Former CIA Official: Looks Like Whistleblower Had Outside Help Fabricating the Complaint

And he suspects Congressional help....
Time to investigate who helped.


“I am very familiar with transcripts of presidential phone calls since I edited and processed dozens of them when I worked for the NSC. I also know a lot about intelligence whistleblowers from my time with the CIA.

My suspicions grew this morning when I saw the declassified whistleblowing complaint. It appears to be written by a law professor and includes legal references and detailed footnotes. It also has an unusual legalistic reference on how this complaint should be classified.

From my experience, such an extremely polished whistleblowing complaint is unheard of. This document looks as if this leaker had outside help, possibly from congressional members or staff. . . .

Also very concerning to me is how the complaint indicates intelligence officers and possibly other federal employees are violating the rules governing presidential phone calls with foreign leaders.

The content and transcripts of these calls are highly restricted. The whistleblower makes clear in his complaint that he did not listen to a call in question, nor did he read the transcript — he was told about the call by others. If true, intelligence officers have grossly violated the rules as well as the trust placed on them to protect this sensitive information.

I refuse to believe that the leaking, timing and presentation of this complaint is coincidence. I don’t think the American people will buy this either.

I’m more worried, however, that this latest instance of blatant politicization of intelligence by Trump haters will do long term damage to the relationship between the intelligence community and US presidents for many years to come.”

https://nypost.com/2019/09/26/forme...wer-how-could-this-be-an-intelligence-matter/
The complaint wasn't fabricated. The phone transcript proves Trump colluded with a foreign power to help him defeat a political opponent.


Bullshit, they discussed and open and transparent investigation into possible corruption. Biden openly admitted extorting Ukraine to fire a prosecutor investigating a company his son was getting 50K a month from. Documents have surfaced form the Ukraine prosecutors office that the US lawyers representing the company met with the new prosecutor and apologized for the false narrative started by the US admin, that the former prosecutor was corrupt. The shit is going to get much deeper before it's all sorted out.

.
You are repeating a debunked conspiracy theory.
It's not a conspiracy theory, and it hasn't been debunked.
 
The complaint wasn't fabricated. The phone transcript proves Trump colluded with a foreign power to help him defeat a political opponent.
So when do we get to see all of Obama's phone conversation transcripts ?
141111-obama-china-2111_9ecfa25a693dc9688c9b64fc454568aa.jpg

During his impeachment inquiry?
Time is up it’s to the shop to be dealt with time now. See ya Barry Soto

Somebody call the translator.......I'm sure there is something funny in that!
said the blind man.

........as he picked up his hammer and sawed.
 
You know everything you posted?

It's all bullshit. Every single syllable.


Well commie, the documents are available for you to read. You commies are so gullible, you just crack me up.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

.
Did you see in the whistleblower complaint?


"From N.7 on page 5:

Mr. Lutsenko later told Bloomberg on 16 May that former Vice President Biden and his son were not subject to any current Ukrainian investigations, and that he had no evidence against them. Other senior Ukrainian officials also contested his original allegations; one former senior Ukrainian prosecutor told Bloomberg on 7 May that Mr. Shokin in fact was not investigating Burisma at the time of his removal in 2016."


All the sources in a Solomon article are additional articles by Solomon that use additional Solomon articles as more sources.

Spin is deeply misleading.


Did you read Shokin's sworn deposition to the Austrian court, he states otherwise. He was investigating Burisma.

.

.
Shokin has zero crediblity.
Shokin was fired for failing to go after corruption.
Shokin didnt investigate Burisma, that was the primary complaint about thim.


Of course you have sworn testimony to back that up, RIGHT?

.
When a known liar swears does that make him more credible?
 
Well commie, the documents are available for you to read. You commies are so gullible, you just crack me up.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

.
Did you see in the whistleblower complaint?


"From N.7 on page 5:

Mr. Lutsenko later told Bloomberg on 16 May that former Vice President Biden and his son were not subject to any current Ukrainian investigations, and that he had no evidence against them. Other senior Ukrainian officials also contested his original allegations; one former senior Ukrainian prosecutor told Bloomberg on 7 May that Mr. Shokin in fact was not investigating Burisma at the time of his removal in 2016."


All the sources in a Solomon article are additional articles by Solomon that use additional Solomon articles as more sources.

Spin is deeply misleading.


