Fracking Babies (To Death)

[Lonestar_logic]

T

.
Republicans are such hypocrites, they get all pissy about the politics of a woman's right to choose, but support and defend Fracking Babies (To Death) without holding their representatives feet to the fire (so to speak).

Fracking Linked to Increased Infant Mortality in Alarming New Study

Pennsylvania has issued more than 10,000 drilling permits over the past decade. Infants and children may be paying a heavy price.

By Reynard Loki
June 25, 2015

A new study has linked fracking to a higher incidence in infant mortality, perinatal mortality, low-weight births, premature births and cancer in infants and children.

Funded by the Pittsburgh Foundation and written by Joe Mangano, co-founder and president of the Radiation and Public Health Project, a nonprofit educational and scientific organization that studies the relationship between low-level, nuclear radiation and public health, the study used data from state agencies to examine eight heavily fracked counties in Pennsylvania — four in the northeast and four in the southwest region of the state, counties that account for the majority of the state's natural gas drill wells and gas production. In all categories but child cancer, increases were greater in the northeast counties than they were in the four southwest counties.

<snip>

Analyzing publicly available data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mangano found that, since the early 2000s and compared to the rest of the state, the heavily-fracked counties have seen a rise in infant mortality (13.9 percent), perinatal mortality (23.6 percent), low-weight births (3.4 percent), premature births/gestation less than 32 weeks (12.4 percent) and cancer incidence in age 0-4 (35.1 percent).

<snip>


.

In the most comprehensive study of the subject ever conducted, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection found that there is no concern of radiation exposure from fracking wells for oil or gas (PA DEP News Release).


The Fracking Solution Is A Good Cement Job - Forbes

You're welcome.

That was from 2012!

So? It still holds true three years later.

Then tell us , lone star logic, about something that is current, and local to you - the Barnett shale aquafer contamination. (This is the underground water for Dallas/Fort Worth and parts north.)

Or would that be illogical for you?

Alarming study shows dangerous water along Barnett Shale

I believe environmentalist, like climatologist are trying to make something out of nothing.

 

[Edgetho]

.
Republicans are such hypocrites, they get all pissy about the politics of a woman's right to choose, but support and defend Fracking Babies (To Death) without holding their representatives feet to the fire (so to speak).

Fracking Linked to Increased Infant Mortality in Alarming New Study

Pennsylvania has issued more than 10,000 drilling permits over the past decade. Infants and children may be paying a heavy price.

By Reynard Loki
June 25, 2015

A new study has linked fracking to a higher incidence in infant mortality, perinatal mortality, low-weight births, premature births and cancer in infants and children.

Funded by the Pittsburgh Foundation and written by Joe Mangano, co-founder and president of the Radiation and Public Health Project, a nonprofit educational and scientific organization that studies the relationship between low-level, nuclear radiation and public health, the study used data from state agencies to examine eight heavily fracked counties in Pennsylvania — four in the northeast and four in the southwest region of the state, counties that account for the majority of the state's natural gas drill wells and gas production. In all categories but child cancer, increases were greater in the northeast counties than they were in the four southwest counties.

<snip>

Analyzing publicly available data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mangano found that, since the early 2000s and compared to the rest of the state, the heavily-fracked counties have seen a rise in infant mortality (13.9 percent), perinatal mortality (23.6 percent), low-weight births (3.4 percent), premature births/gestation less than 32 weeks (12.4 percent) and cancer incidence in age 0-4 (35.1 percent).

<snip>


.

scumbags citing scumbags.

AlterNet is a Soros website

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=977

......As for George in particular, the father paid a Hungarian government official named Baumbach to claim George as his Christian godson, “Sandor Kiss,” and to let the boy live with him in Budapest. One of Baumbach's duties was to deliver deportation notices to Hungary's Jews, confiscating their property and turning it over to Germany. Young George Soros sometimes accompanied the official on his rounds.14 Many years later, in December 1998, a CBS interviewer would ask Soros whether he had ever felt any guilt about his association with Baumbach during that period. Soros replied: “… I was only a spectator ... I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.”

