Zander
Platinum Member
- Sep 10, 2009
- 22,519
- 9,106
Right wing solution: It's your fault for being poor, stop using diapers, here, take this rag.
David's "leftwing" solution to every human problem is "more free shit from the government".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right wing solution: It's your fault for being poor, stop using diapers, here, take this rag.
Yes, because we should expect mothers to use uncomfortable fabric for their babies.. Typical RW solution.How about use cloth and not expensive disposal diapers?
A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
Two incomes are NOT required.It is nice to read of this example of private charity.
My wife and I used reusable diapers with our child, mostly. They are expensive up front but save money in the long run.
They do require more time for washings. As we had a washer and drying in our house this was not much of a chore.
We used disposables when we were out.
I was working only part time at the time, and at night.
A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
My wife hasn't worked since our wedding day and we've raised four kids, ten grandkids and three greatgrandkids.
And that's with all of them living with us at one time or another.
Have two grands and two greatgrands sitting in my living room right now.
You don't need the suv and the prius.
You don't need flatscreens in every room.
You don't need $300 cellphones.
If we shrunk the population, if poor people had less kids, if more kids were raised properly, we could have less of all those negative things.A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
if this.... if that.... if something else
humans are flawed and you can't "fix" or socially engineer human traits away...
The Two income family is not a "human trait" it is a result of policy and culture.
Two incomes are NOT required.It is nice to read of this example of private charity.
My wife and I used reusable diapers with our child, mostly. They are expensive up front but save money in the long run.
They do require more time for washings. As we had a washer and drying in our house this was not much of a chore.
We used disposables when we were out.
I was working only part time at the time, and at night.
A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
My wife hasn't worked since our wedding day and we've raised four kids, ten grandkids and three greatgrandkids.
And that's with all of them living with us at one time or another.
Have two grands and two greatgrands sitting in my living room right now.
You don't need the suv and the prius.
You don't need flatscreens in every room.
You don't need $300 cellphones.
My wife recently talked me into moving to a bigger house.
Now we find that she needs to work more. It is very annoying.
I have hopes that that will be a temporary situation, on the order of a few months.
A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
If we shrunk the population, if poor people had less kids, if more kids were raised properly, we could have less of all those negative things.A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
if this.... if that.... if something else
humans are flawed and you can't "fix" or socially engineer human traits away...
The Two income family is not a "human trait" it is a result of policy and culture.
strawman...and cherry picking
never said it was, did I?
If we shrunk the population, if poor people had less kids, if more kids were raised properly, we could have less of all those negative things.Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
if this.... if that.... if something else
humans are flawed and you can't "fix" or socially engineer human traits away...
The Two income family is not a "human trait" it is a result of policy and culture.
strawman...and cherry picking
never said it was, did I?
I said I wanted it, you said that we can't have it because of "negative human trait".
If that was not what you meant, please restate your point more simply for me.
A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
right...by "crafting" artificial "policies"? Tell me a few of them..maybe you can convince me..
A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
We continue to want bigger, better and the latest, then it won't happen.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
right...by "crafting" artificial "policies"? Tell me a few of them..maybe you can convince me..
1. Deport illegals and stop further immigration to reduce supply of labor and encourage higher wages.
2. Tariffs against nations that we have large trade deficits with.
3. School vouchers that can also be used for homeschooling.
4. Repeal of truancy laws and child labor laws to end artificially extended "childhood" for young adults, and thus reduce cost per child.
For starters.
Capitalism relies on that...on the very nature of keeping up with the Jones's...A society where two incomes in NOT REQUIRED, is a goal of mine, and imo, should be a goal of society.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
We continue to want bigger, better and the latest, then it won't happen.
Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
We continue to want bigger, better and the latest, then it won't happen.
Hey, changing that could be Change I would support.
Capitalism relies on that...on the very nature of keeping up with the Jones's...Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
We continue to want bigger, better and the latest, then it won't happen.
As per President Bush, the 1 thing we could do as Americans after 9/11 was:
to go SHOPPING!
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
We continue to want bigger, better and the latest, then it won't happen.
Hey, changing that could be Change I would support.
Like going along with your wife in getting a bigger better home so she can work more hours?
Capitalism relies on that...on the very nature of keeping up with the Jones's...Very noble "goal" but impossible in the real world.
Humans are flawed creatures and there will always be iniquities, failure, crime, oppression, corruption, insanity, dishonesty and every other negative human trait you can think of.
There is nothing impossible about it.
Craft policy to encourage rising wages, and reduce living expenses.
More and more families would be able to go to one income and one full time homemaker.
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
We continue to want bigger, better and the latest, then it won't happen.
As per President Bush, the 1 thing we could do as Americans after 9/11 was:
to go SHOPPING!
20 some thousand years of human evolution tend to disprove.
...you can "craft" all the "policies" you want...artificial social engineering doesn't work.
The majority of families only had one income as recently as the 60s.
If we want to make that an easier option, we can.
We continue to want bigger, better and the latest, then it won't happen.
Hey, changing that could be Change I would support.
Like going along with your wife in getting a bigger better home so she can work more hours?
Exactly.
I hope to repair that damage to our finances soon, and I will be more resistant in the future.