Did you read Shokin's sworn deposition to the Austrian court, he states otherwise. He was investigating Burisma.

.

.
Shokin has zero crediblity.
Shokin was fired for failing to go after corruption.
Shokin didnt investigate Burisma, that was the primary complaint about thim.


Of course you have sworn testimony to back that up, RIGHT?

.
When a known liar swears does that make him more credible?
Nothing could make Hillary credible.
 
Well commie, the documents are available for you to read. You commies are so gullible, you just crack me up.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

.
Did you see in the whistleblower complaint?


"From N.7 on page 5:

Mr. Lutsenko later told Bloomberg on 16 May that former Vice President Biden and his son were not subject to any current Ukrainian investigations, and that he had no evidence against them. Other senior Ukrainian officials also contested his original allegations; one former senior Ukrainian prosecutor told Bloomberg on 7 May that Mr. Shokin in fact was not investigating Burisma at the time of his removal in 2016."


All the sources in a Solomon article are additional articles by Solomon that use additional Solomon articles as more sources.

Spin is deeply misleading.


Did you read Shokin's sworn deposition to the Austrian court, he states otherwise. He was investigating Burisma.

.

.
Shokin has zero crediblity.
Shokin was fired for failing to go after corruption.
Shokin didnt investigate Burisma, that was the primary complaint about thim.


Of course you have sworn testimony to back that up, RIGHT?

.
When a known liar swears does that make him more credible?


So you got nothing, got it. LMAO

.
 
Did you see in the whistleblower complaint?


"From N.7 on page 5:

Mr. Lutsenko later told Bloomberg on 16 May that former Vice President Biden and his son were not subject to any current Ukrainian investigations, and that he had no evidence against them. Other senior Ukrainian officials also contested his original allegations; one former senior Ukrainian prosecutor told Bloomberg on 7 May that Mr. Shokin in fact was not investigating Burisma at the time of his removal in 2016."


All the sources in a Solomon article are additional articles by Solomon that use additional Solomon articles as more sources.

Spin is deeply misleading.


Did you read Shokin's sworn deposition to the Austrian court, he states otherwise. He was investigating Burisma.

.

.
Shokin has zero crediblity.
Shokin was fired for failing to go after corruption.
Shokin didnt investigate Burisma, that was the primary complaint about thim.


Of course you have sworn testimony to back that up, RIGHT?

.
When a known liar swears does that make him more credible?


So you got nothing, got it. LMAO

.
You gullible rubes are just falling for the same nonsense the orange turd fell for, when he went "full corrupt" on Ukraine. While you guys are used to being embarrassed and wrong and will just move on to the next nonsense that comes across your AM dial, Trump will face the music.
 
Did you read Shokin's sworn deposition to the Austrian court, he states otherwise. He was investigating Burisma.

.

.
Shokin has zero crediblity.
Shokin was fired for failing to go after corruption.
Shokin didnt investigate Burisma, that was the primary complaint about thim.


Of course you have sworn testimony to back that up, RIGHT?

.
When a known liar swears does that make him more credible?


So you got nothing, got it. LMAO

.
You gullible rubes are just falling for the same nonsense the orange turd fell for, when he went "full corrupt" on Ukraine. While you guys are used to being embarrassed and wrong and will just move on to the next nonsense that comes across your AM dial, Trump will face the music.
Tell us more about Russia and how Pelosi is covering for Trump.
 
Shokin has zero crediblity.
Shokin was fired for failing to go after corruption.
Shokin didnt investigate Burisma, that was the primary complaint about thim.


Of course you have sworn testimony to back that up, RIGHT?

.
When a known liar swears does that make him more credible?


So you got nothing, got it. LMAO

.
You gullible rubes are just falling for the same nonsense the orange turd fell for, when he went "full corrupt" on Ukraine. While you guys are used to being embarrassed and wrong and will just move on to the next nonsense that comes across your AM dial, Trump will face the music.
Tell us more about Russia and how Pelosi is covering for Trump.
Why would I spend a shred of energy spoonfeeding your goofy fantasies back to you? You're dumb.
 
Former CIA chief John Brennan may as well have become an agent of foreign government efforts to undermine the U.S. fabric of society and the orderly transition of political power when he took the job as a CNN contributor. When you take Brennan's attitude into consideration it makes you wonder if the CIA has joined the FBI leadership in a political coup.
 