Soros today recalls the German occupation of Hungary as “probably the happiest year of my life.” “For me,” he elaborates, “it was a very positive experience. It's a strange thing because you see incredible suffering around you...."

dimocraps are scum

 

[Impenitent]

T

.
Republicans are such hypocrites, they get all pissy about the politics of a woman's right to choose, but support and defend Fracking Babies (To Death) without holding their representatives feet to the fire (so to speak).

Fracking Linked to Increased Infant Mortality in Alarming New Study

Pennsylvania has issued more than 10,000 drilling permits over the past decade. Infants and children may be paying a heavy price.

By Reynard Loki
June 25, 2015

A new study has linked fracking to a higher incidence in infant mortality, perinatal mortality, low-weight births, premature births and cancer in infants and children.

Funded by the Pittsburgh Foundation and written by Joe Mangano, co-founder and president of the Radiation and Public Health Project, a nonprofit educational and scientific organization that studies the relationship between low-level, nuclear radiation and public health, the study used data from state agencies to examine eight heavily fracked counties in Pennsylvania — four in the northeast and four in the southwest region of the state, counties that account for the majority of the state's natural gas drill wells and gas production. In all categories but child cancer, increases were greater in the northeast counties than they were in the four southwest counties.

<snip>

Analyzing publicly available data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mangano found that, since the early 2000s and compared to the rest of the state, the heavily-fracked counties have seen a rise in infant mortality (13.9 percent), perinatal mortality (23.6 percent), low-weight births (3.4 percent), premature births/gestation less than 32 weeks (12.4 percent) and cancer incidence in age 0-4 (35.1 percent).

<snip>


.

In the most comprehensive study of the subject ever conducted, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection found that there is no concern of radiation exposure from fracking wells for oil or gas (PA DEP News Release).


The Fracking Solution Is A Good Cement Job - Forbes

You're welcome.

That was from 2012!

So? It still holds true three years later.

Then tell us , lone star logic, about something that is current, and local to you - the Barnett shale aquafer contamination. (This is the underground water for Dallas/Fort Worth and parts north.)

Or would that be illogical for you?

Alarming study shows dangerous water along Barnett Shale

I believe environmentalist, like climatologist are trying to make something out of nothing.

Logic like that puts fertilizer plants next to schools:

 

[Derideo_Te]

T

In the most comprehensive study of the subject ever conducted, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection found that there is no concern of radiation exposure from fracking wells for oil or gas (PA DEP News Release).


The Fracking Solution Is A Good Cement Job - Forbes

You're welcome.

That was from 2012!

So? It still holds true three years later.

Then tell us , lone star logic, about something that is current, and local to you - the Barnett shale aquafer contamination. (This is the underground water for Dallas/Fort Worth and parts north.)

Or would that be illogical for you?

Alarming study shows dangerous water along Barnett Shale

I believe environmentalist, like climatologist are trying to make something out of nothing.

Logic like that puts fertilizer plants next to schools:

The Libertarian dogma of having no government regulations means that there should be no restrictions against having open sewers next to restaurants.

Toxic waste dumps should be allowed next to playgrounds.

Coal fired furnaces should be next to people's homes.

The toxins from fracking in drinking water is perfectly acceptable to Libertarians.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

.
Republicans are such hypocrites, they get all pissy about the politics of a woman's right to choose, but support and defend Fracking Babies (To Death) without holding their representatives feet to the fire (so to speak).

Fracking Linked to Increased Infant Mortality in Alarming New Study

Pennsylvania has issued more than 10,000 drilling permits over the past decade. Infants and children may be paying a heavy price.

By Reynard Loki
June 25, 2015

A new study has linked fracking to a higher incidence in infant mortality, perinatal mortality, low-weight births, premature births and cancer in infants and children.

