Moonglow
Diamond Member
The expenditure of energy to make an effort is not free..Fine. Go try grabbing McGillicutty's cow without paying for it and see how much buckshot you find in your ass.
Would there be a cow to take if grass wasn't free.
Grass isn't free. On a purely technical level they do not directly pay someone to grow the grass, but from an economic perspective, there is a cost to maintaining the land.
If you simply set your cattle loose, they wander off and you lose them. So you have to fence in the land. Then you have to provide watering troughs. Additionally, you'll need to start partitioning the land.
If you simply let your cattle into the land, they'll tend to over graze and destroy the grass in one area, and leave the rest alone.
You must build fences to force the cattle to graze the land more evenly, so the grass is not destroyed.
Then you'll also need to do some land management, such as eliminating weeds that over run the grass. Sometimes you'll need to fertilize the grass depending on the condition of the soil, and the climate situation.
Lastly, you'll have to do some water management. If the cattle get into the water supply of the land too much, they can ruin the water supply and harm grass growth. So water inlets need fenced off, and water outlets need protected. You can't completely fence off the water, as it has to reach the soil to water the grass. But you can't allow the cattle into it, to ruin the water.
You may also need to determine what types of grass are in your grazing area, and may need to plant better grass than what is there.
Point being, there is a ton of work and effort, and even money, that goes into providing that "free" grass for your cattle.
That's one of the reasons that when you lease land for cattle grazing, you'll generally see two different prices for the same general area.
One owner is providing maintained land, which demands a higher price, because the land owner is spending the money to maintain the land.
Another owner is providing grazing land as-is, which fetches a lower price, because the cattle owner has to spend the money to maintain the grazing land himself.
The Bottom line again is... nothing in this world is free. Nothing.
If there were no humans on the planet, cattle would eat FREE grass. And before they were mostly killed off, there were millions of buffalo that roamed the prairies. There probably wouldn't have been so many if they were overgrazing. All of it Free Free Free.
What has that, got to do with the realities of Human existence? If you are talking about how wild animals live, great. Good point. Well done Forest. You get a cookie.
Now unless you are advocating living like an animal, in which case you are failing miserably being on the internet right now.... then your point is irrelevant, and really really stupid.
By all means, go live in mud huts, and hunt raccoons and wild berries.
Now, if you want to get back to applying this to real life, where the rest of us live........ nothing... is.... free.
Moving on?
Are you really that clueless? Ants do what they do. All for free. Termites and bees do what they do. All for free. Humans do what they do. One of those things is being on the internet. It should also all be for free. Do you get the drift?
Next, we get the police for free. Fire fighters put out fires for free. The post office delivers mail for free. Etc. etc. etc. Is that over your head too?