martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 82,382
- 33,810
- 2,300
How about the Romney "47%" one from last election cycle?
Nobody set Romney up by lying to get him to show up, and asking pointed questions to get that out of him. They only recorded the speech that he or one of his employees wrote expressing his beliefs. That doesn't meet any criteria for a sting.
The lying isn't the issue. PP thought they were dealing with a potential buyer. This is how they act with potential buyers.
There is nothing wrong with a sting. In fact if you support abortion and think there is nothing wrong with what they did, how about defending PP's words an actions instead of attacking the method of getting said information?
Because the information is not representative and is misdirected.
it looks pretty representative to me, and they release the unedited videos as well.
It's what you chose to believe. Not what the facts are.
So the PP woman was lying? PP doesn't offer fetal tissue? They don't charge what they call a "handling fee"?