C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
They do have that opportunity – they can elect to leave, they can be critical of FB on other platforms.I want the public to have the opportunity to decide for themselves.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They do have that opportunity – they can elect to leave, they can be critical of FB on other platforms.I want the public to have the opportunity to decide for themselves.
What if he deletes accounts of only black people?Trump would likewise be at liberty to exclude whomever he wishes with impunity – he could delete the accounts of liberals because they posted facts and the truth, for example.Trump is free to create his own website and post any misinformation and hate that he wishes.
I want to thank the number of people here who have identified they dont believe in free speech when it does not match the whim of their feelings
That label should stick with you for a Long Time
You can have your opinion but just take it somewhere elseThey do have that opportunity – they can elect to leave, they can be critical of FB on other platforms.I want the public to have the opportunity to decide for themselves.
Stock answer 101What if he deletes accounts of only black people?Trump would likewise be at liberty to exclude whomever he wishes with impunity – he could delete the accounts of liberals because they posted facts and the truth, for example.Trump is free to create his own website and post any misinformation and hate that he wishes.
This is a lie.Your tangent about “I want state control” has been defeated and is something you made up
‘In Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo (1974), the Supreme Court invalidated a Florida law requiring newspapers who ran articles critical of political candidates to publish a reply from the candidate. Florida argued that newspapers had monopoly power and gave a tiny elite an outsized role in public discourse — and that “fairness” regulation was necessary to protect the public’s ability to participate in the marketplace of ideas.You can have your opinion but just take it somewhere elseThey do have that opportunity – they can elect to leave, they can be critical of FB on other platforms.I want the public to have the opportunity to decide for themselves.
Are you Chinese or Russian
It can't.So how can Fla control what facebook allows to be "published" on it's "space"?
I do not advocate state control and never so stated. Like all defeated Libs You assigned your characterization on me and presented it as an admission that I made. Fake.This is a lie.Your tangent about “I want state control” has been defeated and is something you made up
The Florida measure seeking to do exactly that is proof this is a lie.
I do not advocate state control and never so stated.This is a lie.Your tangent about “I want state control” has been defeated and is something you made up
The Florida measure seeking to do exactly that is proof this is a lie.
Then you should want government as far away from private sector decisions possible.I want statist government to quit "lawfully" shitting on our rights by hiding behind the private sector.
Go on. Let's talk about this balance. What do you think I'm missing here?Some people need to get an understanding of balanced freedom of expression
What is or isn’t misinformation is very subjective in politics and should rightly be In the eye of the beholding consumer to decide and not at the censorship whim of Facebookbanning those whose thoughts beliefs and expression don’t match Facebooks agenda.
Especially if that agenda is to ban misinformation and hate speech
I want to thank the number of people here who have identified they dont believe in free speech when it does not match the whim of their feelings
That label should stick with you for a Long Time
republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.
They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.
What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.
They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.
Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.
![]()
Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.www.usatoday.com
DeSantis is welcome to host his own speech on his own website at his own cost.Some think DeSantis wants to run for nomination in 2024. We understand why you deviants and commies have to crush free political speech s well as exterminate white Xians.
DeSantis is welcome to host his own speech on his own website at his own cost.Some think DeSantis wants to run for nomination in 2024. We understand why you deviants and commies have to crush free political speech s well as exterminate white Xians.
Demanding Facebook (or any other social media company) do as the government bids to support the politicians of the state is exactly the kind of intervention conservatives used to abhor.
Lots of conservatives have no problem staying on social media. It’s just some of them that feel they don’t need to behave like adults when they’re using someone else’s platform.DeSantis is welcome to host his own speech on his own website at his own cost.Some think DeSantis wants to run for nomination in 2024. We understand why you deviants and commies have to crush free political speech s well as exterminate white Xians.
Demanding Facebook (or any other social media company) do as the government bids to support the politicians of the state is exactly the kind of intervention conservatives used to abhor.
Yes, you desperately need censorship; we already acknowledged that. No need to cry and whimper over it, gimp.
then take away their 230 protections and all will be fine,,Then you should want government as far away from private sector decisions possible.I want statist government to quit "lawfully" shitting on our rights by hiding behind the private sector.
But that's not what supposed conservatives are talking about doing. Especially with this bill.