Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Technically they’re both at different times.So, Facebook is not an "Interactive Computer Service" but an "Information Content Provider" for purposes of Section 230?
You can and always have been able to sue Twitter for the content of that specific box. Twitter wrote that language, published it. They developed it.Spin that.
So, they get to meander back and forth from Computer Service to Content Provider whenever it suits them?Technically they’re both at different times.So, Facebook is not an "Interactive Computer Service" but an "Information Content Provider" for purposes of Section 230?
When they publish your post, their an interactive computer service. When they publish their own content, they’re an information content provider.
It is important to note that this distinction does not mean that suppressing speech is not suppression of speech though. Lefties are always quick to point out that it is legal for the private sector to suppress speech, but they never want to accept that suppressing speech is the same thing, regardless of if the government does it or if the private sector does it, or if the private sector does it on behalf of the government. When lefties point out that the private sector can legally suppress speech, it is almost always a strawman argument .The 1st amendment protects your freedom of speech from the gov't. It does not have any effect on what happens on private property.
It is important to note that this distinction does not mean that suppressing speech is not suppression of speech though. Lefties are always quick to point out that it is legal for the private sector to suppress speech, but they never want to accept that suppressing speech is the same thing, regardless of if the government does it or if the private sector does it, or if the private sector does it on behalf of the government. When lefties point out that the private sector can legally suppress speech, it is almost always a strawman argument .The 1st amendment protects your freedom of speech from the gov't. It does not have any effect on what happens on private property.
The number of amendments is not the issue, as freedom of speech has already been restricted so the first amendment already has no meaning, neither does the second amendment. The problem is fools like you that can not comprehend reality but that just choose to believe in childish words written on paper that have no meaning.Amazon product ASIN 1933995068When constitutional rights allow for idiots to get elected and rewrite the constitution then the constitution is a farce.Nothing new there as the government already restricts what you can say. Try posting military plans here, or the video of Hunter Biden jerking off his own cock on the White House web pageAin't it a great bill?Restricting freedom of speech is exactly what this bill does.So you want freedom of speech restricted.
No, it isn't. It tries to meddle in the affairs of a private entity.
So you agree with limitations or regulations on constitutional rights?
See you actually have no rights, you never did or do. This is what the people of color figured out and they are technically correct
So you think an individual can rewrite the US Constitution?
Actually I know that changes to the constitution happen too frequently and that they are called amendments, and that an amendment saying that no internet post can be made by any individual without government approval is possible. So as I said the constitution has no meaning. Gun owners have the right to own the gun that the government allows, so they have no right to bear arms of their choice. Almost never did as the constitution became nothing soon after being written
In 232 years there have been only 27 amendments. That is hardly "too frequently".
But please tell us, which of the 27 amendments would you remove if you could?
To be fair, it is only giving a cause of action for unfairly moderating or a lack of transparency.
Florida Gov. DeSantis signs law to hold Big Tech companies accountable for content moderation practices
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a measure that he says will protect state residents from Silicon Valley’s “power grab on speech, thought and content.”www.foxbusiness.com
Smile
Yes, but wait for the unintended consequences.Florida Gov. DeSantis signs law to hold Big Tech companies accountable for content moderation practices
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a measure that he says will protect state residents from Silicon Valley’s “power grab on speech, thought and content.”
Smile
Yeah! Let's get those republican bastards!Let Freedom Ring ....
Down with all who HATE the US Constitution.
We've only been telling these fools that since tRump started whining about it.Florida Gov. DeSantis signs law to hold Big Tech companies accountable for content moderation practices
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a measure that he says will protect state residents from Silicon Valley’s “power grab on speech, thought and content.”
Smile
When you signed on to this forum, you agreed to abide by the rules of the forum.
If you are held accountable for breaking the rules, there is nothing you can sue over.
From your linked article:
"The law requires companies to detail how they reach conclusions about content moderation and stick to those standards consistently, DeSantis said during a press conference on Monday."
