Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL, you also might try responding to what I said, or do you believe that you are Zeus and everyone has to listen to you?Should you have the right to post off topic then ban someone for answering your off topic post, if your babbles meant anything you would ban yourself.You break the rules for not posting on topic all the time old man, so ban yourselfNope, not free. There's a graveyard of posters who've been permanently banned.Speech is quite free here in USMB. It should shine as an example to the other idiots out there (Political Jack, Political Hotwire, etc)
This forum is a perfect example of a PLATFORM. It does NOT censor speech, with the infrequent exception of when one calls for another to be murdered or for posting something pornographic, etc. Users here CAN and DO criticize masks, vaccines, etc.
And why were they permanently banned? For repeatedly breaking clearly stated rules?
I have posted off topic, that much is true. But it was always in response to your comments. So if I wanted to be that strict about people posting off topic, I would ban you the first time you did it, instead of responding to it.
Try actually responding to what I said.
Ain't it a great bill?Restricting freedom of speech is exactly what this bill does.So you want freedom of speech restricted.
Great huh, I can't wait until they break up Alphabet into more stocks for meIt limits the speech of Facebook and Twitter who are required to publish speech they don’t want to.This bill does not limit speech, it allows for more speech. Something that irritates you.No really. I’m against bills that limit freedom of speech. Why do you support limiting freedom of speech? Not a fan of the constitution?Ain't it a great bill?
The freedom of speech also means the freedom not to speak.
LOL, you also might try responding to what I said, or do you believe that you are Zeus and everyone has to listen to you?Should you have the right to post off topic then ban someone for answering your off topic post, if your babbles meant anything you would ban yourself.You break the rules for not posting on topic all the time old man, so ban yourselfNope, not free. There's a graveyard of posters who've been permanently banned.Speech is quite free here in USMB. It should shine as an example to the other idiots out there (Political Jack, Political Hotwire, etc)
This forum is a perfect example of a PLATFORM. It does NOT censor speech, with the infrequent exception of when one calls for another to be murdered or for posting something pornographic, etc. Users here CAN and DO criticize masks, vaccines, etc.
And why were they permanently banned? For repeatedly breaking clearly stated rules?
I have posted off topic, that much is true. But it was always in response to your comments. So if I wanted to be that strict about people posting off topic, I would ban you the first time you did it, instead of responding to it.
Try actually responding to what I said.
Should you have the right to post off topic then ban someone for answering your off topic post, if your babbles meant anything you would ban yourself.
Of course it’s a publisher. That’s not a question. They’ve always been publishers.It sure is. The government is assigning fines if they don’t publish elected officials and subjecting them to civil liability for not publishing.ocial media has a constitutional right to not publish. That is not being barred.
This bill has nothing to do with slander and libel.
It's not barring their right to NOT publish. They are not publishers, right? It is barring the "right" to stop users from publishing on the platform.
Unless you are admitting that social media is NOT a platform, but a publisher. That's what it looks like here.
I see you do favor limiting speech the since you see this as “great”Great huh, I can't wait until they break up Alphabet into more stocks for me
Nothing new there as the government already restricts what you can say. Try posting military plans here, or the video of Hunter Biden jerking off his own cock on the White House web pageAin't it a great bill?Restricting freedom of speech is exactly what this bill does.So you want freedom of speech restricted.
No, it isn't. It tries to meddle in the affairs of a private entity.
I am free to respond to what you write without reading. So my comprehending what you write by skimming the first words is quite impossible. But I do want you to have purposeLOL, you also might try responding to what I said, or do you believe that you are Zeus and everyone has to listen to you?Should you have the right to post off topic then ban someone for answering your off topic post, if your babbles meant anything you would ban yourself.You break the rules for not posting on topic all the time old man, so ban yourselfNope, not free. There's a graveyard of posters who've been permanently banned.Speech is quite free here in USMB. It should shine as an example to the other idiots out there (Political Jack, Political Hotwire, etc)
This forum is a perfect example of a PLATFORM. It does NOT censor speech, with the infrequent exception of when one calls for another to be murdered or for posting something pornographic, etc. Users here CAN and DO criticize masks, vaccines, etc.
And why were they permanently banned? For repeatedly breaking clearly stated rules?
I have posted off topic, that much is true. But it was always in response to your comments. So if I wanted to be that strict about people posting off topic, I would ban you the first time you did it, instead of responding to it.
Try actually responding to what I said.
Should you have the right to post off topic then ban someone for answering your off topic post, if your babbles meant anything you would ban yourself.
Let me repost what I said so maybe you can understand.
"So if I wanted to be that strict about people posting off topic, I would ban you the first time you did it, instead of responding to it."
Nothing new there as the government already restricts what you can say. Try posting military plans here, or the video of Hunter Biden jerking off his own cock on the White House web pageAin't it a great bill?Restricting freedom of speech is exactly what this bill does.So you want freedom of speech restricted.
No, it isn't. It tries to meddle in the affairs of a private entity.
What if a user is censored despite not having broken the TOS?
The federal law does not protect publishers. Sorry.They’ve always published content. The federal law says they don’t take on the liability of being a publisher. I know it’s confusing but that’s the truth.also we will see if the Courts say that the federal law doesn’t protect facebook and tweeter since they are in violation of it now that they are publishing content
State law can’t undo federal law.
This law doesn’t even attempt it. The damages come from Twitter and Facebook removing content. It lets people sue for damages incurred by not being able to use their service.
