Free Officer Michael Slager

[easyt65]

The big ado about this shooting, according to many, was that 'another black person who did not have a weapon was shot by a white cop'. This incident took place, I believe, during the entire outcry across the country about Baltimore, Ferguson, etc.

Many of the facts that the OP pointed out are true (all that I can tell, actually); however, the media and groups like BLM wanted to part in the actual details. Again, the only think that mattered was a black person who did not have a gun was shot by a white cop.

It did not matter that Michael Brown stole food from a convenience store, assaulted the owner on his way out, ignored police requests to move out of the street, refused to comply with police orders, disrespected the police, attacked a policeman, and the policeman shot and killed Brown - a 'kid' who had no weapon. He was 'another' un-armed black person shot and killed by a white cop.

It does not matter to many that Slager's victim refused to comply, broke the law, resisted arrest, attempted to attack him, and then tried to run. 'He was 'another' un-armed black person shot and killed by a white cop.'


I am not 100% familiar with all the facts of this case. I am not saying Slager did not do anything wrong or that if he had done something different this could not have been prevented. I am saying if his victim had done some things different he would not be dead right now.

'It is what it is'.

 

[protectionist]

Slager would not be in jail if all of us had been taught that we are all equal, if you are afraid of, think less of any race, that fear or lack of concern would make it much easier to shoot some one.

Fleeing felon law says nothing about race. Liberals try to make everything racial..

 

[protectionist]

The big ado about this shooting, according to many, was that 'another black person who did not have a weapon was shot by a white cop'. This incident took place, I believe, during the entire outcry across the country about Baltimore, Ferguson, etc.

Many of the facts that the OP pointed out are true (all that I can tell, actually); however, the media and groups like BLM wanted to part in the actual details. Again, the only think that mattered was a black person who did not have a gun was shot by a white cop.

It did not matter that Michael Brown stole food from a convenience store, assaulted the owner on his way out, ignored police requests to move out of the street, refused to comply with police orders, disrespected the police, attacked a policeman, and the policeman shot and killed Brown - a 'kid' who had no weapon. He was 'another' un-armed black person shot and killed by a white cop.

It does not matter to many that Slager's victim refused to comply, broke the law, resisted arrest, attempted to attack him, and then tried to run. 'He was 'another' un-armed black person shot and killed by a white cop.'


I am not 100% familiar with all the facts of this case. I am not saying Slager did not do anything wrong or that if he had done something different this could not have been prevented. I am saying if his victim had done some things different he would not be dead right now.

'It is what it is'.

If you're saying Slager DID do something wrong, what would that be ?

 

[protectionist]

Hard to imagine why anyone would want that job knowing they might become fodder for political optics.

Some people have no scruples. Add US District Judge Norton to that list. Sentencing someone to 20 years in prison for doing his job according to the law, but not according to the whims of the black community.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Snowflake Doofus 7th Class protectionist: be quiet unless you have something to offer.

Slager is exactly where he belongs.

YOU should be quiet. Slager shot felon Scott in the back, as he was fleeing, as the law prescribes, ....despite all your liberal lunacy ravings.

You pull that crap in public, and you will go to jail for the short rest of your unnatural life.

Slager apologized after sentencing and is not appealing.

Slager was wrong for shooting the guy, and you are immoral for defending him.

No, if you will be quiet, people will not realize just how goofy are your statements.

 

[protectionist]

You pull that crap in public, and you will go to jail for the short rest of your unnatural life.

Slager apologized after sentencing and is not appealing.

Slager was wrong for shooting the guy, and you are immoral for defending him.

No, if you will be quiet, people will not realize just how goofy are your statements.

You pull that crap in public, and you will go to a mental institution for the rest of your unnatural life. (or the circus)

Slager has no need to apologize, and is simply reacting to the politics. whether he appeals or nit is nit yet determined, but the politics could well control that too.. Ho hum. Elementary.

