Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a few hundred is a mistake. 85,000 is intentionalAgain, that was a mistake.
It's not about me, It's about Harris and your party's very intentional policy decision to throw the border wide open to all comers. It's going to be a top issue in the election.Are you claiming to be compassionate for the plight of immigrants? How do you express that if so?
Actually, you're projecting. It's comical that a Dem/ Socialist who defends their child sex trafficking syndicate would try and accuse others of neglecting child welfare.Again, you’re just not being honest here.
The welfare of children from central and South America is NOT anywhere on your list of concerns. It’s why you won’t say how your desired policy helps them.
I believe it is fair to say that just as we aren’t the policemen of the world, so too we aren’t the hospital for the world. We have problems a plenty right here in our own land.Again, you’re just not being honest here.
The welfare of children from central and South America is NOT anywhere on your list of concerns. It’s why you won’t say how your desired policy helps them.
"OOPS" sorry about the mistake. No harm no foul. What a pathetic sidestep.Again, that was a mistake.
Are you claiming to be compassionate for the plight of immigrants? How do you express that if so?
1. We need a bill because the only year border crossings went down under Trump was 2020 during covid. They went up every other year and 2019 they spiked higher than any year under Obama. He was doing worse until Covid.1 Why did we need a bill at all? 2 And why wait til the election year? 3 Asking for a friend.
Your characterization and opinion do not reflect reality.a few hundred is a mistake. 85,000 is intentional
It's not about me, It's about Harris and your party's very intentional policy decision to throw the border wide open to all comers. It's going to be a top issue in the election.
Better to have an imperfect policy of compassion than a perfect policy of cruelty."OOPS" sorry about the mistake. No harm no foul. What a pathetic sidestep.
It’s an absurd argument. No one has ever said it thought we’d create a utopia or save everyone on the planet from poverty.I believe it is fair to say that just as we aren’t the policemen of the world, so too we aren’t the hospital for the world. We have problems a plenty right here in our own land.
Why do you libs pretend that we have some obligation to provide aid for all the people hurting all over the planet? It’s a fantasy driven utopian dream of sorts. But the basic premise of your above-quoted post is flatly ridiculous and unachievable.
Does thatconme with a jingle? You continue to excuse the intentional policy of Dem/ Socialist child sex trafficking.Better to have an imperfect policy of compassion than a perfect policy of cruelty.
Well, that’s not true. But it still remains implicit in the stupidly worded question you had posed.It’s an absurd argument. No one has ever said it thought we’d create a utopia or save everyone on the planet from poverty.
We can do a lot. We can’t do it all. And it actually isn’t our obligation. Plus, you silly utopian dreamers always manage to forget the “cost” part of the equation.But we can do more than what happened under Trump.
Economically? Nonsense.Economically, his policy of mass deportations from the interior is bad news. I doubt he will actually do it.
Tim Walz is 60. One year older than Harris.What's so safe about choosing an old coot like Walz, to help Kamala oppose a vibrant team of Trump and Vance?
President Trump took a bullet to the face and no-sold it. The man may be 77, but he could kick Walz's ass easily.
Again, your belief that it’s “intentional” is baseless. You’ve repeatedly lied about it.Does thatconme with a jingle? You continue to excuse the intentional policy of Dem/ Socialist child sex trafficking.
I can’t argue with what you believe is “implicit”. That’s your belief which is based largely on your own bias.Well, that’s not true. But it still remains implicit in the stupidly worded question you had posed.
Is it or is it not your contention that America has some obligation to help all the people of the world to be safe, secure, nourished and hydrated and medically cared for?
We can do a lot. We can’t do it all. And it actually isn’t our obligation. Plus, you silly utopian dreamers always manage to forget the “cost” part of the equation.
Economically? Nonsense.
Step one is to properly secure our border.
Step two is to ramp up the ability of our immigration courts and enforcement agents to kick illegal aliens rhe fuck out of our land.
One of the signs that a liberal like you is clueless is your unwillingness to note the difference between legal and illegal immigration. The former is terrific and the USA is awesome when it comes to legal immigration. The latter isn’t awesome. It’s awful and our government needs to stop it entirely.
Your child sex trafficking syndicate hss gone on for years, now. Quite obviously, you want it to continue as a deliberate act.Again, your belief that it’s “intentional” is baseless. You’ve repeatedly lied about it.
How is that obvious when I’ve said repeatedly that the system can and should be fixed competent this?Your child sex trafficking syndicate hss gone on for years, now. Quite obviously, you want it to continue as a deliberate act.
Perfect for socialists like you though! As your boy says "one person's socialism, is another's neighborliness"It was the safest choice for sure.
Not the sexist, but the safest.
How about the American women and children raped and murdered by the unvetted scum Harris let in? Let guess - they could have been raped and murdered by Americans. But they weren't, they were raped and murdered by the unvetted scum Harris let in.Your characterization and opinion do not reflect reality.
It was a policy fundamentally coming from a place of compassion. People were seeking a better life here.
"Can and should" mean nothing as you obviously can't cite a single thling Dems are doing to fix the problem they created.How is that obvious when I’ve said repeatedly that the system can and should be fixed competent this?
That’s right. You ignore anything that doesn’t service the narrative.
Minneapolis burned?He is an extreme leftist who did nothing when Minneapolis burned. He loves Abortion and all the usual leftist stuff. If you are a sniveling whiney cry baby Democrat he is your perfect pick.
But that comes from a "place of compassion".How about the American women and children raped and murdered by the unvetted scum Harris let in? Let guess - they could have been raped and murdered by Americans. But they weren't, they were raped and murdered by the unvetted scum Harris let in.
