bucs90
Gold Member
- Feb 25, 2010
- 26,545
- 6,028
- 280
- Thread starter
- #21
In WW2 there was a relatively short period of basic training to prepare soldiers for the field. But think how much war has changed from WW2 until now. Today's soldiers have to not only learn battle skills, they must work with complex electronic and communication systems. The time it takes to go from a new recruit to a qualified soldier takes much, much more time due to the technology involved. If highly skilled soldiers can just quit and walk off the field when they feel like it the effectiveness of the unit can be completely compromised. The idea of a citizen soldier putting down his shovel to go and fight when they feel like it is not practical in today's complex world.Your idea for a volunteer military would just not work. Troops being able to walk away at will would quickly reduce the military to an uncontrollable rabble. Neither would a conscripted military work. We saw how the blow back in Vietnam forced the US to end the war. The only reason we left Vietnam is because of the marches and protests by the people.
The following is just speculation on my part and may be completely in error. I believe the military/industrial complex (MIC) controls many in Congress. Most, but not all, are on the republican side of the aisle. The MIC also knows what I posted above about volunteerism and conscription working against their interests. What the MIC wants is a steady stream of people who are forced to join the military for financial reasons. This occurs when there are few jobs outside of the military and when wages are kept low. This is exactly what the gop is working for. They do not want a jobs bill and they do not want a higher minimum wage. Who benefits from this situation? Clearly it is the MIC because when this happens people join the military of necessity due to the fact that there are no other choices available.
If the troops could say no, we never would've had a Vietnam War. Or it would've been much shorter.
I agree with the 2nd half of your post.
That's true, but its also true for many jobs in many lines of work.
How much power to military officers really have? For example, lets say in 2024, a hypothetical independent President John Doe took power, and the Independent Party took Congress, and all just voted to invade and conquer Canada and Mexico, for no good reason. Instant war on our neighbors.
If the military officers all said no, what happens? This is sort of tied to the gun debate. Because if a national confiscation ever was ordered, the military would have to do it. There aren't enough cops to do it even if all agreed to, and I guarantee 98% of cops would say fuck off, they wouldn't do it.
What if the military said no also?