Slager was right for shooting the guy, and you are immoral for criticiing him. yawn ****

No, if you will be quiet, people will not realize just how goofy are your statements

 

[g5000]

Some time ago, a fleeing felon, Walter Scott, was shot and killed by a police officer, Michael Slager, in N. Charleston, South Carolina. Scott, caused all this trouble by first disobeying the cop’s orders, then running away, then physically fighting with the cop (according to an eyewitness), and then running away again. Scott did everything wrong ( and stupid). Slager, seeing Scott running away again, and escaping (thereby posing a danger to the community if he were to escape), shot Scott as he was fleeing away.

All of this (on Slager’s part), is in conformance with the law. According to the Fleeing Felon Rule, a police officer may shoot a felon (which Scott was after fighting with the officer), as he is fleeing, since he could pose a danger to the community, if he got away.

Just about everybody (even some right-wing talk show hosts) blamed Slager, and made a big deal out of Scott having been shot in the back ? Well, where else would/could a fleeing felon ever be shot ? When he’s running away from the cop, it will always be his back that is in front of the cop.

Despite the fact that Slager was within his rights to shoot Scott as he was fleeing (and it was Slager’s DUTY to do that), nevertheless, the N. Charleston city fathers charged the cop with murder, and he remains locked in jail to this day. But why would they charge the cop with murder, when he was just doing his job ? Answer ? >>> Politics.

Scott was black. Slager is white. When black people (egged on by Obama, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and other race hustlers) hear that a black man was shot by a white cop, they generally (often wrongly) think police brutality.

Well, some may say that with the cop being within his rights to shoot the guy (he was, and yes, in the back), it should be justifiable homicide. The people who charged Slager know that. So why would they charge him with murder ? The answer if that N. Charleston is a black majority town, and to not charge Slager, they would be putting themselves at odds with the majority of N. Charleston VOTERS, who tend to see things more in terms of black & white, rather than right & wrong (or legal/illegal).

Explaining the Fleeing Felon rule to these voters would not likely do much good. At least at the time, Obama and his race hustlers were whipping blacks up into a frenzy of anti-police attitude, and N. Charleston’s majority black community was feeling a lot of hostility toward cops, especially white ones.


Slager should be exonerated, freed, and paid compensation for his unjust, false arrest and imprisonment.

You are so full of shit.

First, Scott was not a "fleeing felon". The law does not permit a cop to shoot a man for having a broken tail light, you fucking, fucking, fucking retard.

Second, Scott tried to plant fake evidence, and filed a false report of the incident.

Too bad. So sad. Fuck you.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You pull that crap in public, and you will go to jail for the short rest of your unnatural life.

Slager apologized after sentencing and is not appealing.

Slager was wrong for shooting the guy, and you are immoral for defending him.

No, if you will be quiet, people will not realize just how goofy are your statements.

You pull that crap in public, and you will go to a mental institution for the rest of your unnatural life. (or the circus)

Slager has no need to apologize, and is simply reacting to the politics. whether he appeals or nit is nit yet determined, but the politics could well control that too.. Ho hum. Elementary.

Slager was right for shooting the guy, and you are immoral for criticiing him. yawn ****

No, if you will be quiet, people will not realize just how goofy are your statements

Thank you for proving that you are a troll.

 

[protectionist]

You are so full of shit.

First, Scott was not a "fleeing felon". The law does not permit a cop to shoot a man for having a broken tail light, you fucking, fucking, fucking retard.

Second, Scott tried to plant fake evidence, and filed a false report of the incident.

Too bad. So sad. Fuck you.

Awesome display of idiocy. Where/why do you think Scott was running ? For a titty bar ? Of course he wass a felon. He just fought with a cop. And he got shot for fleeing from that same cop. Duh!

As for "plant fake evidence", he was sentenced to 20 years for 2nd degree murder, not fake evidence. Go back to sleep.

Your posts are too dumb to be "full of shit" That's for smart liars.

 

[protectionist]

Thank you for proving that you are a troll.

Nothing to say ? Then find another thread.

 

[g5000]

You are so full of shit.

First, Scott was not a "fleeing felon". The law does not permit a cop to shoot a man for having a broken tail light, you fucking, fucking, fucking retard.