Funded by the Pittsburgh Foundation and written by Joe Mangano, co-founder and president of the Radiation and Public Health Project, a nonprofit educational and scientific organization that studies the relationship between low-level, nuclear radiation and public health, the study used data from state agencies to examine eight heavily fracked counties in Pennsylvania — four in the northeast and four in the southwest region of the state, counties that account for the majority of the state's natural gas drill wells and gas production. In all categories but child cancer, increases were greater in the northeast counties than they were in the four southwest counties.

<snip>

Analyzing publicly available data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mangano found that, since the early 2000s and compared to the rest of the state, the heavily-fracked counties have seen a rise in infant mortality (13.9 percent), perinatal mortality (23.6 percent), low-weight births (3.4 percent), premature births/gestation less than 32 weeks (12.4 percent) and cancer incidence in age 0-4 (35.1 percent).

<snip>


.

That logic would have us banning cars since so many babies in the womb, babies in carseats, and little kids die in car accidents.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

T

That was from 2012!

So? It still holds true three years later.

Then tell us , lone star logic, about something that is current, and local to you - the Barnett shale aquafer contamination. (This is the underground water for Dallas/Fort Worth and parts north.)

Or would that be illogical for you?

Alarming study shows dangerous water along Barnett Shale

I believe environmentalist, like climatologist are trying to make something out of nothing.

Logic like that puts fertilizer plants next to schools:

The Libertarian dogma of having no government regulations means that there should be no restrictions against having open sewers next to restaurants.

Toxic waste dumps should be allowed next to playgrounds.

Coal fired furnaces should be next to people's homes.

The toxins from fracking in drinking water is perfectly acceptable to Libertarians.

Now you're just making shit up.... smh

 

[Impenitent]

What would we call a process of using a series of truths to attain yet another truth? That might be logic!

Though they obviously haven't yet perfected that process in your part of Texas.

 

[healthmyths]

T

That was from 2012!

So? It still holds true three years later.

Then tell us , lone star logic, about something that is current, and local to you - the Barnett shale aquafer contamination. (This is the underground water for Dallas/Fort Worth and parts north.)

Or would that be illogical for you?

Alarming study shows dangerous water along Barnett Shale

I believe environmentalist, like climatologist are trying to make something out of nothing.

Logic like that puts fertilizer plants next to schools:

The Libertarian dogma of having no government regulations means that there should be no restrictions against having open sewers next to restaurants.

Toxic waste dumps should be allowed next to playgrounds.

Coal fired furnaces should be next to people's homes.

The toxins from fracking in drinking water is perfectly acceptable to Libertarians.

I keep posting this article about why NYC would be destroyed by 1980 written by experts in the 1880s...

In 1880, the U.S. brought together a group they considered the world’s smartest people to answer one pressing question…
What will New York City look like in 100 years? New York was in full bloom.
It was an unprecedented hub of entrepreneurship and innovation.
Yes, it was an exciting time to be a New Yorker.
The world’s first elevated train… underground subway… and with the first skyscraper in the hopper…
The Big Apple was changing how the world thought about — and lived — in cities.
So everyone was curious: What lies ahead for The City That Never Sleeps?

The team of big brains plugged their gourds together and mulled it over…They talked. .
They all came to a unanimous agreement.

“In 100 years time,” they said (in essence), “probably well before, New York will be…” Wait for it…“… completely destroyed!”
Yep. That was their conclusion and they were sticking to it.

How did they come to such a drastic determination?
Well, look no further than the population boom. And… horses.
In the early 1800s, there were about 30,000 people in New York.
And by 1880, that number had ballooned to nearly four million.
The city’s population had, on average, doubled in size every decade.
The brainiacs assumed that this trend would continue.
And in assuming this trend to continue, they began to wonder how all of these people would get around.
Horrified, they began to imagine all the horses the city would need.
By 1980, the team concluded, New York would need more than six million horses.

And six million horses presents an obvious problem. The city already had 200,000 horses in 1880.
Each one, they somehow calculated, dumped a quart of urine and 24 pounds of manure every day.

That’s 4.8 million pounds of horse dung and 50,000 gallons of pee already being dumped into the streets… every. single. day.

