Shogun
Free: Mudholes Stomped
- Jan 8, 2007
- 30,528
- 2,263
- 1,045
Prove me wrong. Or keep flaming me, your choice.
ruh roh, ravikins.. more TAX topics, eh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prove me wrong. Or keep flaming me, your choice.
That's BS. Poor people don't vote in any large numbers. More right wing nonsense.See, that's the thing though. The government doesn't want people like you getting assistance, because you only need them for a little while until you are doing better, and then you don't depend on them anymore.
They want the people who make their living collecting government hand-outs. The kind of people who vote BASED on those benefits. It's a system of control. When you have people depending on you to survive, you have them wrapped around your finger.
Dave, if you are still reading this, it sounds as if you don't quite remember if you wrote off that charitable donation or not...at least you didn't emphatically say you wouldn't write one off...does that mean you would have if you could?
And if so, doesn't that kind of make it so you did benefit from a government handout?
That's BS. Poor people don't vote in any large numbers. More right wing nonsense.
Wait, maybe you're talking about poor, church going people in middle America. In that case, you could be right.
They don't, huh?
Well then why would the GOP have needed to pull those tactics in the inner cities that so many dems claim they pulled to keep those people from being able to vote?
Not that you ever personally claimed that, but it certainly is a typical liberal talking point.
How do you figure that "poor" people don't vote in large numbers? You're telling me that people who live off the government don't vote?
Actually, I don't believe anyone ever said those tactics were to keep *poor* people from voting. They were to keep *black* people from voting.
You know that the two aren't interchangeable, right?
Paulie once again practicing what he preaches.
Actually, I don't believe anyone ever said those tactics were to keep *poor* people from voting. They were to keep *black* people from voting.
You know that the two aren't interchangeable, right?
sigh
No, you need to go back and read the thread.
I agree the government wants control. And you could be right, this is one way of keeping some control since nothing ever gets done about it by either side.Rav I really don't have any desire to derail this thread anymore than it already has been. thanks mani.
Where we're potentially going is a hot button issue and it will most likely kill the topic. The main point I originally made was that government wants control, and they get it by keeping people attached to their tit. They only seem willing to give so much, if any at all, to the ones who obviously only need it temporarily, but the ones who need it perpetually have no problem re-upping after every review.
The main point I originally made was that government wants control, and they get it by keeping people attached to their tit.