Second, Scott tried to plant fake evidence, and filed a false report of the incident.

Too bad. So sad. Fuck you.

Awesome display of idiocy. Where/why do you think Scott was running ? For a titty bar ? Of course he wass a felon. He just fought with a cop. And he got shot for fleeing from that same cop. Duh!

As for "plant fake evidence", he was sentenced to 20 years for 2nd degree murder, not fake evidence. Go back to sleep.

Your posts are too dumb to be "full of shit" That's for smart liars.

You really shouldn't start conversations you know fuck-all about, retard.


Mr. Slager raised his pistol, pointed it at Mr. Scott’s back, and fired eight shots. Mr. Scott, who was at least 17 feet from Mr. Slager when the officer opened fire, fell to the ground. Moments after the shooting, Mr. Slager approached Mr. Scott and dropped his Taser near him, an action that prosecutors believed was an attempt to plant evidence and skew the investigation.

Michael Slager, Officer in Walter Scott Shooting, Gets 20-Year Sentence

 

[JakeStarkey]

protectionist is simply a throw back to the 1950s and beyond.

Many of that generation have passed on, and the rest will be soon gone.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Thank you for proving that you are a troll.

Nothing to say ? Then find another thread.

We all have all told you the truth: you are wrong. Slager admits he was wrong. Why do you hate blacks, because that is what you are about. So tell us. Be honest: tell us.

 

[protectionist]

You really shouldn't start conversations you know fuck-all about, retard.


Mr. Slager raised his pistol, pointed it at Mr. Scott’s back, and fired eight shots. Mr. Scott, who was at least 17 feet from Mr. Slager when the officer opened fire, fell to the ground. Moments after the shooting, Mr. Slager approached Mr. Scott and dropped his Taser near him, an action that prosecutors believed was an attempt to plant evidence and skew the investigation.

Michael Slager, Officer in Walter Scott Shooting, Gets 20-Year Sentence

You shouldn't tell people who know what they're talking about, what to do. when you don't have the foggiest idea of what you're talking about.

You should also read OPs thoroughly, including all links, and then you wouldn't be coming in here making a fool out of yourself.

You also shouldn't commit FELONIES in USMB, in front of millions of witnesses, as you've been doing repeatedly here, including in the post I'm quoting now. (Florida Statute 825.102)

 

[protectionist]

We all have all told you the truth: you are wrong. Slager admits he was wrong. Why do you hate blacks, because that is what you are about. So tell us. Be honest: tell us.

I already explained why Slager said what he did. No need to reiterate.

As for this >> "Why do you hate blacks", why do you go around portraying people as racists ? Gotta use that race card at least once a day ? Is that it ?

 

[protectionist]

protectionist is simply a throw back to the 1950s and beyond.

Many of that generation have passed on, and the rest will be soon gone.

Quite the contrary, as Trump's election showed.

 

[JakeStarkey]

protectionist continues to yell about a lawfully and ethically convicted killer.

Your equivalency is false. And, I would bet, most of the Trump voters are happy Slager is in the pen.

 

[protectionist]

protectionist continues to yell about a lawfully and ethically convicted killer.

Your equivalency is false. And, I would bet, most of the Trump voters are happy Slager is in the pen.

You lie. I'll assume you read the OP. That's enough info for you to know you're now talking >>

Slager's conviction was a perfect example of how justice can be twisted and disposed of, in order to preserve political power, by pandering to voter populations of deranged, ignorant, and paranoidly, racist blacks.

 

[Syriusly]

[
You also shouldn't commit FELONIES in USMB, in front of millions of witnesses, as you've been doing repeatedly here, including in the post I'm quoting now. (Florida Statute 825.102)

LOL- protectionist is cute when he gets all pissy because he is caught in his own lies.

 

[Syriusly]

Slager's conviction was a perfect example of how justice can be twisted and disposed of, in order to preserve political power, by pandering to voter populations of deranged, ignorant, and paranoidly, racist blacks.

by pandering to voter populations of deranged, ignorant, and paranoidly, racist blacks

Which apparently protectionist believes should be able to be shot on sight by police.