Needless to say, horse waste was already a problem.
The city was already drowning in it. “The stench was omnipresent,” one writer, Eric Morris, wrote in his urban planning Masters thesis… “Urban streets were minefields that needed to be navigated with the greatest care,” the thesis reads. “‘Crossing sweepers’ stood on street corners; for a fee they would clear a path through the mire for pedestrians. Wet weather turned the streets into swamps and rivers of muck, but dry weather brought little improvement; the manure turned to dust, which was then whipped up by the wind, choking pedestrians and coating buildings. “…even when it had been removed from the streets the manure piled up faster than it could be disposed of…early in the century farmers were happy to pay good money for the manure, by the end of the 1800s stable owners had to pay to have it carted off. As a result of this glut…
vacant lots in cities across America became piled high with manure; in New York these sometimes rose to forty and even sixty feet.”
Worse, manure is breeding ground for flies. And flies spread disease. Typhoid outbreaks, Morris wrote, “and “infant diarrheal disease can be traced to spikes in fly population.” Now times that situation by 30.
It slowly dawned on our intrepid researchers that by 1980, New York’s poor sidewalks and streets would gather 144 million pounds of dung… and be awash with 1,500,000 gallons of horse urine.
Great News Six Million Horses Almost Destroyed New York City

Horses! NOT one mention of the automobile.... why ? Because it wasn't invented yet!

Finally I remember this book in 1973...

Technology: Whale Oil, Arab Oil and No Oil

Gould, Inc.
Technology Whale Oil Arab Oil and No Oil - Gould Inc - Google Books

There were gas lines everywhere as Iran shut off Middle east oil. ANGST was abound! LONG lines and we all didn't know where the next drop was coming from!

OH hummmmmmmmm!

 

[Derideo_Te]

T

So? It still holds true three years later.

Then tell us , lone star logic, about something that is current, and local to you - the Barnett shale aquafer contamination. (This is the underground water for Dallas/Fort Worth and parts north.)

Or would that be illogical for you?

Alarming study shows dangerous water along Barnett Shale

I believe environmentalist, like climatologist are trying to make something out of nothing.

Logic like that puts fertilizer plants next to schools:

The Libertarian dogma of having no government regulations means that there should be no restrictions against having open sewers next to restaurants.

Toxic waste dumps should be allowed next to playgrounds.

Coal fired furnaces should be next to people's homes.

The toxins from fracking in drinking water is perfectly acceptable to Libertarians.

Now you're just making shit up.... smh

Read the Libertarian party agenda for yourself. It is right there on their website. And while you are about it you can see just how similar it is to the GOP platform. The Koch paid for that to happen.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

T
Then tell us , lone star logic, about something that is current, and local to you - the Barnett shale aquafer contamination. (This is the underground water for Dallas/Fort Worth and parts north.)

Or would that be illogical for you?

Alarming study shows dangerous water along Barnett Shale

I believe environmentalist, like climatologist are trying to make something out of nothing.

Logic like that puts fertilizer plants next to schools:

The Libertarian dogma of having no government regulations means that there should be no restrictions against having open sewers next to restaurants.

Toxic waste dumps should be allowed next to playgrounds.

Coal fired furnaces should be next to people's homes.

The toxins from fracking in drinking water is perfectly acceptable to Libertarians.

Now you're just making shit up.... smh

Read the Libertarian party agenda for yourself. It is right there on their website. And while you are about it you can see just how similar it is to the GOP platform. The Koch paid for that to happen.

I care as much for the libertarian party as a do the democrats. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim.

So prove that the libertarians want open sewers next to restaurants, toxic waste sites next to playgrounds, coal fired furnaces next to people homes and toxins in their drinking water from fracking.

 

[Derideo_Te]

I believe environmentalist, like climatologist are trying to make something out of nothing.

Logic like that puts fertilizer plants next to schools:

The Libertarian dogma of having no government regulations means that there should be no restrictions against having open sewers next to restaurants.

Toxic waste dumps should be allowed next to playgrounds.

Coal fired furnaces should be next to people's homes.

The toxins from fracking in drinking water is perfectly acceptable to Libertarians.

