Former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis agrees to cooperate in Arizona elector case

[NotfooledbyW]

They were contingent electors. Their only reason being there was if recount lawsuits were successful, they were in place to cast alternate votes

This statement is an outright lie, liar................

Not what I said.

, You were quoted verbatim word for word.

You said “Their {fake electors} only reason being there was if recount lawsuits were successful” knowing damn well there we’d no recount lawsuits in the entire nation after December 14 2020,

You said “Their {fake electors} only reason being there was if recount lawsuits were successful” knowing damn well there we’d no recount lawsuits in the entire nation after December 14 2020,


You are a liar. A very bad liar, but a liar just the same.

 

[Delldude]

Only that they conspired to make a slate of alternate electors for submission to Congress, not in accordance with the votes cast and not signed off on, by the states. Totally fake, for the purpose of causing confusion, holding up the process and possibly overturning the election, that had be validated at the polls, the recounts, and in 62 plus court cases, where dumbass crooked trump lawyers failed to prove any wrong doing. The fake elector scheme was come up with by Trump people trying to overthrow the election, several involved, having already turned states evidence to avoid long prison sentences, themselves. Just the usual stuff, everybody knows about these crooked Anti-American assholes.

They had cases before the courts in swing states to contest the count. That's the hows and whys of alternate electors if the states had count issues.

 

[Delldude]

You were quoted verbatim word for word.

In which I never claimed 'fake electors' were legal.

You said “Their {fake electors} only reason being there was if recount lawsuits were successful” knowing damn well there we’d no recount lawsuits in the entire nation after December 14 2020,

That is not a verbatim statement it is one you altered, liar.

 

[Billo_Really]

Jenna Ellis agreed to roll in the Arizona version of the elector cases. Looks like she primarily rolled against Giuliani.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/05/jenna-ellis-arizona/

You mean "fake elector" case? This was the attempted voter fraud by Trump and his minions in several states to influence the election.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Was the election overturned?

It certainly could’ve been if Mike Pence had agreed to recognize the fake electors’ certificates.


NFBW wrote: As you can see, POST-298 was not about DJT officials and politicians helping to plan a peaceful STOP THE STEAL RALLY. It was about those TRUMP enablers who helped with the Eastman Plan to overturn the election on Jan6.

The peaceful rally accomplishes nothing on January 6.

It was the Eastman Plan that would have destroyed democracy had it succeeded.

The violent mob believed it was their patriotic duty to stop the certification process to save America as DJT led them to believe when, in the midst of the riot, DJT tweeted to the violent mob that Pence was a coward. So the mob wanted to hang him. 21OCT25-POST#298

struth wrote: …so what? Folks helped plan a rally....we know that...who cares? 21OCT24-POST#299. struth said: what facts am i avoiding?

Oldestyle wrote: Oh, now there is a "written plan" to destroy democracy, NotFooled? You of course have SEEN this plan...right? (eye roll) 21OCT25-POST#316

NotfooledbyW said: read it yourself: 21OCT25-POST#319

Correll wrote: Trump called for a demonstration to put political pressure on Congress. You saying "disrupt" is you lying. 21OCT16-POST#882

NFBW wrote: It’s laid out in the Eastman Memo: 21OCT16-POST#886

1. VP Pence, presiding over the joint session (or Senate Pro Tempore Grassley, if Pence recuses himself), begins to open and count the ballots,….

2. When he gets to Arizona, he announces that he has multiple slates of electors, and so is going to defer decision on that until finishing the other States. [FIRST DISRUPTION >> }This would be the first break with the procedure set out in the Act.

3. At the end, he announces that because of the ongoing disputes in the 7 States, there are no electors that can be deemed validly appointed in those States.

{You don’t think this would be a disruption Correll >>>} Pence then gavels President Trump as re-elected there as well​

EASTMAN tells DJT It’s disruptive>>>}

4. Howls, of course, from the Democrats, who were now claim, contrary to Tribe’s prior position, that 270 is required. So Pence says, fine

. Pursuant to the 12th Amendment, no candidate has achieved the necessary majority.

That sends the matter to the House, where the “the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote . . . .”

Republicans currently control 26 of the state delegations, the bare majority needed to win that vote. President Trump is re-elected there as well.

5. One last piece. Assuming the Electoral Count Act process is followed and, upon getting the objections to the Arizona slates, the two houses break into their separate chambers, we should not allow the Electoral Count Act constraint on debate to control. That would mean that a prior legislature was determining the rules of the present one — a constitutional no-no (as Tribe has forcefully argued). So someone – Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, etc. – should demand normal rules (which includes the filibuster). That creates a stalemate that would give the state legislatures more time to weigh in to formally support the alternate slate of electors, if they had not already done so.


{But PENCE WAS A COWARD AFTER THE DISRUPTION of the riot was over AND STUCK WITH THE PROCESS >>>}

6. The main thing here is that Pence should do this without asking for permission – either from a vote of the joint session or from the Court. Let the other side challenge his actions in court, where Tribe (who in 2001 conceded the President of the Senate might be in charge of counting the votes) and others who would press a lawsuit would have their past position -- that these are non-justiciable political questions – thrown back at them, to get the lawsuit dismissed.

The fact is that the Constitution assigns this power to the Vice President as the ultimate arbiter.

