Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I already explained why Slager said what he did. No need to reiterate.We all have all told you the truth: you are wrong. Slager admits he was wrong. Why do you hate blacks, because that is what you are about. So tell us. Be honest: tell us.
As for this >> "Why do you hate blacks", why do you go around portraying people as racists ? Gotta use that race card at least once a day ? Is that it ?
No lie.... No caught.... Not pissy.LOL- protectionist is cute when he gets all pissy because he is caught in his own lies.
You "assure" WRONG. Your assurance is in violation and contradiction of law. Slager had an OBLIGATION to shoot Scott, as he did, to prevent his escape. Try reading the LAW * before you post. In the meantime, we'll be on guard to not blindly accept your assurances.Slager plead guilty to violating Scott's Federal Civil Rights. PLEAD GUILTY. End of story.
And, having seen more of the story and having heard more of the facts than a lot of folks here (I do live here after all), I assure you that he had no call to shoot Walter Scott. That they acquitted him in the state trial was a gift.
Refuted in the previous post. Ho hum. Yawn ***PLED GUILTY, protectionist. You are now engaged in criminal libel.
FALSE! Your mistake was the use of the word "all". Obviously my statement ("by pandering to voter populations of deranged, ignorant, and paranoidly, racist blacks") was referring to ONLY those blacks who were deranged, ignorant, and paranoidly, racist (which the community "leaders") saw as the voter majority.You have portrayed all blacks as racists:
by pandering to voter populations of deranged, ignorant, and paranoidly, racist blacks.
NOT the end of the story. And "unarmed" has nothing to do with it, nor does the fact that Scott was shot in the back, nor does the fact that Scott was black.Well...a lot of noise..but the facts..as they stand is that Slager will do 20 years in prison..regardless of anyone's reading of the law..that is a fact.
Ex-cop sentenced to 20 years for killing of unarmed black man
Former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager was sentenced today to 20 years in prison for the deadly shooting of unarmed black man Walter Scott.
U.S. District Judge David Norton ruled that Slager committed second-degree murder and obstruction of justice, when he shot and killed 50-year-old Scott in 2015. The second-degree murder ruling came with a recommended 19 to 24 year sentence.
End of story.
FALSE! I know my comments are true, because they conform to THE LAW. YOUR comments are false, because they are contrary to THE LAW.protectionist struggles ahead, moaning and groaning, knowing that his comments are false.
Slager confessed, no appeal. He will do his time.
End of story.
Fleeing felon rule - Wikipedia
NOT the end of the story. And "unarmed" has nothing to do with it, nor does the fact that Scott was shot in the back, nor does the fact that Scott was black.Well...a lot of noise..but the facts..as they stand is that Slager will do 20 years in prison..regardless of anyone's reading of the law..that is a fact.
Ex-cop sentenced to 20 years for killing of unarmed black man
Former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager was sentenced today to 20 years in prison for the deadly shooting of unarmed black man Walter Scott.
U.S. District Judge David Norton ruled that Slager committed second-degree murder and obstruction of justice, when he shot and killed 50-year-old Scott in 2015. The second-degree murder ruling came with a recommended 19 to 24 year sentence.
End of story.
Fighting with police is not always a felony. I have fought the police physically in the past and never been charged with a felony. Resisting arrest is not a felony. If I can punch & headbutt a cop and not be charged as a felon for it then this situation is not any different.Some time ago, a fleeing felon, Walter Scott, was shot and killed by a police officer, Michael Slager, in N. Charleston, South Carolina. Scott, caused all this trouble by first disobeying the cop’s orders, then running away, then physically fighting with the cop (according to an eyewitness), and then running away again. Scott did everything wrong ( and stupid). Slager, seeing Scott running away again, and escaping (thereby posing a danger to the community if he were to escape), shot Scott as he was fleeing away.
All of this (on Slager’s part), is in conformance with the law. According to the Fleeing Felon Rule, a police officer may shoot a felon (which Scott was after fighting with the officer), as he is fleeing, since he could pose a danger to the community, if he got away.
Just about everybody (even some right-wing talk show hosts) blamed Slager, and made a big deal out of Scott having been shot in the back ? Well, where else would/could a fleeing felon ever be shot ? When he’s running away from the cop, it will always be his back that is in front of the cop.
Despite the fact that Slager was within his rights to shoot Scott as he was fleeing (and it was Slager’s DUTY to do that), nevertheless, the N. Charleston city fathers charged the cop with murder, and he remains locked in jail to this day. But why would they charge the cop with murder, when he was just doing his job ? Answer ? >>> Politics.
Scott was black. Slager is white. When black people (egged on by Obama, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and other race hustlers) hear that a black man was shot by a white cop, they generally (often wrongly) think police brutality.
Well, some may say that with the cop being within his rights to shoot the guy (he was, and yes, in the back), it should be justifiable homicide. The people who charged Slager know that. So why would they charge him with murder ? The answer if that N. Charleston is a black majority town, and to not charge Slager, they would be putting themselves at odds with the majority of N. Charleston VOTERS, who tend to see things more in terms of black & white, rather than right & wrong (or legal/illegal).
Explaining the Fleeing Felon rule to these voters would not likely do much good. At least at the time, Obama and his race hustlers were whipping blacks up into a frenzy of anti-police attitude, and N. Charleston’s majority black community was feeling a lot of hostility toward cops, especially white ones.
Slager should be exonerated, freed, and paid compensation for his unjust, false arrest and imprisonment.
1. Slager did NOT make a bad decision. The only reason he was even ludicrously charged with murder is because the chargers feared a voter backlash if they didn't charge. Had nothing to do with anything Slager did.This much we agree on..the Black part should irrelevant..Slager was a bad cop..who made a bad decision and took a life..when he need not have done so. You can twist and shout about the finer points of your interpretation of the law--but if a cop chooses to use deadly force..and is wrong..the price should be high.
BTW....the unarmed part is very pertinent..since had Scott been armed..the danger to the community would have been exigent..and Slager cleared.
FALSE! Your mistake was the use of the word "all".You have portrayed all blacks as racists:
by pandering to voter populations of deranged, ignorant, and paranoidly, racist blacks.
FALSE! I know my comments are true, because they conform to THE LAW.protectionist struggles ahead, moaning and groaning, knowing that his comments are false.
Slager confessed, no appeal. He will do his time.
End of story.
Nonsense. Taser has nothing to do with murder charge. If the city fathers want to charge Slager with tampering a crime scene, go ahead. That's a far cry from a murder charge and it's a change of the subject. We're talking about Slager's 20 year sentence. That came from a murder charge plea, not a tampering charge.Slager should have done life in the electric chair. The complaints about the “Law” from Protectionist are bullshit. Why?
Slager staged the scene. He moved the Taser close to the body of his victim to justify his action. He claimed he was in fear of his life. He lied. That totally wipes out the fleeing felon argument. Why? Because that was not the justification that Slager used when he murdered Scott.
Fuck Slager. When or if Slager is looking at Parole, I hope I am alive to write a letter to the board telling them why he should serve every fuckng minute of his sentence.
Slager is a punk. A thug who hid behind his badge like too many cops out there. They are enabled by the fawning of the Protectionist types.
This isn't about my "idea" of "what constitutes a felon", it is about what constitutes a felon under South Carolina law >>Fighting with police is not always a felony. I have fought the police physically in the past and never been charged with a felony. Resisting arrest is not a felony. If I can punch & headbutt a cop and not be charged as a felon for it then this situation is not any different.
I am not saying anything about the merits of this case, just commenting on your idea of what constitutes a felon.
