusions. I thought it was super precise strikes. I don't think so as I look again and again. Onyx is not all wrong.
You are a Phucking Troll Sucking ISIS Cock and Bending over to get your Ass Reamed by Stalin Every Day while you Fap on to pictures of Mao and Pol Pot. I bet you have a stained centerfold of Hitler hidden under your pillow.Lots of Russians and Jihadists on the Forum today Propagandizing for Assad.
Just watch the video. That is not edited. It shows that not a single aircraft was destroyed, or even targeted.
I was suspicious when the pentagon didn't release any video evidence. Now I know why.
This is Russian footage of the attack, but it shows no aircraft destroyed and none of the hardened aircraft shelters hit. They also claim it proves that only 23 of the missiles hit near the base. If that is the case, then either the attack had terrible execution, or it was intentionally designed not to destroy a single target.
Why is the pentagon taking such a long time to publicly release its own satelite imagery? It was a publicity stunt of course. It cost 100 million dollars and almost 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal, and did literally nothing. They are not showing proof of damage, because there was none