Former CIA chief John Brennan may as well have become an agent of foreign government efforts to undermine the U.S. fabric of society and the orderly transition of political power when he took the job as a CNN contributor. When you take Brennan's attitude into consideration it makes you wonder if the CIA has joined the FBI leadership in a political coup.
History is going to look back on your guys' use of the word "coup" and laugh at you.
 
Well commie, the documents are available for you to read. You commies are so gullible, you just crack me up.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

.
Did you see in the whistleblower complaint?


"From N.7 on page 5:

Mr. Lutsenko later told Bloomberg on 16 May that former Vice President Biden and his son were not subject to any current Ukrainian investigations, and that he had no evidence against them. Other senior Ukrainian officials also contested his original allegations; one former senior Ukrainian prosecutor told Bloomberg on 7 May that Mr. Shokin in fact was not investigating Burisma at the time of his removal in 2016."


All the sources in a Solomon article are additional articles by Solomon that use additional Solomon articles as more sources.

Spin is deeply misleading.


Did you read Shokin's sworn deposition to the Austrian court, he states otherwise. He was investigating Burisma.

.

.
Shokin has zero crediblity.
Shokin was fired for failing to go after corruption.
Shokin didnt investigate Burisma, that was the primary complaint about thim.


Of course you have sworn testimony to back that up, RIGHT?

.
When a known liar swears does that make him more credible?
Not any more than repeating a lie and discrediting the truth.
 
Did you read Shokin's sworn deposition to the Austrian court, he states otherwise. He was investigating Burisma.

.

.
Shokin has zero crediblity.
Shokin was fired for failing to go after corruption.
Shokin didnt investigate Burisma, that was the primary complaint about thim.


Of course you have sworn testimony to back that up, RIGHT?

.
When a known liar swears does that make him more credible?


So you got nothing, got it. LMAO

.
You gullible rubes are just falling for the same nonsense the orange turd fell for, when he went "full corrupt" on Ukraine. While you guys are used to being embarrassed and wrong and will just move on to the next nonsense that comes across your AM dial, Trump will face the music.


I provided a link with sworn statements, all you commies have are talking points. Carry on.

.
 
There is no fact that libbies won’t deflect with feelings fiction
They truely Are carrying on with a 3 year temper tantrum. Thus, we consider them and address them as the children that they are.
 
I provided a link with sworn statements
So what? Trump surrounds himself with people who go to jail for lying. Not compelling.


You might want to check the link, they have documents form the Ukraine prosecutors and much more. I haven't had a chance to read them all, but so far no Trump people. Perhaps you should educate your ignorant commie self.

.
 
Did you see in the whistleblower complaint?


"From N.7 on page 5:

Mr. Lutsenko later told Bloomberg on 16 May that former Vice President Biden and his son were not subject to any current Ukrainian investigations, and that he had no evidence against them. Other senior Ukrainian officials also contested his original allegations; one former senior Ukrainian prosecutor told Bloomberg on 7 May that Mr. Shokin in fact was not investigating Burisma at the time of his removal in 2016."


All the sources in a Solomon article are additional articles by Solomon that use additional Solomon articles as more sources.

Spin is deeply misleading.


Did you read Shokin's sworn deposition to the Austrian court, he states otherwise. He was investigating Burisma.

.

.
Shokin has zero crediblity.
Shokin was fired for failing to go after corruption.
Shokin didnt investigate Burisma, that was the primary complaint about thim.


Of course you have sworn testimony to back that up, RIGHT?

.
When a known liar swears does that make him more credible?


So you got nothing, got it. LMAO

.
You do know what a question is, right?
 
Of course you have sworn testimony to back that up, RIGHT?

.
When a known liar swears does that make him more credible?


So you got nothing, got it. LMAO

.
You gullible rubes are just falling for the same nonsense the orange turd fell for, when he went "full corrupt" on Ukraine. While you guys are used to being embarrassed and wrong and will just move on to the next nonsense that comes across your AM dial, Trump will face the music.
Tell us more about Russia and how Pelosi is covering for Trump.
Why would I spend a shred of energy spoonfeeding your goofy fantasies back to you? You're dumb.
Fantasies?
Tell us more about voter suppression, Russia, and Ukraine, shitforbrains.
 

Forum List

Back
Top