Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis To Sign Bill Banning Social Media ‘Deplatforming’

The postal service loses millions from Amazon, as Trump demonstrated, The monopoly exists on public funding.
Nope. Trump is a liar and you’re an idiot.


After the facts were presented;


The Baghdad Bob's all came in with idiocy. But anyone with a brain can quickly glean which information is clinical fact and which is Reich bullshit.
 

The Monopoly operated in concert as a trust to shut down a competitor. Illegal and unethical. If we had a system of law in this nation that would be investigated and punished.
Go ahead and post the evidence that there as any coordination between anyone.

I’ll wait.
:lmao:

You're as stupid as you are dishonest.

 

The Monopoly operated in concert as a trust to shut down a competitor. Illegal and unethical. If we had a system of law in this nation that would be investigated and punished.
Go ahead and post the evidence that there as any coordination between anyone.

I’ll wait.
:lmao:

You're as stupid as you are dishonest.

Still looking for that evidence it was coordinated. The article says nothing about coordination.
 
Still looking for that evidence it was coordinated. The article says nothing about coordination.

:rofl:

I used to wonder about the idiots who would claim the moon landing was fake. You'd give them video and first hand accounts, but they'd come back and scream "PWUVE IT.'

I just gave you proof moron, but your psychosis it too deep, reality to you is defined by the goals of your Reich - you shift everything to serve the Reich.
 
first amendment has nothing to do with business regulating their own speech or the speech others are making under their umbrellas.
Not in the case of monopolies

Standard Oil had a constitutional right to exist

But it was too big

The same goes for Facebook which is a totally leftwing suppressor of free speech
 
The same goes for Facebook which is a totally leftwing suppressor of free speech
Facebook does not operate a monopoly.

Monopolies are almost impossible to exist on the internet given it is a virtually unlimited space.

Furthermore, Republicans have spent the last 50+ years whittling away at monopoly laws to the point that they’re nearly non-existent.
 
Still looking for that evidence it was coordinated. The article says nothing about coordination.

:rofl:

I used to wonder about the idiots who would claim the moon landing was fake. You'd give them video and first hand accounts, but they'd come back and scream "PWUVE IT.'

I just gave you proof moron, but your psychosis it too deep, reality to you is defined by the goals of your Reich - you shift everything to serve the Reich.
You gave no proof. Coordination would require planning and communication among these companies.

Things happening at the same time in response to the same event is not proof of coordination. You’d be laughed out of court with this claim, as Parler already was.
 
Facebook does not operate a monopoly.
Yes it does

There is no viable competitor for FaceBook
That doesn’t even come close to making them a monopoly.

The first problem, which is actually quite tricky, is defining what Facebook is. Then you can define who is and isn’t competition.

Twitter can be considered a competitor for Facebook.
 
Facebook does not operate a monopoly.
Yes it does

There is no viable competitor for FaceBook
That doesn’t even come close to making them a monopoly.

The first problem, which is actually quite tricky, is defining what Facebook is. Then you can define who is and isn’t competition.

Twitter can be considered a competitor for Facebook.
Thats for the courts to decide

We could also just strip them of immunity and let them be sued by everyone and his dog what members post
 
Facebook does not operate a monopoly.
Yes it does

There is no viable competitor for FaceBook
That doesn’t even come close to making them a monopoly.

The first problem, which is actually quite tricky, is defining what Facebook is. Then you can define who is and isn’t competition.

Twitter can be considered a competitor for Facebook.
Thats for the courts to decide

We could also just strip them of immunity and let them be sued by everyone and his dog what members post
Yeah, wanting to punish people merely for failing to benefit your political leaders is pretty fascist.
 

Always the excuse when government wants a cut.

No monopoly such as FascisTwat can exist without government collusion.

When the Monopoly acted in restraint of trade to crush Parler which harmed monopoly node Twitter, the federal goons refused to act, because the tech fascists operate as a defacto arm of government.
 
When the Monopoly acted in restraint of trade to crush Parler which harmed monopoly node Twitter, the federal goons refused to act, because the tech fascists operate as a defacto arm of government.
Still waiting for evidence of that coordination.
 
When the Monopoly acted in restraint of trade to crush Parler which harmed monopoly node Twitter, the federal goons refused to act, because the tech fascists operate as a defacto arm of government.
Still waiting for evidence of that coordination.

You're as stupid as you are dishonest.

 

Forum List

Back
Top