First they complained about the makeup of the commission.........

Of for God's sake, the committee is headed by a woman who has already determined Trump is guilty.
 
McCarthy proposed members who were potential witnesses and compromised

There were 212 other Republican Congress members available to serve. McCarthy forbid them to serve on the panel.
So what? Liz Cheney has already said Trump is guilty.
 
Well you don't exactly have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out do you?
Hint....
He has NO defense.
I think you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that this committee is nothing but political propaganda aimed at damaging Trump or even getting him disqualified from running. Their latest liar, hearsay, witness (Hutchinson) is a good example.
 
I think you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that this committee is nothing but political propaganda aimed at damaging Trump or even getting him disqualified from running. Their latest liar, hearsay, witness (Hutchinson) is a good example.
Really?
What (specifically) are you accusing her of lying about?
 
Hutchinson, darling of the TDSers now, previously said this:

"Exclusive: In Private, Cassidy Hutchinson Joked About Riot, Called J6 Committee ‘Phony,’ Praised Trump Before Changing Story"​


"Yet in a series of private communications from December 2020 through May 2021, shared exclusively with The Federalist, Hutchinson commiserated with other targets of the probe about how little information she had about any wrongdoing that day, and lamented how corrupt the politicized committee was. Far from being upset with Trump, Hutchinson repeatedly spoke in favor of him and his presidency."
 
Really?
What (specifically) are you accusing her of lying about?
She claimed Trump tried to hijack the limo, the SS said he didn't. She lied about that and, she said Trump knew the protestors had weapons, which they did not. See my post #368.
 
I think you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that this committee is nothing but political propaganda aimed at damaging Trump or even getting him disqualified from running. Their latest liar, hearsay, witness (Hutchinson) is a good example.
Are you calling the facts of what happened that day as related in sworn testimony by witnesses political propaganda?"
Is this because the facts do not make Donald Trump and many Republican members of Congress look very good?
That may be the case but it doesn't make the facts "propaganda."
If the facts "damage" your cult leader maybe you ought to reexamine your cult.
Just sayin.
 
Are you calling the facts of what happened that day as related in sworn testimony by witnesses political propaganda?"
Is this because the facts do not make Donald Trump and many Republican members of Congress look very good?
That may be the case but it doesn't make the facts "propaganda."
If the facts "damage" your cult leader maybe you ought to reexamine your cult.
Just sayin.
The facts of what happened that day are that the protestors were mosty peaceful and one unarmed woman got shot to death by Capitol police. The testimony is all hearsay and there is no cross examination. Their star witness account of the limo incident was shot down by actual witnesses. Those are the facts.
 
The facts of what happened that day are that the protestors were mosty peaceful and one unarmed woman got shot to death by Capitol police. The testimony is all hearsay and there is no cross examination. Their star witness account of the limo incident was shot down by actual witnesses. Those are the facts.
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
The facts of what happened that day are that the protestors were mosty peaceful and one unarmed woman got shot to death by Capitol police. The testimony is all hearsay and there is no cross examination. Their star witness account of the limo incident was shot down by actual witnesses. Those are the facts.
Nope.
You are operating with what the Trump Administration. referred to as "alternative facts."
The peaceful protesters that day have never been an issue.
Only the violent ones that Trump sent to The Capitol.
Ashley Babbitt got shot to death by Capitol Police after she illegally broke into The Capitol Building by Capitol Police who believed she posed a lethal threat to them.
I don't know who told you that if sworn testimony doesn't have cross examination it is just "heresay" but that is not the case.
The reality is that the "heresay" is what you hear coming from anybody disagreeing with or trying to refute sworn testimony without being sworn in themselves.
And finally, nobody "shot down" any witness testimony.
Quite the contrary.
All Huchinson said (under oath) was that somebody told her the incident happened.
So far no one has given sworn testimony saying that no, nobody told her that.
And it's not going to happen either.

So maybe you can do a little research and educate yourself on what exactly a fact actually is....before you make a fool of yourself again?
 
The facts of what happened that day are that the protestors were mosty peaceful and one unarmed woman got shot to death by Capitol police. The testimony is all hearsay and there is no cross examination. Their star witness account of the limo incident was shot down by actual witnesses. Those are the facts.
 

So, you have a video of Trump-supporter impersonators in the front fighting with the cops. One of their leaders, Roy Epps urged them on. BFD. Tell us why Pelosi, Bowser, Capitol security, etc. were not prepared. Oh, that's right, there are no committee witnesses calling any of those people and asking THEM to 'testify' why security was so lax.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top