Florida's Don't Feel Bad Law.

[USAF 2023]

How does one teach slavery or Jim Crow without including race?

There is a difference between historical teaching and trying to make others feel guilty because of “ white privilege”

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I never read this topic. What I replied to was moved here. I replied to what I quoted.

Fair enough. Post 99 on page five at the bottom of the page.

 

[Coyote]

No, but some teachers do.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2021/12/06/tennessee-teacher-fired-critical-race-theory/

Nowhere in the article does it show he told any students they were racist.

 

[Coyote]

The bill isn't about that and it clearly states so. I pointed it out several times in this topic and even provided a link.

The bill creates makes a crime out of teaching anything that might make a student "uncomfortable".

 

[Coyote]

There is a difference between historical teaching and trying to make others feel guilty because of “ white privilege”

Not any more.

 

[Coyote]

What we do different is that we don’t try to make children feel guilty and responsible for history

No one is doing that.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Nowhere in the article does it show he told any students they were racist.

It's not about telling students they are racist, it's about making them feel guilty about their race.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The bill creates makes a crime out of teaching anything that might make a student "uncomfortable".

No it doesn't. For the fifth time in this topic:

The bill authorizes discussion and curricula, in an age-appropriate manner, regarding topics such as sexism, slavery, racial oppression, racial segregation, and racial discrimination.

 

[Coyote]

It's not about telling students they are racist, it's about making them feel guilty about their race.

I don't see them making anyone feel guilty.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I don't see them making anyone feel guilty.

Then perhaps look a little harder. From the article:

Then at the start of last school year, he made a pronouncement during a discussion about police shootings that would derail his career. White privilege, he told his nearly all-White class, is “a fact.”

That's not supposed to make whites feel guilty?

 

[Coyote]

No it doesn't. For the fifth time in this topic:

The bill authorizes discussion and curricula, in an age-appropriate manner, regarding topics such as sexism, slavery, racial oppression, racial segregation, and racial discrimination.

Except...for this: An individual should not be made to feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race.

That means teaching of any of those concepts could make a student uncomfortable and the teacher fired. Like the TN teacher.

 

[Coyote]

Then perhaps look a little harder. From the article:

Then at the start of last school year, he made a pronouncement during a discussion about police shootings that would derail his career. White privilege, he told his nearly all-White class, is “a fact.”

That's not supposed to make whites feel guilty?

How? The concept of white privelege, whether or not you agree with it, is not about making an individual feel guilty but recognizing there are certain systems in place that continue to benefit whites over others. So now it is taboo?

I suppose we can't talk about patriarchy either because it might a male student feel guilty.

These should be called snowflake bills.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Except...for this: An individual should not be made to feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race.

That means teaching of any of those concepts could make a student uncomfortable and the teacher fired. Like the TN teacher.

Not because of being taught history as the bill clearly outlines. What it's designed to do is stop people like that teacher from making personal comments about what is being taught. White privilege is a fact. That's not a fact, that's a very biased opinion. What if a teacher said over 50% of our murders are conducted by 7% of our population--black males. Should that be taught in school? Would you say that comment was designed to make black kids feel guilty about their race even though it's 100% truth?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

How? The concept of white privelege, whether or not you agree with it, is not about making an individual feel guilty but recognizing there are certain systems in place that continue to benefit whites over others. So now it is taboo?

I suppose we can't talk about patriarchy either because it might a male student feel guilty.

These should be called snowflake bills.

Correct, because white privilege is bullshit. There is no white privilege. If anything, there is minority privilege. It was the cause of our housing bubble and crash. It's responsible for the permission to use reverse discrimination. Now if I'm a teacher, would you want me teaching that to black students?

 

[Dragonlady]

Why?
Those were all Democrat policies.

And that's a complete lie. They were SOUTHERN policies, supported by both Republicans and Democrats.

You make a very big deal about the fact the Northern Republicans joined with Northern Democrats to pass the Civil Rights Act, but ignore the fact the SOME Southern Democrats members of the House and of both the House and Senate voted in support of that legislation but not one Southern Republican voted in favour of the Bill.

Republicans are really good at taking credit for Democrats achievements, and then blaming Democrats for Republican failures.

 

[Dragonlady]

Not because of being taught history as the bill clearly outlines. What it's designed to do is stop people like that teacher from making personal comments about what is being taught. White privilege is a fact. That's not a fact, that's a very biased opinion. What if a teacher said over 50% of our murders are conducted by 7% of our population--black males. Should that be taught in school? Would you say that comment was designed to make black kids feel guilty about their race even though it's 100% truth?

Black kids are taught a lot of things that make them feel bad about being black. That's what racism is and does to the oppressed class.

White privilege IS a fact. It's been studied and quantified, but you continue to deny it because you're one of the most racist posters on this board.

The oppressed race always turns violence on itself. Black on black violence was very high in Apartheid South Africa as well. You comment only succeeds in proving the USA is a racist nation.

Just the fact that you keep separate sets of data for blacks, whites, and hispanics on EVERYTHING proves the basic racism that is the root of your racial problems.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Black kids are taught a lot of things that make them feel bad about being black. That's what racism is and does to the oppressed class.

White privilege IS a fact. It's been studied and quantified, but you continue to deny it because you're one of the most racist posters on this board.

The oppressed race always turns violence on itself. Black on black violence was very high in Apartheid South Africa as well. You comment only succeeds in proving the USA is a racist nation.

Just the fact that you keep separate sets of data for blacks, whites, and hispanics on EVERYTHING proves the basic racism that is the root of your racial problems.

Do you think I conducted the studies or just post them? I know you're a leftist therefore hate facts, but facts are facts and can't be disputed. Only a commie would consider facts as racist.

So what are blacks being taught in school that make them feel bad? I await your evidence and credible links. White privilege is not a fact, it's an opinion by your fellow Communists. No data to support it other than whites do better than blacks, just like Asians and Jewish do better than whites. So is there Asian or Jewish privilege too?

Nobody is oppressed therefore no excuse for leading the country in every category of violence per capita. It's just another cheap leftist excuse to validate evil as your God (Satan) dictates.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And that's a complete lie. They were SOUTHERN policies, supported by both Republicans and Democrats.

You make a very big deal about the fact the Northern Republicans joined with Northern Democrats to pass the Civil Rights Act, but ignore the fact the SOME Southern Democrats members of the House and of both the House and Senate voted in support of that legislation but not one Southern Republican voted in favour of the Bill.

Republicans are really good at taking credit for Democrats achievements, and then blaming Democrats for Republican failures.

Fact Check: ‘More Republicans Voted for the Civil Rights Act as a Percentage Than Democrats Did’

Throughout the 1950s and ’60s, Republicans were generally more unified than Democrats in support of civil rights legislation.

www.dailysignal.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And that's a complete lie. They were SOUTHERN policies, supported by both Republicans and Democrats.

You make a very big deal about the fact the Northern Republicans joined with Northern Democrats to pass the Civil Rights Act, but ignore the fact the SOME Southern Democrats members of the House and of both the House and Senate voted in support of that legislation but not one Southern Republican voted in favour of the Bill.

Republicans are really good at taking credit for Democrats achievements, and then blaming Democrats for Republican failures.

They were SOUTHERN policies, supported by both Republicans and Democrats.

Which southern Republicans supported slavery, Jim Crow, black codes or segregation?

not one Southern Republican voted in favour of the Bill.

List the Southern Republicans that voted against it.

 

[scruffy]

No one is doing that.

The level of brain dead denial from the left is truly alarming.

Some of these people show us daily that they have but one neuron left.

It's the one they couldn't kill off in the sixties, in spite of their best efforts