As long as the moderators follow the rules and stick to the standards, you have no complaint. This is not a free speech issue. The 1st amendment is there to prevent the gov't from silencing you. It does not apply to private property. It also does not apply when you have agreed to follow the rules set forth by the forums.
Like DeSantes being cancelled from reality.Yes, but wait for the unintended consequences.Florida Gov. DeSantis signs law to hold Big Tech companies accountable for content moderation practices
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a measure that he says will protect state residents from Silicon Valley’s “power grab on speech, thought and content.”
Smile
Yes. Yes you are.Dumbass....Florida Gov. DeSantis signs law to hold Big Tech companies accountable for content moderation practices
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a measure that he says will protect state residents from Silicon Valley’s “power grab on speech, thought and content.”
Smile
When you signed on to this forum, you agreed to abide by the rules of the forum.
If you are held accountable for breaking the rules, there is nothing you can sue over.
From your linked article:
"The law requires companies to detail how they reach conclusions about content moderation and stick to those standards consistently, DeSantis said during a press conference on Monday."
As long as the moderators follow the rules and stick to the standards, you have no complaint. This is not a free speech issue. The 1st amendment is there to prevent the gov't from silencing you. It does not apply to private property. It also does not apply when you have agreed to follow the rules set forth by the forums.
And you're a suckup.Dumbass....Florida Gov. DeSantis signs law to hold Big Tech companies accountable for content moderation practices
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a measure that he says will protect state residents from Silicon Valley’s “power grab on speech, thought and content.”
Smile
When you signed on to this forum, you agreed to abide by the rules of the forum.
If you are held accountable for breaking the rules, there is nothing you can sue over.
From your linked article:
"The law requires companies to detail how they reach conclusions about content moderation and stick to those standards consistently, DeSantis said during a press conference on Monday."
As long as the moderators follow the rules and stick to the standards, you have no complaint. This is not a free speech issue. The 1st amendment is there to prevent the gov't from silencing you. It does not apply to private property. It also does not apply when you have agreed to follow the rules set forth by the forums.
That’s always the norm for him.
So...on forums like this, posters can violate TOS if they live in Florida?Florida Gov. DeSantis signs law to hold Big Tech companies accountable for content moderation practices
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a measure that he says will protect state residents from Silicon Valley’s “power grab on speech, thought and content.”
Smile
Your "great president" just shattered the first amendment.Amen to that.Let Freedom Ring ....
Down with all who HATE the US Constitution.I keep saying Desantis would be a great president,If he got elected,this would feel like America again instead of a communist dictatership as we have seen from the likes of Bush,Obama and now Biden and the previous five administrations from 1981 all the way up to 2016.
You're utterly confused. The First Amendment restricts the government's ability to suppress free speech of private citizens. So while private companies have the right to suppress free speech as long as they don't discriminate against a protected class, the government has no such right. And since politicians are not a protected class, this bill will be killed after it's hit with its very first lawsuit.It is important to note that this distinction does not mean that suppressing speech is not suppression of speech though. Lefties are always quick to point out that it is legal for the private sector to suppress speech, but they never want to accept that suppressing speech is the same thing, regardless of if the government does it or if the private sector does it, or if the private sector does it on behalf of the government. When lefties point out that the private sector can legally suppress speech, it is almost always a strawman argument .The 1st amendment protects your freedom of speech from the gov't. It does not have any effect on what happens on private property.
You've been well groomed, even before the 2020 election, to believe that so that you can be easily manipulated.I am watching him closely ....Amen to that.
But, you know Free and Secure Elections are now a thing of the past.
I don't know, but seems like they always overlook something that comes back and bites them.Like DeSantes being cancelled from reality.Yes, but wait for the unintended consequences.Florida Gov. DeSantis signs law to hold Big Tech companies accountable for content moderation practices
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a measure that he says will protect state residents from Silicon Valley’s “power grab on speech, thought and content.”
Smile
Dumbass....Yeah! Let's get those republican bastards!
they are, snd should be treated like everyone else is the pointLet me ask you a simple question. If they aren’t publishers, why do they need protection at all?The federal law does not protect publishers. Sorry.