We should take all of our actions with that in mind. TRUMP-Jan6-COUPattempt “””

Oldestyle said: Where in that mess was any "written plan" to destroy our Democracy? Why do you talk out of your ass, Notfooled? You always get called on it and you always look like an idiot.

 

[White 6]

Were you confused? Was the election overturned? Did they make false statements? You've bought whole hog into your cult's lawfare and demonetization of Trump.

For God's sake, grow a set and think for yourself.

I didn't even like them attempt to overthrow the election. Once the vote are cast, counted and repeatedly challenged in court, failing every time for lack of proof, it is over, and the legitimate losers need to abide by the result. You grow up, and adopt adherence to the constitution and the principles you were supposed to learn in civics and history, when you were a kid.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

That is not a verbatim statement it is one you altered, liar.

What is altered .

In which I never claimed 'fake electors' were legal.


That is not a verbatim statement it is one you altered, liar.

Delldude said: They were contingent electors. Their only reason being there was if recount lawsuits were successful, they were in place to cast alternate votes

What was your intent when you wrote that which is highlighted in bold above?

 

[Lastamender]

I didn't even like them attempt to overthrow the election. Once the vote are cast, counted and repeatedly challenged in court, failing every time for lack of proof, it is over, and the legitimate losers need to abide by the result. You grow up, and adopt adherence to the constitution and the principles you were supposed to learn in civics and history, when you were a kid.

When evidence is never heard and the states in question refuse to cooperate? Kiss my ass.

 

[Rawley]

It certainly could’ve been if Mike Pence had agreed to recognize the fake electors’ certificates.

Nope. It would have gone back to the states for true/transparent investigation of voter fraud

 

[Delldude]

Delldude said: They were contingent electors. Their only reason being there was if recount lawsuits were successful, they were in place to cast alternate votes

Why are you now ducking form your original claim of my statement, liar?

Here's you altered statement of what I said, liar:

You said “Their {fake electors} only reason being there was if recount lawsuits were successful” knowing damn well there we’d no recount lawsuits in the entire nation after December 14 2020,

You were quoted verbatim word for word.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Delldude said: They were contingent electors. Their only reason being there was if recount lawsuits were successful, they were in place to cast alternate votesL


You say the only reason “contingent“ electors who were “fake“ electors were there was if recount lawsuits were successful….

You are a liar. I am telling you again.

You are lying because there were no recount lawsuits in any courtroom in any state of the United States of America after December 14, 2020.

You put those words together exactly as you did because you are a liar

 

[Delldude]

You are lying because there were no recount lawsuits in any courtroom in any state of the United States of America after December 14, 2020.

Yep.........they were awaiting decisions or state actions filed before Dec 14th.............

 

[White 6]

When evidence is never heard and the states in question refuse to cooperate? Kiss my ass.

Looks like the Supreme Court says you lack standing to run other states elections, just like they ruled against the Attorney General of Texas. If you can't get them to rule in your favor on everything, you will just have to buy some more.

 

[Rawley]

I didn't even like them attempt to overthrow the election.

The goes the whole hog buy in into your cult's false narrative.

Once the vote are cast, counted and repeatedly challenged in court, failing every time for lack of proof, it is over, and the legitimate losers need to abide by the result. You grow up, and adopt adherence to the constitution and the principles you were supposed to learn in civics and history, when you were a kid.

And you a poopyhead. Do you think that helps your argument?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Delldude said: They were contingent electors. Their only reason being there was if recount lawsuits were successful, they were in place to cast alternate votes

NotfooledbyW said: It certainly could’ve been if Mike Pence had agreed to recognize the fake electors’ certificates.

January 6, 2021 8:17 a.m.: Trump tweets: “All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!"​

Rawley said: Nope. It would have gone back to the states for true/transparent investigation of voter fraud

Nope.

Saint\Rawley is telling everybody that Trump tried to overturn the election just like I have been saying.

And just like Trump said on January 6, 2021.

January 6, 2021 8:17 a.m.: Trump tweets: “All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!"​

i. Obnoxious Leftist refuses to sit next to Trump supporter on plane. 240803 {post•281}. NotfooledbyW Aug’24 Volrts inserts Don Trump J6 happy MAGA MESSAGE: “All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people.” 21JAN06-DJT-jEASTMAN. see: Vpcotb00224 nfbw 240803 Volrts00281

 

[Delldude]

Delldude said: They were contingent electors. Their only reason being there was if recount lawsuits were successful, they were in place to cast alternate votes

Based on several states results having been contested and pending in several courts and states. That too hard for you to comprehend?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

ep.........they were awaiting decisions or state actions filed before Dec 14th...........

There were none. You are a liar.

 

[White 6]

The goes the whole hog buy in into your cult's false narrative.



And you a poopyhead. Do you think that helps your argument?

Because it is the truth. Most of Trump's hand-picked staff, agree, he lost, same as his handpicked heads of DOJ, FBI and Department of Homeland defense, as well. This is why the majority of his hand-picked senior staff do not support him, this time, and many want nothing to do with him. You are just nuts, like the senile orange criminal you support.

 

[Rawley]

Saint\Rawley is telling everybody that Trump tried to overturn the election just like I have been saying.

Nope. But don't let that slow your rant down.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Why are you now ducking form your original claim of my statement, liar?

I am not ducking anything. Your client they were “contingent“ electors is a lie.