- Nov 17, 2009
- 70,316
- 38,134
YesNo, and it isn't even closeWhat other religio-cultures widely practice FGM?
Couldn't you make a similar argument about circumcision?
Circumcision can at least be justified as a healthy choice and it is not mutilation of nerve tissue
Nor does it diminish sexual pleasure
FGM is straight up barbaric and parents that allow it, especially in the West should rot in Hell
So when it's done on a male it's a healthy choice, but when done on a female it's mutilation?
I don't know what you are trying to accomplish with this line of reasoning
FGM is done solely to keep women in line and to ensure that they do not engage in sex for pleasure
There is a huge difference
If you don't need a foreskin why would your god have given you one? I thought he was infallible.