Now you're just making shit up.... smh

Read the Libertarian party agenda for yourself. It is right there on their website. And while you are about it you can see just how similar it is to the GOP platform. The Koch paid for that to happen.

I care as much for the libertarian party as a do the democrats. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim.

So prove that the libertarians want open sewers next to restaurants, toxic waste sites next to playgrounds, coal fired furnaces next to people homes and toxins in their drinking water from fracking.

Platform Libertarian Party

 

[martybegan]

Unfounded science warrants a hysterical response. Congrats

Hysterical kneejerk reaction to actual evidence that fossil fuels are bad for your health.

Everything is bad for your health.

 

[martybegan]

Not sure about this baby study, but fracking operations can leak toxic substances into the groundwater, and chemical byproducts into the air. It is for that reason that water trucks are brought in.

If fracking is proposed for your area, then I would advise to sell up and leave, if you can, as the risk is there. Though, if you want to be a Dodo, then by all means test your theory and live next door to a fracking well.

omg, so lets give up our lives because of some study. why don't we just all kill ourselves so we will NEVER have another fear in our lives
for crying out the SKY IS always falling with you people

Move and live next door to a fracking well, if you think there is no health risk whatesover.

You don't need a study to realize that whether you live next to a factory or an industrial operation, there are health risks.

But as I said, test your theory, and live your life like the folks in gasland. However, it is probably safer to live in the red zone of Chernobyl.

Absolute and total bullshit.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Logic like that puts fertilizer plants next to schools:

The Libertarian dogma of having no government regulations means that there should be no restrictions against having open sewers next to restaurants.

Toxic waste dumps should be allowed next to playgrounds.

Coal fired furnaces should be next to people's homes.

The toxins from fracking in drinking water is perfectly acceptable to Libertarians.

Now you're just making shit up.... smh

Read the Libertarian party agenda for yourself. It is right there on their website. And while you are about it you can see just how similar it is to the GOP platform. The Koch paid for that to happen.

I care as much for the libertarian party as a do the democrats. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim.

So prove that the libertarians want open sewers next to restaurants, toxic waste sites next to playgrounds, coal fired furnaces next to people homes and toxins in their drinking water from fracking.

Platform Libertarian Party

2 Environment

We support a clean and healthy environment and sensible use of our natural resources. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Pollution and misuse of resources cause damage to our ecosystem. Governments, unlike private businesses, are unaccountable for such damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights in resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. We realize that our planet's climate is constantly changing, but environmental advocates and social pressure are the most effective means of changing public behavior.

Seems you were wrong.

 

[Impenitent]

Unfounded science warrants a hysterical response. Congrats

Hysterical kneejerk reaction to actual evidence that fossil fuels are bad for your health.

Everything is bad for your health.

Two of my high school buddies were killed in Vietnam. They just didn't know it until 25 years later ...

Agent orange

Many of the same dioxins are in fracking fluid. Don't think you won't be exposed.

So you only drink bottled water? Do you bathe in it? Inhale the shower steam? Wash your hands?

Every well casing will eventually fail. Some spills will occur. It's only a matter of time.

Dioxins are killing a generation of our veterans. It will be a disaster in Vietnam forever.

We should have learned.

Human Health Issues from Endocrine Disruption Chemicals Exposure

 

[martybegan]

Unfounded science warrants a hysterical response. Congrats

Hysterical kneejerk reaction to actual evidence that fossil fuels are bad for your health.

Everything is bad for your health.

Two of my high school buddies were killed in Vietnam. They just didn't know it until 25 years later ...

Agent orange

Many of the same dioxins are in fracking fluid. Don't think you won't be exposed.

So you only drink bottled water? Do you bathe in it? Inhale the shower steam? Wash your hands?

Every well casing will eventually fail. Some spills will occur. It's only a matter of time.

Dioxins are killing a generation of our veterans. It will be a disaster in Vietnam forever.

We should have learned.