No, the law states they shouldn't be treated as the publishersNo. It protects publishers. If they weren’t moderating content, they’d have no need for protection in the first place.Section 230 protects “bulletin boards” - not publishers. We shall see when this law is litigated if the courts find facebook and tweeter has moved beyond their immunity protections
Jesus, people really don’t understand this issue.
I am free to respond to what you write without reading. So my comprehending what you write by skimming the first words is quite impossible. But I do want you to have purposeLOL, you also might try responding to what I said, or do you believe that you are Zeus and everyone has to listen to you?Should you have the right to post off topic then ban someone for answering your off topic post, if your babbles meant anything you would ban yourself.You break the rules for not posting on topic all the time old man, so ban yourselfNope, not free. There's a graveyard of posters who've been permanently banned.Speech is quite free here in USMB. It should shine as an example to the other idiots out there (Political Jack, Political Hotwire, etc)
This forum is a perfect example of a PLATFORM. It does NOT censor speech, with the infrequent exception of when one calls for another to be murdered or for posting something pornographic, etc. Users here CAN and DO criticize masks, vaccines, etc.
And why were they permanently banned? For repeatedly breaking clearly stated rules?
I have posted off topic, that much is true. But it was always in response to your comments. So if I wanted to be that strict about people posting off topic, I would ban you the first time you did it, instead of responding to it.
Try actually responding to what I said.
Should you have the right to post off topic then ban someone for answering your off topic post, if your babbles meant anything you would ban yourself.
Let me repost what I said so maybe you can understand.
"So if I wanted to be that strict about people posting off topic, I would ban you the first time you did it, instead of responding to it."
Section 230 protects "providers" from liability for the content provided by "content providers." It also provides a civil liability protection for action taken "in good faith" to remove "obscene" content.No. It protects publishers. If they weren’t moderating content, they’d have no need for protection in the first place.Section 230 protects “bulletin boards” - not publishers. We shall see when this law is litigated if the courts find facebook and tweeter has moved beyond their immunity protections
Jesus, people really don’t understand this issue.
in a 1776 document, they referred to 'big tech'?....amazingTheir laws still are bounded by the constitution. This law violates it.hey can change THEIR laws to protect THEIR citizens from the likes of the scum demonRAT assholes...
And it says in the constitution that you can't sue big tech?
When constitutional rights allow for idiots to get elected and rewrite the constitution then the constitution is a farce.Nothing new there as the government already restricts what you can say. Try posting military plans here, or the video of Hunter Biden jerking off his own cock on the White House web pageAin't it a great bill?Restricting freedom of speech is exactly what this bill does.So you want freedom of speech restricted.
No, it isn't. It tries to meddle in the affairs of a private entity.
So you agree with limitations or regulations on constitutional rights?
Let me ask you a simple question. If they aren’t publishers, why do they need protection at all?The federal law does not protect publishers. Sorry.
Then, they are not an interactive computer service, and therefore are not entitled to protection. They are information content providers.Of course it’s a publisher. That’s not a question. They’ve always been publishers.It sure is. The government is assigning fines if they don’t publish elected officials and subjecting them to civil liability for not publishing.ocial media has a constitutional right to not publish. That is not being barred.
This bill has nothing to do with slander and libel.
It's not barring their right to NOT publish. They are not publishers, right? It is barring the "right" to stop users from publishing on the platform.
Unless you are admitting that social media is NOT a platform, but a publisher. That's what it looks like here.
Someone “publishing” on their platform means that they’re publishers.
Reality is that one of my Cannabis stocks and Alphabet gained 3 percent yesterday. So what is your realityI am free to respond to what you write without reading. So my comprehending what you write by skimming the first words is quite impossible. But I do want you to have purposeLOL, you also might try responding to what I said, or do you believe that you are Zeus and everyone has to listen to you?Should you have the right to post off topic then ban someone for answering your off topic post, if your babbles meant anything you would ban yourself.You break the rules for not posting on topic all the time old man, so ban yourselfNope, not free. There's a graveyard of posters who've been permanently banned.Speech is quite free here in USMB. It should shine as an example to the other idiots out there (Political Jack, Political Hotwire, etc)
This forum is a perfect example of a PLATFORM. It does NOT censor speech, with the infrequent exception of when one calls for another to be murdered or for posting something pornographic, etc. Users here CAN and DO criticize masks, vaccines, etc.
And why were they permanently banned? For repeatedly breaking clearly stated rules?
I have posted off topic, that much is true. But it was always in response to your comments. So if I wanted to be that strict about people posting off topic, I would ban you the first time you did it, instead of responding to it.
Try actually responding to what I said.
Should you have the right to post off topic then ban someone for answering your off topic post, if your babbles meant anything you would ban yourself.
Let me repost what I said so maybe you can understand.
"So if I wanted to be that strict about people posting off topic, I would ban you the first time you did it, instead of responding to it."
Indeed you are free to respond to what I write without reading it. I am just kind enough to try to lead you back to reality.
When constitutional rights allow for idiots to get elected and rewrite the constitution then the constitution is a farce.Nothing new there as the government already restricts what you can say. Try posting military plans here, or the video of Hunter Biden jerking off his own cock on the White House web pageAin't it a great bill?Restricting freedom of speech is exactly what this bill does.So you want freedom of speech restricted.
No, it isn't. It tries to meddle in the affairs of a private entity.
So you agree with limitations or regulations on constitutional rights?
See you actually have no rights, you never did or do. This is what the people of color figured out and they are technically correct