Human Health Issues from Endocrine Disruption Chemicals Exposure

Direct application of a defoliant onto soldiers cannot be compared to possible contamination of water due pipe casing failure, which would have to travel through the water table in question, and leak in sufficient amount to cause contamination.

 

[Star]

Unfounded science warrants a hysterical response. Congrats

Hysterical kneejerk reaction to actual evidence that fossil fuels are bad for your health.

What model Flintstone Mobile do you drive?

I drive a Toyota Prius. It's my second hybrid car.

We decided in 2001 to never buy another regular gas car again. And we haven't.

During the summer I get anywhere from 53 to 55 miles per gallon on that car. In the winter it decreases because of the different gas, I get around 48 to 51 miles to the gallon in the winter.

I've never had to get that car smog checked either which saves time, hassle and money. Many places I go have special parking in the front of the building just for hybrid and what we call E friendly vehicles.

There is no fracking in my state. Thank goodness. It will be interesting too see how infant mortality rates compare from states with frack and states that don't have it. I'm sure that infants and babies are a lot safer in states without tracking.

It's a pretty safe bet that far fewer infants will die from Fracking than at then hands of Taxpyer Funded Planned Parenthood Abortionists.

One very obvious difference between "Taxpyer Funded Planned Parenthood Abortion[ists.]" and "Fracking Babies (To Death)" is: one is a legal choice, the other is the crime of Manslaughter perpetrated by the taxpayer subsidized carbon based energy industry.
Am I right? - prove me wrong.


Manslaughter
The unjustifiable, inexcusable, and intentional killing of a human being without deliberation, premeditation, and malice. The unlawful killing of a human being without any deliberation, which may be involuntary, in the commission of a lawful act without due caution and circumspection.

<snip>
.

 

[whitehall]

WTF? Do hypocrite democrats understand the difference in meaning of "a study has linked" and freaking stabbing a full term infant in the back of the head and sucking out it's brain?

 

[Derideo_Te]

The Libertarian dogma of having no government regulations means that there should be no restrictions against having open sewers next to restaurants.

Toxic waste dumps should be allowed next to playgrounds.

Coal fired furnaces should be next to people's homes.

The toxins from fracking in drinking water is perfectly acceptable to Libertarians.

Now you're just making shit up.... smh

Read the Libertarian party agenda for yourself. It is right there on their website. And while you are about it you can see just how similar it is to the GOP platform. The Koch paid for that to happen.

I care as much for the libertarian party as a do the democrats. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim.

So prove that the libertarians want open sewers next to restaurants, toxic waste sites next to playgrounds, coal fired furnaces next to people homes and toxins in their drinking water from fracking.

Platform Libertarian Party

2 Environment

We support a clean and healthy environment and sensible use of our natural resources. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Pollution and misuse of resources cause damage to our ecosystem. Governments, unlike private businesses, are unaccountable for such damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights in resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. We realize that our planet's climate is constantly changing, but environmental advocates and social pressure are the most effective means of changing public behavior.

Seems you were wrong.

Actually that proves me right but I never expected you to comprehend that Libertarian "free markets" will always override the environment without any government enforcement to ensure that the polluters are held accountable.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Unfounded science warrants a hysterical response. Congrats

Hysterical kneejerk reaction to actual evidence that fossil fuels are bad for your health.

Everything is bad for your health.

Two of my high school buddies were killed in Vietnam. They just didn't know it until 25 years later ...

Agent orange

Many of the same dioxins are in fracking fluid. Don't think you won't be exposed.

So you only drink bottled water? Do you bathe in it? Inhale the shower steam? Wash your hands?

Every well casing will eventually fail. Some spills will occur. It's only a matter of time.

Dioxins are killing a generation of our veterans. It will be a disaster in Vietnam forever.

We should have learned.

Human Health Issues from Endocrine Disruption Chemicals Exposure

Direct application of a defoliant onto soldiers cannot be compared to possible contamination of water due pipe casing failure, which would have to travel through the water table in question, and leak in sufficient amount to cause contamination.

Contamination is already detectable in the potable water supply and the mortality rate for the most vulnerable is increasing.